'To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, rather than built socialism.'

Authors Avatar

‘To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, rather than built socialism.’

Lenin’s arrival to power in 1917 was supposed to mark the beginning of Socialism in Russia. However, as the title of the essay indicates, Lenin’s aims didn’t go according to plans. This essay will look at the reasons why and will also analyse whether Lenin was able to build a prosperous Socialist country, or whether he just clung on to power without establishing Socialism.

To begin this essay it is probably best to define what was meant by and involved in Socialism. Socialist ideology taught that everybody was equal no matter what race, gender, age etc. Socialism would see an end to the class system as well as bringing an end to the gap in wealth between the rich and the poor. Wealth and goods would be produced by industry and would be shared out equally. It was in everyone’s interest to work together for the good of the state.

A disastrous mixture of economic, social and diplomatic conditions forced the Bolsheviks to change direction in 1921. At the end of the Civil War, the economic conditions in Russia were unimaginable. ‘By 1921, the output of large-scale industry stood at just 14% of its 1913 levels. Much of the fabric of commercial agriculture had been torn apart by the upheaval of war and revolution. (Gatrell sheet pg.1)’ The social climate was no less distressing. The bitter conflict between the Red and Whites armies brought social changes. Despite the Bolsheviks’ success in the war, their popularity shrunk disturbingly. In large-scale industries the workforce had shrunk by almost 60% by the end of 1920 compared to 1917 levels. Most workers were called up to fight for the Red army or into administrative positions within the party. Others were forced to flee the towns in order to search for food, which had been in short supply. Workers seemed to suffer most from the Civil War and began to vent their frustrations, with three in four factories on strike in 1920. With the Bolsheviks supposedly representing the peasants, things didn’t seem to be going according to plan. With the peasants arguably suffering the most and with still a gap between classes, Socialism was still a long way off.

Join now!

              The Bolsheviks’ problems were further exasperated when the Kronstadt sailors raised the flag of rebellion in March 1921. These sailors were the same people who established the power of the Soviet in 1917 and who seemed to be loyal supporters of the Bolsheviks. However, many of the sailors were ex-peasants who had connections with the countryside and supported the peasant’s revolt. They also knew that the Bolshevik propaganda about the strikers was a pack of lies. The Kronstadt sailors demanded multi-party democracy and civil rights. This came as a major blow to the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay