• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The use of the atomic bomb played an important role in ending the war.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...


'The use of the atomic bomb played an important role in ending the war.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Japan launched a pre-emptive strike, an action intended to prevent attack from US forces by disabling the enemy; on the seventh of December 1941. The Joint Chiefs of Staff confronted the panorama that getting an unconditional surrender from Japan could require invading the Japanese homeland. A number of key Navy and Army Air Force officers led by Fleet Admiral Ernest King, Chief of Naval Operations, and General H. H. "Hap" Arnold, Chief of the Army Air Force, argued that a combination of sea blockade and aerial bombardment could generate a Japanese surrender without the need for a ground invasion. Army Chief of Staff General. George C. Marshall and his Army planners, however, believed that Japan's surrender on the stipulations being demanded by the Allies could only be assured by an invasion of its home territory, although arguably as declared in Truman's memoirs: 'it might cost half a million American lives to force the enemy's surrender on his home ground' also 'we laboured to construct a weapon of such overwhelming force that the enemy could be forced to yield swiftly once we could resort to it.' ...read more.


Truman's' military advisers also discussed the high number of casualties and deaths that would be involved in bringing 'Japan to her knees'. We must also take into account that Truman, was up for re-election, he had to please the public. In this pretext, it does not appear warranted that the atomic bomb was at the US's best interest. Admiral William D. Leaky, chief of staff to Harry S .Truman proclaimed that: "It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan." In this we must remember that it was a memoir published in 1950, although to some extent Admiral Leaky was right in mentioning that. There were several substitutes to considered, using the bomb in a non-combat demonstration that meant dropping the bomb in a deserted place where the Japanese could witness its power, change the U.S demand for unconditional surrender, allowing the entry of the soviets into the war, continuing conventional warfare and pursuing "Japanese peace feelers". Another idea was to give Japan an advance warning of where the bomb was going was to be dropped so that they could move the population out of the area. ...read more.


After analysing the evidence it is clear to me that, that America had numerous reasons not to use the a-bomb. Moreover, the evidence to arrive at this conclusion is bias but still offers reliable evidence. It is my belief that the use of the atomic bomb to bring about the end of World War II was not entirely justified With the many alternatives that were at the United State's disposal and all of the effects that the use of such weapons had on both environment and people for instance from a Japanese account vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhoea with large amounts of blood, purple spots on the skin, bleeding romm the mouth, death', the U.S. motive for dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified, even though in all ,the atomic bomb did give the Japanese an excuse to surrender, and did ultimately play an important part in ending the war. . Dwight D. Eisenhower said in a meeting with Henry Stimson, Secretary of War during WW II, "... the Japanese were ready to surrender and it was not necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Furthermore the lack of Japanese supplies meant that surrender was inevitable. Here we can take that the United States only dropped the atomic bomb for their interests as a world power to demonstrate their supremacy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    This would have satisfied the scientists but the military and political leaders wanted to see it being used in anger. There was a possibility that if the US dropped the bomb then there would be repercussions of a drop in world opinion on the US.

  2. How important was the war at sea

    Now more information about these developed technologies. The first planes were named 'stringbags' because of the use of external bracing and wires. The first planes that were fitted with proper machineguns was in 1915 and they were made so that they did not shoot their own propeller.

  1. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    As a result, by the end of 1943 over 2 million people had volunteered. They took their job very seriously, but were often made fun of, being called 'dads army'. Their jobs were actually very important. They had the job of railways, bridges and airfields.

  2. Why did America drop the atomic bomb on Japan

    He wouldn't have wanted to seem weak and fragile to the world by not attacking back. Therefore with him attacking back it would have appeared he was mentally strong and was not a sissy. I think that the reason for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was, Japan

  1. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    Also, Truman in his memoirs wrote "It was their (the committee) recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy...'We can see no acceptable alternative to direct military use...It was their conclusion that no technical demonstration...would be likely to bring the war to an end".

  2. The research paper that I am going to present is about the "Atomic Bomb ...

    In the first article, which is "Hiroshima", the author John Berger is trying to be as detailed as possible about the chaos, the catastrophe, and also about the tragedy of dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The author within the article give us lot of examples about the

  1. Pros and Cons - The use of the Atomic Bomb.

    Soon after the United States had begun research, Russia also began research. From the beginning of time, man continuously seeks power. It is in our nature. That is the reason that wars are started, to gain more power. Nuclear weapons are the ultimate power, the power to play God.

  2. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    Through hindsight I know that this quote is quiet reliable; it shows that there was hostility between the twp nations which had provoked the bombing. When trying to answer the question (above) and you come across such quotes; you can see the jigsaw taking shape.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work