• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others? In the process of German unification, it is possible to see that Bismarck played a significant role. It is easy with hindsight to see the mistakes that were made during the process. What is certain that the situation however, is that mistakes were made. With this in mind it can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Middle

The mistake was that the French has publicly accused Prussia of allowing Leopold to take the throne and threatening France. This public accusation meant that Bismarck could not just ignore it or quietly work out a solution. Instead he had to refute the French accusation in order to keep the Prussians happy. The second mistake by the French was that after the withdrawal of the candidate, the French ambassador had a meeting with King Wilhelm; in short the French implied a lack of faith in the Prussian monarch and to try to embarrass Prussia. However a telegram from the king to Bismarck about the meeting was edited by Bismarck and released to the press, it portrayed the French in a bad light. Thus it was this final act that lead to the Franco-Prussian war. The mistake to publicly accuse Prussia and then to try and humiliate Prussia after the event had been Frances mistakes and played into Bismarck's hands that took advantage of the situation and manipulated it to his benefit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example where the skill of Bismarck is apparent is in 1864, Bismarck wanted to remove Austrian influence in the North German Confederation and in 1864 Austria agreed to a division of influence in Germany. Yet on a personal scale possibly Bismarck's greatest success was at the very beginning, despite the king's thoughts Bismarck was bought in to sort out the constitutional crisis. It was a complicated situation and Bismarck was well aware that if he did solve it and quickly there would be little need for him in the future. Some historians have said that Bismarck took his time in solving the problems and it could have been achieved earlier. If this is true then it shows his cleverness, not only did he manage to solve the constitutional crisis, get the backing of the liberals and nationalist, remove some Austrian influence and gain more power, he stayed in power and became important to King Wilhelm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Soult's lack of skills was one of the reasons for Napoleon's loss. Davout was Napoleon's most capable marshal. He had fought along with Napoleon in Egypt and Austerlitz and was thought to be almost Napoleon's equal in military strategies

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    on other occasions, the crossing of the Oder in 1806 for instance. * Sometimes out of sheer obstinacy, as at Boulogne in 1805, he refused advice from those who knew better than to underestimate as he did the dangers to his ships from tide and weather.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Others may just as equally have been responsible as Napol�on for the founding of Germany as we know it today, especially with the founding of the German Confederation in June 1815, just two months after Otto Eduard von Bismarck- Sch�nhausen was born on the 1st of April, 1815.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Even as the natural enemies of the Fascists, the left did very little to prevent them entering government and often, as shown by the Alliance of Labour strike, their attempts even helped the Fascists. Even with the limited opposition, the Fascists were by no means unbeatable and in 1922 Mussolini's authority within the party was incredibly weak.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    the diplomatic climate between Prussia and France at this time, any dispute of this kind would have caused a war. The peace was so fragile in 1869, because of French desperation and Prussian ambition, that the smallest clash would have sparked a war, you can see this through the French reaction to the Ems Telegram.

  2. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    The Zollverein was set up in 1818 and it was a customs union within Prussia's own territories and by 1834 it had become an all-German customs union established under Prussian leadership. The Zollverein allowed trade between 39 German states through a tariff system for the movement of goods around Germany.

  1. Unification of Germany - Factors of Success.

    but by blood and iron." Besides, that Prussia did not abolish the liberal constitution granted in 1848 made her popular with Germans. d. Rise of William I: In 1861 King Federick William IV??????? died and was succeeded by William I. He never forgot the humiliation??

  2. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    Industrialisation, centred mainly on Prussia, increased the links between the states, which were dependent upon one another for raw materials and trade. This was boosted further by the creation of the Zollverein. This abolished all internal duties and lowered all import duties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work