• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the 1855-1964 period?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the 1855-1964 period? When the February revolution brought an end to Tsarist rule, there was a strong belief that the instatement of the Provisional Government would lead to a more democratic Russia. However in deposing the Provisional Government, the October Revolution had removed any such hope. The totalitarian Government of the Communist Party continued and intensified many aspects of the Tsarist regime including use of the secret police and an intolerance for opposition and democracy in general. The communist regime were just as authoritarian as the Tsars before them. In terms of ideology the fall of Tsarism in 1917 was a significant event as Tsarist belief in total control and centralisation of power was replaced by the Provisional Government, who had introduced liberal reforms and aimed for a democratic Russia. Ideology came to have a far more significant impact under the communists. It was not completely absent under Tsarist rule as the Russification policy of Alexander III shows, however it had virtually no effect in comparison to Stalin's purges. ...read more.


Nicholas II also took this approach in the October Manifesto, the Duma was in theory a step towards democracy but much like Lenin's NEP, was implemented in an authoritarian way to limit the effect on power. The Communists introduced reforms, and concessions where necessary, in order to maintain their authority, such as Lenin's abandonment of war communism for NEP, whereas the Tsars took the same approach by only introducing reform when pressurised as Alexander II's assassination, and his prior implementation of the Emancipation Act shows. The regimes displayed their authoritarian nature in different ways, Lenin saw that war communism was not working and replaced it with NEP, whereas Alexander III put his stamp on Russia by reversing all of his father's reforms. There was also continuity in the nature of Government with the Communists retaining a strong belief in personal authority, Lenin retained all key decisions as the Tsars did before him. Both Communist and Tsarist Governments developed into authoritarian regimes because their authority was largely unchallenged once established. The removal of Khrushchev by the Central Committee and the abdication of Nicholas II in 1917 by comparison were insignificant as neither event managed to have a significant impact on the nature of Russian Government. ...read more.


Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies of the peasantry and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. Tsars had also used military force in containing opponents, with Stolypin's necktie under Nicholas II and Alexander II continually employing military force prior to the Emancipation Act. The army was very important to the state, as the 1905 revolution demonstrated, and their continuing use of force against opponents is one way in which they successfully maintain their authoritarian regimes. When the February Revolution brought an end to Tsardom, the newly instated Provisional Government aimed to bring a new age of democracy Russia. However the instatement of the communists in the October Revolution ensured that in the long term, Russia simply exchanged one authoritarian regime for another. Lenin defended his revolution in the Civil War and went on to continue and intensify many aspects of Tsarist autocracy, which Stalin would continue. This ensured that the communist regime was just as authoritarian as the Tsars had been before them, and they were more effective in doing so. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    High taxes were commonplace under the Tsars despite the axing of redemption payments in 1905, however in contrast Lenin's NEP ensured that such a heavy burden would not be repeated. Despite this advancement, the most heavy restrictions were seen under Stalin where the relentless use of power, paranoia and hostility led to an unprecedented scale of death and destruction.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Managers of industries who did not meet their targets for production. * Scientists, engineers, experts of any kind who Stalin did not trust or understand. Only loyal party officials, who accepted Stalin's decision without question, were safe. * Army and Navy officers; every Admiral of the Soviet fleet, three

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    They were intended to rival the NAPOLAs and to avoid Rust's interference. Only 11 were created. They were free boarding schools for 12 to 18 year olds and the students were selected on physical appearance and leadership potential. Physical, political, and military training were even more dominant- Nazi leaders did not send their own children there.

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    reluctantly implementing the Emancipation Act show that this was a continual theme throughout the period. Stalin's hand had also been forced, as the driving force behind Russia's vast industrialisation process was his fear of Germany, as opposed to benefitting the Russian state.

  1. Assess the view that Russias communist leaders did less than the Tsars to improve ...

    pace as to how they worked, and therefore how much they produced. In most cases, this meant they had to work as hard as possible in order to provide food for their families, as well as the requisition squads which Lenin would later introduce in an attempt to improve productivity.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    Although this would ultimately prove unsuccessful it was another example of control and subversion. It is also important to remember that many of the peasants, particularly the better treated workers on royal land, still held to the concept of the Csar as the 'little father' and laid all their problems at the door of the bureaucrats - not Nicholas.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    the articles is that the authors saw the actions by Stalin and the Communist Party to be ruthless. The reaction in the UK, particularly London, was completely different to the reaction in the USA and Canada. In the newspaper called The Times, there were a number of articles, that were

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    The Bolshevik Party had a strict internal hierarchy, and believed that each person should earn the same amount of money, regardless of the job or social position that the person had. This idea seems very closely tied to Communism which it really is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work