• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others? In the process of German unification, it is possible to see that Bismarck played a significant role. It is easy with hindsight to see the mistakes that were made during the process. What is certain that the situation however, is that mistakes were made. With this in mind it can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Middle

The mistake was that the French has publicly accused Prussia of allowing Leopold to take the throne and threatening France. This public accusation meant that Bismarck could not just ignore it or quietly work out a solution. Instead he had to refute the French accusation in order to keep the Prussians happy. The second mistake by the French was that after the withdrawal of the candidate, the French ambassador had a meeting with King Wilhelm; in short the French implied a lack of faith in the Prussian monarch and to try to embarrass Prussia. However a telegram from the king to Bismarck about the meeting was edited by Bismarck and released to the press, it portrayed the French in a bad light. Thus it was this final act that lead to the Franco-Prussian war. The mistake to publicly accuse Prussia and then to try and humiliate Prussia after the event had been Frances mistakes and played into Bismarck's hands that took advantage of the situation and manipulated it to his benefit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example where the skill of Bismarck is apparent is in 1864, Bismarck wanted to remove Austrian influence in the North German Confederation and in 1864 Austria agreed to a division of influence in Germany. Yet on a personal scale possibly Bismarck's greatest success was at the very beginning, despite the king's thoughts Bismarck was bought in to sort out the constitutional crisis. It was a complicated situation and Bismarck was well aware that if he did solve it and quickly there would be little need for him in the future. Some historians have said that Bismarck took his time in solving the problems and it could have been achieved earlier. If this is true then it shows his cleverness, not only did he manage to solve the constitutional crisis, get the backing of the liberals and nationalist, remove some Austrian influence and gain more power, he stayed in power and became important to King Wilhelm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Soult's lack of skills was one of the reasons for Napoleon's loss. Davout was Napoleon's most capable marshal. He had fought along with Napoleon in Egypt and Austerlitz and was thought to be almost Napoleon's equal in military strategies

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    supported by his actions as chancellor of Prussia, and it is unsurprising that only two years after his words to Disraeli, in 1864, a war occurred, not with Austria, but with Denmark, wherein Prussia gained Schleswig and Nordfriesland, and Austria, an ally in that war, gained Holstein.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    His normal strategy was to keep at least one of these major powers as an ally while be dealt with the others. i) The Second Coalition 1799 * In the spring of 1799 the second coalition of Britain, Russia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire was at war with France.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    be absorbed into a coalition and invited Salandra and Mussolini to form the next government. Mussolini was well aware of this plan as on the 17th October he said "they would like to imprison me; joining a government would be the liquidation of Fascism" 12Mussolini refused the offer and Salandra was unable to form a government.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    The Prussian army was much more experienced than the French army. Prussia had been involved in and won two wars during the 1860's and therefore had veterans who would have served in the Seven Weeks War and generals who would have defeated the Austrians so effectively, e.g. Helmut von Molke.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    that gave rise to criminal activities on a large scale, he denies that all Germans were collectively guilty of the crimes committed by the Nazis. For crimes one can punish only individuals; a whole nation cannot be charged with a crime."

  1. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    Industrialisation, centred mainly on Prussia, increased the links between the states, which were dependent upon one another for raw materials and trade. This was boosted further by the creation of the Zollverein. This abolished all internal duties and lowered all import duties.

  2. Unification of Germany - Factors of Success.

    Lesson?? of 1848 Revolution: Nationalism and liberalism went hand in hand during the 1848 Revolution. The Frankfurt Assembly?????? organized by unarmed???? and idealistic professors and university students attempted in vain?? to create a liberal and united Germany. Henceforth??, nationalism, or better say, Realpolitik????, instead of liberalism, became the chief driving force??

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work