• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between 1815-71?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between 1815-71? In 1815, 'Germany' of the German confederation was little more than a cluster of 39 different states, yet by 1871 the freshly proclaimed German Empire was in existence. What led to this transformation? The traditionalist Heinrich Treitsch, 1834-1896 believed that Prussia was predestined to play the central role in achieving unification. That Bismarck was the statesman of genius, whose diplomacy created the circumstances in which Prussia and the German people could triumph. Whilst H. B�hme argues an economic approach, as the memorandum written by the Prussian Finance Minister Motz in June 1829 states, "political unity" was a "necessary consequence of commercial unity". Economic factors were of greater importance than the events of 1864, 1866, and 1870. A more revisionist interpretation is that taken by A.J.P.Taylor in the 1950's, that both, the economy and Bismarck's opportunism, rather than his skills as a master planner, led to unification. But of the all factors involved in creating Germany, was that of the economy vital in accounting for German unification? J.M.Keynes argues that the key factor, which expanded rapidly the population and so allowed industrialization to go ahead leading to German unification, was primarily due to the Zollverien, the German customs league. As Keynes famously stated, in 1919, "The German Empire was not founded on blood and iron, but coal and iron". Bismarck used the union as "an economic carrot and stick for political ends"1. ...read more.

Middle

As an American general put it, it was the knack of getting there "fustest with the mostest"11. Which in turn leads us directly back to the development of the railways and consequently founded on the foundation of the Zollverein, inherent to Germany's economic success. So the economic and financial strength of Prussia gave her the military resources she needed to challenge first Austria and then France. In 1893 Bismarck insinuates in his memoirs12 that from the start he had worked for the unification of Germany, which implies that the economic and military factors were of less importance. However Bismarck does have an ulterior motive when writing this. He will wish to heighten his responsibility for unification to emerge as the hero of Germany and the fatherlands most patriotic figure. Yet there is other evidence to reinforce this contention: for instance the remarks he is supposed to have made on a visit to London during the summer of 1862, when at a dinner party he spelled out to Disraeli more or less what subsequently happened. He said that when he was in charge he would initiate the reform of the army, find a pretext for war with Austria and destroy the Bund.13 Unfortunately, since the source of this is neither reliable, as it's authenticity can be questioned as it as anonymous eyewitness written a lot later than the event with the benefit of hindsight, it is open to question, quite apart from it's own inherent improbability. ...read more.

Conclusion

G.A. Craig highlighted the importance that the military had in enabling German unification, for Germany as Craig maintained was essentially built out of the two wars of 1966 and 1970. Bismarck's diplomacy and manipulation of those wars obviously was also vital for German unification, without it anarchy could have resulted within the German Confederation. Bismarck and the traditional approach, written before the First World War, maintained the use of the prosperous economy was all part of an orchestrated plan. Though we know that this opinion was used firstly by Bismarck to emphasis his role in achieving German unity but also to generate more German patriotism. Leaving the economic factors as the foundation for German unification which is the argument most closely followed by modern historians writing in the last twenty years. Without any timely social pressures to discredit any of the factors involved and mostly allowing it to be objective, without bias. 1 Bruce Waller, Germany independence and unification with power, (1985), p.113 2 Michael Gorman, The unification of Germany, (1989), P.34 3 Translation in English of F.List, 'Schriften, Reden, Briefe, (1959), p.331 4 Harold James, A German identity 1770-1990, p.58 5 J.G. Droysen, Politishe Schriften, ed. F. Gilbert, (1933) p.353 6 Harold James, A German Identity 1770-1990,(1989) p.59 7 H.B�hme, 8 Blackbourne, 9 G.A. Craig. Germany1866-1945, p.56 10 Ibid, 11 Bruce Waller, Germeny, independence and unification with power, (1989), p.114 12 O.W.Bismark, 13 Bruce Waller Bismarck (1989), p.21 14 A.J.P.Taylor, 15 W.Carr, A History of Germany1815-199,p.181 16 A. Farmer, Nineteenth Century European History 1815-191, p.167 17 Terry Eagleton Marx, (1997), p.49 18 Terry Eagleton Marx, (1997) p.50 19 William Carr, A history of Germany 1815-1990,(1969), p.83 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    Bismarck's actions during the Danish war of 1864 were intentionally manufactured to manoeuvre Austria into open confrontation with Prussia as a way of settling the problem of leadership in Germany. Bismarck knew he could pick a quarrel with Austria over Holstein any time he wanted.

  2. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    You could clearly see the regional differences in 1848, they are still visible today but not as clearly. Also, Germany is the 2nd largest country in Europe so it would have been difficult to traverse in 1848 so for example an average man from Danzig, Prussia, would not easily be

  1. To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important ...

    Again we see Bismarck playing a huge influence. Even though the king did not want war Bismarck went behind his back and provoked the French into war. He even sent �50,000 secretly to annoy the French by getting Leopold in power.

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    is not merely a scientific or stylistic problem but also a moral one'13 The general opinion in present time, is that Hitler genuinely believed what he was dictating. (In 1979, the historian KD Bracher argued that Hitler was an ideologue, propelled to self-destruction by his ideology.

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    As the Zollverein was dominated by Prussia, it meant that Prussia had significant sway over the economies of states present in the Zollverein. Throughout the Bund, the German states we using Prussian set currencies and tariffs. This shows that Prussia was economically dominant in the Bund from 1834 up until the formal unification in 1871.

  2. "To What Extent Can Bismarck Claim The Credit For German Unification".

    Industrialisation, centred mainly on Prussia, increased the links between the states, which were dependent upon one another for raw materials and trade. This was boosted further by the creation of the Zollverein. This abolished all internal duties and lowered all import duties.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Hitler cultivated this gift of memory assiduously. The fact that subsequently the details and figures which he cited were often found to contain inaccuracies did not matter: it was the immediate effect at which he aimed. The swiftness of the transition from one mood to another was startling: one moment

  2. To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from ...

    In this, he argues that in a new age of Religious textual understanding and enlightenment, the Reformation damaged the existent understanding of the Christian faith and returned it to a more petty and confused comprehension. This could go some way to explaining the Religious violence in the period.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work