• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the Conflict perspective on US history challenge the concept of American Exceptionalism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does the Conflict perspective on US history challenge the concept of American Exceptionalism? The USA is perhaps the only country in the world where by its own admission, citizenship is a state of mind. To explain this it is necessary to compare it to my own British citizenship. One of my grandfathers' hails from Northern Ireland, the other from Wales. The fact that I was born in England and my relatives are from other UK countries makes us all British. In the case of the US, being an American is not due to ethnic origin or place of birth, but a belief to a set of ideals and a constitution. In this sense it is possible for any American to stop being an American by not holding true to these ideals and the US itself. This is the basis for the concept of American Exceptionalism. It is also not difficult to see the economic, political and cultural factors which may be used in the argument for American Exceptionalism. Many Americans see the good fortune of their own country as putting it in the position of having a 'unique mission in the world'1. ...read more.

Middle

The other school of thinking is that of consensus theory, where history progresses through peaceful continuity; and politics are always consensual. It is now necessary to apply these perspectives to American history, see which is prevalent and if a synthesis between the two can be created, and then assess whether or not the idea of American Exceptionalism is viable given the contradiction of the conflict perspective. The key difficulty in using the conflict and consensus perspectives is that they can not be picked or chosen. The US historian Hartz undertook a study on US society. He found that the study "does not permit us to choose between "conflict" or "consensus"...American history contains both of these elements in the proportions which make it, in relation to other national histories, explicable"3 The first thing to be looked at is groups of people in the USA. Affiliations or member groups in the USA are interest groups. These fall into the conflict perspective as interest groups protect consumer rights and empower members. This does not challenge exceptionalism however as it demonstrates Americas pluralistic society in action, definitely a factor of American exceptionalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

American political traditions must be looked at using a synthesis of the two perspectives. Although there is clear conflict in politics, there is also a deeper consensus of opinion. Even though a synthesis of the two must be used, this definitely challenges American exceptionalism as all western liberal democracies are similar. In looking at the USA, it is clear to see that there are two different types of synthesis to be compiled from the conflict/consensus perspectives. The first is drawn from dealing with social structure and political groups. There may be visible conflict all the time but there is a deeper underlying consensus. This means that the ends are agreed upon but not the means, a superficial conflict. After looking at affiliated groups, history and the nature of change in the US I believe that it is more the other way around, that there has been an underlying conflict in US history, which is given the appearance of consensus due to compromise. This does challenge American exceptionalism, although not to the extent I originally believed. American politics, history and the bloody nature of change offer nothing to call different or exceptional in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Arab-Israeli Conflict 1948-1996.

    A plan that would take place over five years would see the withdrawal of Israeli military and the creation of a self-governing Arab authority. The second accord was not as successful and effective as the first, because of the disagreement from the Arab leaders.

  2. To what extent did the Vietnam War impact upon US domestic politics and society ...

    Harrison Salisbury was from the respected New York Times. He reported on the destruction to civilian areas and the many civilian casualties caused by American bombing raids. This would have had a very negative impact upon US society as it represented the war as criminal and evil. The United Sates military had always denied that their bombs hit civilian casualties, they claimed, then there weren't many of them.

  1. American History.

    Bacon's Rebellion - why did it occur? - Around the same time, Virginians also experienced conflict w/the Indians b/c of land, although the conflict played out slightly differently. After land-hungry Virginians attacked two Indians tribes, Indians raided outlying farms in retaliation in the winter of 1676.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    The Zionists later lodged a bomb in the King David Hotel which was the British headquarters in Jerusalem. The sustained violent attacks of the terrorist groups forced Britain to proclaim that the problem was now being handed over to the recently shaped United Nations (UN).

  1. Examine the main premises behind Eisenhower's concept of containment

    Foster-Dulles was in favour of this approach commenting on the need to give the Chinese "one hell of a licking"4. Ike soon changed his favour to what was to become a staple tactic of his, a public warning to the Chinese and Russians that America was prepared to move "decisively without inhibition" in their use of "weapons".

  2. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    One group went to the peasants, but were not successful in gathering support, this was mainly because the peasants were under the influence of the church, and this meant that many of them were loyal to the Tsar. Another problem was that their desire for social change didn't extend much

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    For seventeen months Casey had been throwing assets at the problem, training, information exchange, the development of a network involving some one hundred countries. There had been significant upgrading in forty countries of CIA capabilities in paramilitary training, hostage rescue and VIP protection.

  2. Indian History. To what extent did large dams built before 1990 fulfil Nehru's ambitions?

    Irrigation was Nehru's principal economic objective of large dam building. It must be explored in terms of increasing food production to improve India's 'huge agrarian economy that was one of the most impoverished in the world' (Khilnani, 2004, p. 64).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work