• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The years between 1914, when the front trench lines were established in 'the race for the sea' and March 1918 when the Allied front lines were broken by the German 'Spring offensives' are assumed to be a time of unchanging, attrition trench warfare.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework The years between 1914, when the front trench lines were established in 'the race for the sea' and March 1918 when the Allied front lines were broken by the German 'Spring offensives' are assumed to be a time of unchanging, attrition trench warfare. The view that many hold is of the powerlessness of the individual soldiers, living in filthy conditions, with the constant threat of being shot. These soldiers would occasionally charge into a firing range where they were cut down, row by row by enemy fire. These soldiers were put in their impossible position by a command group that consisted of men who were too obsessed with their horses and with the 'old' style of war to change and too stop wasting human lives. If you look at the figures that we are given, at the cost of the battles, and the seemingly little gain in land, without looking at the details, it is possible to see how this view is formed. The battle of Neuve Chapelle (1915) cost the British army 13,000 men for only 8 km's gain, Loos where there were 115,000 casualties, both attacks started with seemingly major breakthroughs which came to a stop due to poor communications between the generals and the front line, resulting in the breaking up of units and the lack of support of reserves where they were needed and a small number of German machine guns which were able to keep the entire British army at bay (supposedly it was only 12 machine guns that stopped the British at Neuve Chappelle). At the Somme in just 5-months there were over 420,000 casualties for only 3 miles gain. As part of the 'Nivelle Offensive' Canadian troops used new artillery tactics at the battle of Vimy Ridge to gain a much-needed victory but there were still horrific casualties at points in the line. Later in the year at ypres (known as 'wipers' to the British who struggled with the pronunciation), good victory's, at Messines ...read more.

Middle

The reason the British victories at Aubers Ridge and Neuve Chapelle weren't exploited was because of the breakdown of communications. Once the order to attack had been given there was no way of calling back the troops, the battlefields were too large for voice control as in the past and wireless messaging was 20 years away. The British commanders implemented a change to stop this; they ordered attacks to be in lines, trotting, almost shoulder-to-shoulder, with the equipment the troops needed to carry on the attack carried with them, this seemed like the solution. These new tactics, increased preliminary bombardments followed by 3-5 lines of soldiers were used for the first time at the battle of the Somme. The preliminary bombardment was intended to destroy German resistance before the lines swept into the trenches and killed the remaining Germans before pushing on, remaining in lines, staying organised while being able to push forward. Unfortunately this didn't work, 1 in 3 shells didn't explode and those that did had little effect on the Germans because of changes they had implemented (see below) and because of the affect explained above the wire was not cut and the men trotting forward were mowed down by the enemy machine guns and artillery, the attack was a disaster. Another factor in the defeat was that the Germans had changed their tactics, in direct response to the British heavy bombardment and linear tactics they had changed to a 'defence in depth' strategy which was a trench system which was maybe 4 or 5 trenches deep, with strong positions, usually pill box's and a front line of machine guns while the troops were not packed into the line any more. As a result it took longer for the British to breakthrough the defence and they got stuck in km of trenches and because the Germans were no longer packed shoulder-to-shoulder the artillery had very little effect. ...read more.

Conclusion

The first change was the introduction of the Mark II; these tanks were still used poorly in unfavourable conditions, especially in the swamp of 3rd Ypres where they sunk. However where the land was downhill and flat they could be used effectively such as at St. Julian away from Ypres where they headed a successful attack on a line of pillboxes. Despite their poor start the people in charge of the British army kept their confidence in their ability's and the next change occurred; the Mark IV was introduced, this was more bullet-proof, and by now the tactics had been changed to suit the tanks. They were used in large numbers on un-cratered land that was sloping towards the German trenches at the battle of Cambrai. The tanks quickly broke through the German lines and pushed out into open space Unfortunately the tanks could not carry enough fuel to go for more than 8 hours so these tanks could only go so far before they had to stop. The infantry reserves did not follow the tanks so they were left stranded deep in 'enemy' territory. The Germans quickly won the land back. This was a good demonstration of how tanks had their strong points and could be very effective if used correctly, but they also had their weaknesses that could be exploited. From this, the evidence leads me to believe that there was considerable change in the Fighting methods used by the British army on the Western front; there was also considerable continuity, especially in the end results of the battles. Both sides managed to change their industrial capabilities towards being a war of total war. Unfortunately the changes made by one side were quickly countered by a change made by the other side, this is what lead to the continuation (which was the continuity) of the war and it wasn't until their was no way for the Germans to change to counter the British and French tactics that the war was won. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * Late in the sane year the Test Ban Treaty was signed. This banned all nuclear tests above ground. How important were these developments? * Neither was very important. The Hotline was hardly ever used, and tests in the atmosphere were no longer necessary.

  2. How important was the war at sea

    They all thought that the war would be over by Christmas. They thought that the war would be enjoyable. The recruitment posters were the things that made them think like that. There was already a strong anti-German feeling in the country so all the men wanted to do was just to get rid of them and go home.

  1. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    the sight of discipline in a time of chaos, the impression of energy in an atmosphere of universal hopelessness, seems to have won her over also." However the majority of Nazi supporters were from the Mittelstand (lower middle class). The German Mittelstand was comprised of small businessmen, independent artisans, small shopkeepers and the self-employed.

  2. Diagonal Lines

    A samurai had to obey his emperor and/or shogun. If he made a mistake or he lost the war or he was taken prisoner, he had to commit suicide by cutting out his guts. He also had to meditate while he was fighting, be loyal and worship natural beauty.

  1. Missile Defence

    the United States militarily just as the soviets did during the Cold war. The argument now from the Bush Administration side is the defense system is generally needed to curb the threat from rogue states and terrorist groups such as Al-Qaida. These rogue states include Iraq, Iran, and North Korea.

  2. 1, Select and explain the most important turning points in the first world war ...

    they had failed this push would've been down because of the realty that would have struck them. I also don't particularly think the U.S.A made a huge difference as any other fresh country the size of America would make the same kind of difference to the war.

  1. The human heart.

    deforming people with napalm, and showering whole village with explosives- when these are the people who America want to convince to be on "their side", and "persuade them of a foe's evil nature". Reading this the public would have a lot to think about, they would be worried about their

  2. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    the family now earns 10 times their usual wages and can use the extra money to ensure a better lifestyle. However, Source C also contradict Source A, as in Source A the women mentions that 'We worked twelve hours a day, apart from the journey morning and night.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work