• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Bismarck's success depend on the mistakes of others? In the process of German unification, it is possible to see that Bismarck played a significant role. It is easy with hindsight to see the mistakes that were made during the process. What is certain that the situation however, is that mistakes were made. With this in mind it can be argued that Bismarck was able to capitalise on the mistakes of his opponents in order to unify Germany. An example of when Bismarck was able to do this was in 1864 with the Schleswig-Holstein situation. The combined forces of Austria and Prussia entered Schleswig-Holstein to face the Danish forces. Prussian nationalists, who favoured the grossdeutsch idea, were in favour of this action as the Germany speaking people in Schleswig-Holstein were to be freed from Danish control and put under Prussian control. However the situation that occurred was that Schleswig and Holstein were split between Prussia and Austria. ...read more.

Middle

The mistake was that the French has publicly accused Prussia of allowing Leopold to take the throne and threatening France. This public accusation meant that Bismarck could not just ignore it or quietly work out a solution. Instead he had to refute the French accusation in order to keep the Prussians happy. The second mistake by the French was that after the withdrawal of the candidate, the French ambassador had a meeting with King Wilhelm; in short the French implied a lack of faith in the Prussian monarch and to try to embarrass Prussia. However a telegram from the king to Bismarck about the meeting was edited by Bismarck and released to the press, it portrayed the French in a bad light. Thus it was this final act that lead to the Franco-Prussian war. The mistake to publicly accuse Prussia and then to try and humiliate Prussia after the event had been Frances mistakes and played into Bismarck's hands that took advantage of the situation and manipulated it to his benefit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example where the skill of Bismarck is apparent is in 1864, Bismarck wanted to remove Austrian influence in the North German Confederation and in 1864 Austria agreed to a division of influence in Germany. Yet on a personal scale possibly Bismarck's greatest success was at the very beginning, despite the king's thoughts Bismarck was bought in to sort out the constitutional crisis. It was a complicated situation and Bismarck was well aware that if he did solve it and quickly there would be little need for him in the future. Some historians have said that Bismarck took his time in solving the problems and it could have been achieved earlier. If this is true then it shows his cleverness, not only did he manage to solve the constitutional crisis, get the backing of the liberals and nationalist, remove some Austrian influence and gain more power, he stayed in power and became important to King Wilhelm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Soult's lack of skills was one of the reasons for Napoleon's loss. Davout was Napoleon's most capable marshal. He had fought along with Napoleon in Egypt and Austerlitz and was thought to be almost Napoleon's equal in military strategies

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * As a result, Napoleon decided that if France was to have peace, he would have to impose it, but to do this he would have to defeat one of the allies first. Therefore he embarked on a second Italian campaign aimed against Austria, and forced her to accept humiliating

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    supported by his actions as chancellor of Prussia, and it is unsurprising that only two years after his words to Disraeli, in 1864, a war occurred, not with Austria, but with Denmark, wherein Prussia gained Schleswig and Nordfriesland, and Austria, an ally in that war, gained Holstein.

  2. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    as the needle gun, which gave them the upper hand in combat due to its accuracy and quicker loading time. The enemy was of no match for the heavy Krupps artillery. This encouraged new military thinking by Von Roon and Von Moltke.

  1. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    In February 1942, men of the newly formed British 1st Airborne Division (Members of No.2 Commando) went into action for the first time. In one of the most daring raids of the war (Operation Biting), they seized, and brought back to England, vital components of a German 'Wurzburg' radar installation situated near Bruneval (France).

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    The Pact of Pacification between the Fascists and Socialist Unions was rejected by several of the ras and there were calls for Mussolini to be removed from leadership and for him to be replaced by D'Annunzio who refused to act.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    rocky, France prompted by failed diplomacy and Prussia with her aims for Germany make this issue from succession dispute to a major cause of a bloody war. The Spanish Succession Crisis brings together a number of long term causes, French expansionism, French failure, Bismarck's aims for south Germany, Prussia's growth

  2. The Role of Bismarck in the German Confederation

    Solid liberal constitution rights had been created, the territorial claims were considered. This created a problem as there was "no logical definition of Germany.", also containing the conflict of a Gross oder Kleindeutschland. After a short struggle a constitution was created in 1849, which was however not recognized by the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work