• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can the growing involvement of the United States in Vietnam, in the years 1950-1968, be seen as an ideological crusade against communism?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent can the growing involvement of the United States in Vietnam, in the years 1950-1968, be seen as an ideological crusade against communism? The growing involvement of the US in Vietnam in the years 1950-1968 can be seen as an ideological crusade against communism for various reasons. The main reason being the quagmire theory which increased involvement for presidents and got them further into the 'mud'. Stalemate was also an important factor as it rejected any thought of withdrawal as the US did not want to lose respect/face. The commitment trap made the US become increasingly involved. However, it can be seen that the Cold war caused the US to 'crusade' against communism. US intervention in Vietnam was stimulated by their hatred of communism which was a belief that went against freedom, free trade and democracy, everything the US said they stood for. The US refused and hated communism for many years as it was a threat to security, enterprise and liberty. The particularly disliked the idea of communism spreading even before it's rising. Furthermore, McCarthy's 'red scare' enforced US's very strict capitalist views and its fear of communism spreading and forced a crusade against it. Therefore, in order to ease the threat of communism to the superpower status of the US, the presidents had to seem strong. ...read more.


The US feared the takeover of Vietnam by the USSR because if this was to happen, the USSR would recruit all resources to benefit them and go against America in the Cold war. The US could not let their trading economical interests be jeopardised as the USSR would become increasingly powerful. Each president took one step after another, thinking each step would solve the Vietnam problem. However, the US then got deeper in and therefore it became impossible to leave. Truman was committed to help the French, but as the French could not fight guerrilla tactics, this help kept on increasing as time went on. Therefore, Truman took a step in the 'mud'. Eisenhower continued the commitment without looking into it by setting up SEATO (Southeast Asia treaty organisation). This was to protect South Vietnam; however this created a reliance on American aid, rather than allowing the South Vietnamese to effectively fight the north alone. Kennedy further committed by increasing the number of advisors sent to Vietnam from 3,000 to 12,000, hoping to improve the morale of the ARVN and fortunes, but made them rely further on US help. They sent in helicopters but AP BAC only showed that this led to the ARVN being less active. After Kennedy died, Johnson promised to keep up US commitment as he was not elected as president. ...read more.


It was difficult to turn back once Truman had committed the US to aid Vietnam through France as it would damage they credibility. By refusing the Geneva Accords and setting up MAAG and SEATO, Eisenhower further committed US to Vietnam. As he sent in more military advisers, once they are in South Vietnam, it is difficult to come out. The ARVN were lacking motivation and were bad fighters who needed to be supported or they wouldn't be able to defend US advisers. More and more Americans became actively involved as Kennedy sent in Green Berets and helicopters. Furthermore, as Johnson sends in troops to protect the advisers, this further makes the US become increasingly committed. Overall, there were various steps that made the US involved and committed in Vietnam but they were trapped in the end anyway. To conclude, the growing involvement of the US in Vietnam was highly due to the ideological crusade against communism. The US were committed to Vietnam even though they knew they were not going to win, but wanted to avoid being seen to lose by American voters. Also, due to their ignorance of the situation, each successive president made decisions that furthered their commitment. The cold war shows that the US was adopting a battle against the spread of communism, rather than a battle of ideologies. Overall, it seems that US involvement was fuelled by their hatred of communism. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    Firstly, the amount of debt massed by the French was absurd, over all the major conflicts they accumulated large numbers of debt that they simply couldn't pay back. The reason they couldn't pay them back as easily as the British is because the British had industrialised significantly earlier than France, giving them a stronger economy.

  2. Why did the United States fail to win the Vietnam War?

    Therefore the consensus in favour of US policy had broken down but it was not replaced by a new agreement against the war but by division. In addition, events such as the protests over the invasion of Cambodia in 1970 added to the pressure on the congress to limit the

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    The conquest had as Gillingham writes "reaped tremendous awards. Richard was able to gain vast amounts of booty which the previous ruler Ducus Comenus had bee storing during his reign." In addition to this, Richard was further able to impose a fifty percent capital levy on every Cypriot. The conquest of Cyprus had thus been fiscally a tremendous success.

  2. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    This turbulence in the market can be demonstrated by the number of countries that adopted the gold standard and emphasised that Transvaal gold underpinned the day to day running of the global market. British interest in the Witwatersrand goldfields was so significant that throughout the 1890s Britain accounted for 75

  1. The First English Civil War

    There was no further talk of the concentric advance of three armies on London. The fiery prince and the methodical Earl of Forth (now honoured with the Earldom of Brentford) were at one, at least, in recommending that the Oxford area, with its own garrison and a mobile force, should be the pivot of the field armies' operations.

  2. Notes on Cleopatra and her links with Rome

    Cleopatra VII and her younger brother Ptolemy XIII were announced joint-rulers after Ptolemy XII Auletes' death. "The young joint-rulers, who married one another" did not have an equal alliance, as shown by archaeological evidence.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    By 1087 the Italians ousted Muslims from southern Italy and Sicily, founded settlement in North Africa and took control of the western Mediterranean Sea. They have made the sea and ground incursions into Muslim territories in North Africa, and got their trading privileges by force.

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Following the victory, the Congress leaders who had been in favour of the provincial part of the 1935 Act, pushed forward with it with the condition that, ?the leader of the Congress party in the legislature is satisfied and is able to state publicly that the Governor will not use

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work