• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others? In the process of German unification, it is possible to see that Bismarck played a significant role. It is easy with hindsight to see the mistakes that were made during the process. What is certain that the situation however, is that mistakes were made. With this in mind it can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Middle

The mistake was that the French has publicly accused Prussia of allowing Leopold to take the throne and threatening France. This public accusation meant that Bismarck could not just ignore it or quietly work out a solution. Instead he had to refute the French accusation in order to keep the Prussians happy. The second mistake by the French was that after the withdrawal of the candidate, the French ambassador had a meeting with King Wilhelm; in short the French implied a lack of faith in the Prussian monarch and to try to embarrass Prussia. However a telegram from the king to Bismarck about the meeting was edited by Bismarck and released to the press, it portrayed the French in a bad light. Thus it was this final act that lead to the Franco-Prussian war. The mistake to publicly accuse Prussia and then to try and humiliate Prussia after the event had been Frances mistakes and played into Bismarck's hands that took advantage of the situation and manipulated it to his benefit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example where the skill of Bismarck is apparent is in 1864, Bismarck wanted to remove Austrian influence in the North German Confederation and in 1864 Austria agreed to a division of influence in Germany. Yet on a personal scale possibly Bismarck's greatest success was at the very beginning, despite the king's thoughts Bismarck was bought in to sort out the constitutional crisis. It was a complicated situation and Bismarck was well aware that if he did solve it and quickly there would be little need for him in the future. Some historians have said that Bismarck took his time in solving the problems and it could have been achieved earlier. If this is true then it shows his cleverness, not only did he manage to solve the constitutional crisis, get the backing of the liberals and nationalist, remove some Austrian influence and gain more power, he stayed in power and became important to King Wilhelm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Soult's lack of skills was one of the reasons for Napoleon's loss. Davout was Napoleon's most capable marshal. He had fought along with Napoleon in Egypt and Austerlitz and was thought to be almost Napoleon's equal in military strategies

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Napoleon's Strength - the Civil Aspect * When Napoleon became First Consul, he took over the existing ministry of war, expanded it and made it more efficient. It was reorganised into two separate ministries, one dealing with the army itself (conscription, promotions, troop movements and the like)

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    Prussia had many generals of a decent standard, another is General von Roon. It wouldn't be prudent to say that the French had unless generals and poor officers because this is not the case, it was just that Prussia was superior in terms of leadership because of experience and Prussian military academies.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    the fascists, for example Marshall Diaz is reported to have told him "the army will do its duty; however it would be well not to put it to the test"11 The King also feared that his cousin, The Duke of Aosta who was near the Fascist headquarters in Perugia may have been after the crown.

  1. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    Despite the war there was till a considerable number of people who did not favour the prospect of unification. Bismarck used his skilful politics once again by more or less telling the Kings and Dukes of the German states to either unify or be overthrown.

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    The Zollverein was set up in 1818 and it was a customs union within Prussia's own territories and by 1834 it had become an all-German customs union established under Prussian leadership. The Zollverein allowed trade between 39 German states through a tariff system for the movement of goods around Germany.

  1. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    was initially disappointed with the lack of damage at the start of raiding operations. Many Army personnel were unhappy too, with the Commando idea because the Commandos were creaming off the best leaders and fighting talent within the regiments. The way they went about their training was revolutionary and radical

  2. Unification of Germany - Factors of Success.

    Lesson?? of 1848 Revolution: Nationalism and liberalism went hand in hand during the 1848 Revolution. The Frankfurt Assembly?????? organized by unarmed???? and idealistic professors and university students attempted in vain?? to create a liberal and united Germany. Henceforth??, nationalism, or better say, Realpolitik????, instead of liberalism, became the chief driving force??

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work