• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others? In the process of German unification, it is possible to see that Bismarck played a significant role. It is easy with hindsight to see the mistakes that were made during the process. What is certain that the situation however, is that mistakes were made. With this in mind it can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Middle

The mistake was that the French has publicly accused Prussia of allowing Leopold to take the throne and threatening France. This public accusation meant that Bismarck could not just ignore it or quietly work out a solution. Instead he had to refute the French accusation in order to keep the Prussians happy. The second mistake by the French was that after the withdrawal of the candidate, the French ambassador had a meeting with King Wilhelm; in short the French implied a lack of faith in the Prussian monarch and to try to embarrass Prussia. However a telegram from the king to Bismarck about the meeting was edited by Bismarck and released to the press, it portrayed the French in a bad light. Thus it was this final act that lead to the Franco-Prussian war. The mistake to publicly accuse Prussia and then to try and humiliate Prussia after the event had been Frances mistakes and played into Bismarck's hands that took advantage of the situation and manipulated it to his benefit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example where the skill of Bismarck is apparent is in 1864, Bismarck wanted to remove Austrian influence in the North German Confederation and in 1864 Austria agreed to a division of influence in Germany. Yet on a personal scale possibly Bismarck's greatest success was at the very beginning, despite the king's thoughts Bismarck was bought in to sort out the constitutional crisis. It was a complicated situation and Bismarck was well aware that if he did solve it and quickly there would be little need for him in the future. Some historians have said that Bismarck took his time in solving the problems and it could have been achieved earlier. If this is true then it shows his cleverness, not only did he manage to solve the constitutional crisis, get the backing of the liberals and nationalist, remove some Austrian influence and gain more power, he stayed in power and became important to King Wilhelm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Soult's lack of skills was one of the reasons for Napoleon's loss. Davout was Napoleon's most capable marshal. He had fought along with Napoleon in Egypt and Austerlitz and was thought to be almost Napoleon's equal in military strategies

  2. The Role of Bismarck in the German Confederation

    over most of the German confederation, except Austria who had refused to join the economic union, granting Prussia a perfect opportunity. After a period of quiet social and economic rearranging, revolutions were triggered by Metternich's and Louis-Philippe fall throughout Germany.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    due to its defeat, clearly had great influence on what became Germany as we know it today. Although Austria and Germany were unified under the Nazis, Austria is still not a part of the Germany with which we are so familiar, the Kleindeutschland.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    They were a break with eighteenth-century tradition, and confusing to the opposition. * Given his hold over his men and the incapacity of his enemies to match him and his army, his victories multiplied rapidly. * If his career had finished in 1807, then Napoleon would have been considered one of the most undisputed great generals.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    Prussia had many generals of a decent standard, another is General von Roon. It wouldn't be prudent to say that the French had unless generals and poor officers because this is not the case, it was just that Prussia was superior in terms of leadership because of experience and Prussian military academies.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Facta resigned over the King's failure to sign the decree, eliminating another of Mussolini's rivals for power. Salandra had advised the king not to sign as he thought this would lead to a new government headed by him. Like many of the Liberal Politicians the King believed that Mussolini could

  1. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    In 1869 the Spanish government was looking for a constitutional monarch. Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen was a relative of the Prussian Hohenzollen family and he was a Roman catholic. King William of Prussia argued against this as it was seen as a threat to the French, which was exactly what Bismarck was hoping for.

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    The Zollverein was set up in 1818 and it was a customs union within Prussia's own territories and by 1834 it had become an all-German customs union established under Prussian leadership. The Zollverein allowed trade between 39 German states through a tariff system for the movement of goods around Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work