• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others? In the process of German unification, it is possible to see that Bismarck played a significant role. It is easy with hindsight to see the mistakes that were made during the process. What is certain that the situation however, is that mistakes were made. With this in mind it can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Middle

The mistake was that the French has publicly accused Prussia of allowing Leopold to take the throne and threatening France. This public accusation meant that Bismarck could not just ignore it or quietly work out a solution. Instead he had to refute the French accusation in order to keep the Prussians happy. The second mistake by the French was that after the withdrawal of the candidate, the French ambassador had a meeting with King Wilhelm; in short the French implied a lack of faith in the Prussian monarch and to try to embarrass Prussia. However a telegram from the king to Bismarck about the meeting was edited by Bismarck and released to the press, it portrayed the French in a bad light. Thus it was this final act that lead to the Franco-Prussian war. The mistake to publicly accuse Prussia and then to try and humiliate Prussia after the event had been Frances mistakes and played into Bismarck's hands that took advantage of the situation and manipulated it to his benefit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example where the skill of Bismarck is apparent is in 1864, Bismarck wanted to remove Austrian influence in the North German Confederation and in 1864 Austria agreed to a division of influence in Germany. Yet on a personal scale possibly Bismarck's greatest success was at the very beginning, despite the king's thoughts Bismarck was bought in to sort out the constitutional crisis. It was a complicated situation and Bismarck was well aware that if he did solve it and quickly there would be little need for him in the future. Some historians have said that Bismarck took his time in solving the problems and it could have been achieved earlier. If this is true then it shows his cleverness, not only did he manage to solve the constitutional crisis, get the backing of the liberals and nationalist, remove some Austrian influence and gain more power, he stayed in power and became important to King Wilhelm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Soult's lack of skills was one of the reasons for Napoleon's loss. Davout was Napoleon's most capable marshal. He had fought along with Napoleon in Egypt and Austerlitz and was thought to be almost Napoleon's equal in military strategies

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    It was a situation not enjoyed by any enemy general. * Military expenditure was enormous. Conquered territories were exploited to make the army self-sufficient. Troops were quartered on annexed or occupied lands. Huge indemnities were demanded from defeated countries as part of the price of peace.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    should be included, leading to the theoretical ideals of Gro�deutschland, inclusive of Austria, and Kleindeutschland, excluding the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The dual administration of the territories gained from Denmark caused strain between the two nations, culminating with Prussian occupation of Austrian territories in Holstein, and mobilisation of Austrian forces against Prussia.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    be absorbed into a coalition and invited Salandra and Mussolini to form the next government. Mussolini was well aware of this plan as on the 17th October he said "they would like to imprison me; joining a government would be the liquidation of Fascism" 12Mussolini refused the offer and Salandra was unable to form a government.

  1. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    The Prussian success in the 3 wars was essential in the unification of Germany. Bismarck skilful diplomacy and strength of character were crucial in all of the 3 circumstances. The army reforms triggered by Bismarck begun the development of the iron and coal industries in the Rhineland and the steel industry.

  2. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    The task force also sank shipping totalling 15,000 tons and destroyed four aircraft. 150 Germans were killed and 98 taken prisoner at a cost of some 51 dead, 71 wounded and 12 aircraft lost. The Press Unit had been very active during the raid and some of the most graphic and dramatic photographs in World War Two were taken.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    the throne to Leopold Hohenzollen-Sigmarinen ( a catholic cousin of William I). A Prussian on the Spain would enforce the threat posed by Prussia on France. Napoleon III saw this and viewed it as a Prussian attempt to encircle France.

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    The Zollverein was set up in 1818 and it was a customs union within Prussia's own territories and by 1834 it had become an all-German customs union established under Prussian leadership. The Zollverein allowed trade between 39 German states through a tariff system for the movement of goods around Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work