• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the Conflict perspective on US history challenge the concept of American Exceptionalism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does the Conflict perspective on US history challenge the concept of American Exceptionalism? The USA is perhaps the only country in the world where by its own admission, citizenship is a state of mind. To explain this it is necessary to compare it to my own British citizenship. One of my grandfathers' hails from Northern Ireland, the other from Wales. The fact that I was born in England and my relatives are from other UK countries makes us all British. In the case of the US, being an American is not due to ethnic origin or place of birth, but a belief to a set of ideals and a constitution. In this sense it is possible for any American to stop being an American by not holding true to these ideals and the US itself. This is the basis for the concept of American Exceptionalism. It is also not difficult to see the economic, political and cultural factors which may be used in the argument for American Exceptionalism. Many Americans see the good fortune of their own country as putting it in the position of having a 'unique mission in the world'1. ...read more.

Middle

The other school of thinking is that of consensus theory, where history progresses through peaceful continuity; and politics are always consensual. It is now necessary to apply these perspectives to American history, see which is prevalent and if a synthesis between the two can be created, and then assess whether or not the idea of American Exceptionalism is viable given the contradiction of the conflict perspective. The key difficulty in using the conflict and consensus perspectives is that they can not be picked or chosen. The US historian Hartz undertook a study on US society. He found that the study "does not permit us to choose between "conflict" or "consensus"...American history contains both of these elements in the proportions which make it, in relation to other national histories, explicable"3 The first thing to be looked at is groups of people in the USA. Affiliations or member groups in the USA are interest groups. These fall into the conflict perspective as interest groups protect consumer rights and empower members. This does not challenge exceptionalism however as it demonstrates Americas pluralistic society in action, definitely a factor of American exceptionalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

American political traditions must be looked at using a synthesis of the two perspectives. Although there is clear conflict in politics, there is also a deeper consensus of opinion. Even though a synthesis of the two must be used, this definitely challenges American exceptionalism as all western liberal democracies are similar. In looking at the USA, it is clear to see that there are two different types of synthesis to be compiled from the conflict/consensus perspectives. The first is drawn from dealing with social structure and political groups. There may be visible conflict all the time but there is a deeper underlying consensus. This means that the ends are agreed upon but not the means, a superficial conflict. After looking at affiliated groups, history and the nature of change in the US I believe that it is more the other way around, that there has been an underlying conflict in US history, which is given the appearance of consensus due to compromise. This does challenge American exceptionalism, although not to the extent I originally believed. American politics, history and the bloody nature of change offer nothing to call different or exceptional in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    Gamal Abdul Nasser signed an arms deal with Czechoslovakia in 1955, Israel and the West became anxious that Nasser was allowing the USSR a grip in the Middle East. In fact Nasser had only made this arms agreement to gain fighter planes, bombers, guns and tanks and other weapons from the USSR.

  2. Introduction to American drama.

    In the depression years of the 1930s, he aligned himself with radical politics because he felt the economic system was failing millions of ordinary citizens. His origins and his experience of the Depression were very important influences in shaping his writing.

  1. Examine the main premises behind Eisenhower's concept of containment

    The threat of tactical nuclear bombing was the US's bargaining chip in bringing about negotiating talks over Korea, at peace talks in India and at truce negotiations at Panmunjom, Ike later recalled "we dropped the word discreetly, of our intention.

  2. American History.

    Bacon's Rebellion - why did it occur? - Around the same time, Virginians also experienced conflict w/the Indians b/c of land, although the conflict played out slightly differently. After land-hungry Virginians attacked two Indians tribes, Indians raided outlying farms in retaliation in the winter of 1676.

  1. Indian History. To what extent did large dams built before 1990 fulfil Nehru's ambitions?

    While the availability of good quality seeds, of high-yielding crops and of fertilizer, as provided by the Green Revolution, are all important, the 'average increase in crop production, due to irrigation ... is a phenomenal 183 percent' (Singh, 1997, p.

  2. A New America: History of America's Escape from England

    Most Americans shared his enthusiasm for the French Revolution until it took a turn unlike anything the American Revolution brought, with escalating popular violence, the execution of King Louis XVI (1793), and the establishment not of regular constitutional government but the arbitrary violence of Maximilien Robespierre and the Terror.

  1. Arab-Israeli Conflict 1948-1996.

    The Camp David negotiations took place over 12 days, beginning on the 5th September, 1978. Camp David was overlooked by US President Jimmy Carter and by the end of the accords, two agreements between Sadat and Israel leader Begin had been signed, healing the conflict between Egypt and Israel.

  2. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    Another government branch was the Okrana, the secret police, who arrested people suspected of plotting against the Tsar. Those arrested were often condemned without trial, and many were executed, imprisoned, or exiled to Siberia, the harshest land in all of Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work