• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The use of the atomic bomb played an important role in ending the war.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...


'The use of the atomic bomb played an important role in ending the war.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Japan launched a pre-emptive strike, an action intended to prevent attack from US forces by disabling the enemy; on the seventh of December 1941. The Joint Chiefs of Staff confronted the panorama that getting an unconditional surrender from Japan could require invading the Japanese homeland. A number of key Navy and Army Air Force officers led by Fleet Admiral Ernest King, Chief of Naval Operations, and General H. H. "Hap" Arnold, Chief of the Army Air Force, argued that a combination of sea blockade and aerial bombardment could generate a Japanese surrender without the need for a ground invasion. Army Chief of Staff General. George C. Marshall and his Army planners, however, believed that Japan's surrender on the stipulations being demanded by the Allies could only be assured by an invasion of its home territory, although arguably as declared in Truman's memoirs: 'it might cost half a million American lives to force the enemy's surrender on his home ground' also 'we laboured to construct a weapon of such overwhelming force that the enemy could be forced to yield swiftly once we could resort to it.' ...read more.


Truman's' military advisers also discussed the high number of casualties and deaths that would be involved in bringing 'Japan to her knees'. We must also take into account that Truman, was up for re-election, he had to please the public. In this pretext, it does not appear warranted that the atomic bomb was at the US's best interest. Admiral William D. Leaky, chief of staff to Harry S .Truman proclaimed that: "It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan." In this we must remember that it was a memoir published in 1950, although to some extent Admiral Leaky was right in mentioning that. There were several substitutes to considered, using the bomb in a non-combat demonstration that meant dropping the bomb in a deserted place where the Japanese could witness its power, change the U.S demand for unconditional surrender, allowing the entry of the soviets into the war, continuing conventional warfare and pursuing "Japanese peace feelers". Another idea was to give Japan an advance warning of where the bomb was going was to be dropped so that they could move the population out of the area. ...read more.


After analysing the evidence it is clear to me that, that America had numerous reasons not to use the a-bomb. Moreover, the evidence to arrive at this conclusion is bias but still offers reliable evidence. It is my belief that the use of the atomic bomb to bring about the end of World War II was not entirely justified With the many alternatives that were at the United State's disposal and all of the effects that the use of such weapons had on both environment and people for instance from a Japanese account vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhoea with large amounts of blood, purple spots on the skin, bleeding romm the mouth, death', the U.S. motive for dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified, even though in all ,the atomic bomb did give the Japanese an excuse to surrender, and did ultimately play an important part in ending the war. . Dwight D. Eisenhower said in a meeting with Henry Stimson, Secretary of War during WW II, "... the Japanese were ready to surrender and it was not necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Furthermore the lack of Japanese supplies meant that surrender was inevitable. Here we can take that the United States only dropped the atomic bomb for their interests as a world power to demonstrate their supremacy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did America drop the atomic bomb on Japan

    He wouldn't have wanted to seem weak and fragile to the world by not attacking back. Therefore with him attacking back it would have appeared he was mentally strong and was not a sissy. I think that the reason for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was, Japan

  2. WWII Atomic Weapons Were Justified

    to continue with Japan would prove to be costly by much higher means. The top solution economically for a country tired from fighting, would be to end the war as fast as possible. Without an unconditional surrender by Japan the next fastest solution was to put the atomic bombs to use.

  1. "The Use of the Atomic Bomb Played An Important Role in Ending the War"

    The official reason given by the government for dropping such a devastating weapon was that the deaths caused by the two bombs would be far less than the number of lives lost if the Japanese were not forced to surrender.

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    (as quoted in Alperovitz 1) One of the leading alternatives to the use of the bomb was an invasion of the Japanese homeland. The attack would be on Kyushu in November of 1945 and then if required an attack on the industrial centre of Japan, Honshu in March of 1946.

  1. 'Propaganda Was an Essential Weapon In the War Against Germany’ - To ...

    newspaper about propaganda as a large amount of people would be reading the information. The amount of information which was true on the war in newspapers which was unbiased was extremely rare and limited, this was due to people such as; Mr Beaverbrook, the Minister of Information, he decided what

  2. The proposition that the Meiji Restoration and Japan's modernisation were caused by Western Imperialism ...

    The Bakufu's request to the Imperial Court for advice on how to deal with the Westerner's undermined their already struggling grip on power, and only served to aid the pro-Imperial factions within the country. The letter from the Chief Councillor to the feudal aristocracy requested them to "express (their)

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    Please Note: The writing in italic is the quote and the writing in bold is my comment on the source. The letter or number beside the quote indicates where I got it from, the list of books and sites can be seen on the last page.

  2. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    The USSR and USA had not gotten along before the war and there was no reason to speculate they had planned to afterwards. Also, Truman wrote in his diary "believe Japs will fold up before Russia comes in. I am sure they will when Manhattan appears over their homeland", which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work