• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, rather than built socialism.'

Extracts from this document...


'To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, rather than built socialism.' Lenin's arrival to power in 1917 was supposed to mark the beginning of Socialism in Russia. However, as the title of the essay indicates, Lenin's aims didn't go according to plans. This essay will look at the reasons why and will also analyse whether Lenin was able to build a prosperous Socialist country, or whether he just clung on to power without establishing Socialism. To begin this essay it is probably best to define what was meant by and involved in Socialism. Socialist ideology taught that everybody was equal no matter what race, gender, age etc. Socialism would see an end to the class system as well as bringing an end to the gap in wealth between the rich and the poor. Wealth and goods would be produced by industry and would be shared out equally. It was in everyone's interest to work together for the good of the state. A disastrous mixture of economic, social and diplomatic conditions forced the Bolsheviks to change direction in 1921. At the end of the Civil War, the economic conditions in Russia were unimaginable. ...read more.


However, they could see no sign of conditions improving for peasants and the working class and no sign of a future Socialist nation. Divisions began to appear in the Bolshevik's reign. Kollantai and Shlyapkinov helped build a group called the Workers' Opposition. They wanted workers to be given more control of their own affairs and supported complaints about the reintroduction of single managers and the militaristic organisation of the workplace. They also heavily criticised Trotsky for his plans to make trade unions agencies of the state as well as the state appointing union officials. This debate caused furious arguments within the party by the end of 1920. The party's leadership position seemed very precarious at this point and it became obvious that not everyone shared the same view on Socialism within the party. In order to keep power Lenin realised that concessions to the peasants and some form of economic liberalisation had to be implemented. In order to regain lost support from the peasants and others such as the Kronstadt sailors, Lenin realised that War Communism had to be ended in order for this to happen, despite some stern opposition within the party. ...read more.


Lenin, however, did centralise the state between 1918 and 1924. This was an important aspect of Socialism and showed that the Bolsheviks were in a strong enough position to decide on how things should be run. It also showed that the Bolsheviks had a firm hold over Russia. Between 1918 and 1919, during the Civil War, Lenin was able to nationalise industries and brought them under the control of the Supreme Economic Council. Workers too were desperate for the nationalisation of industries so that factories were kept going and so therefore workers kept their jobs. The nationalisation of industries was a key feature in Socialist ideology. The Bolshevik party didn't want any private firms in Russia. Privatisation and profit making was seen as a Capitalist trademark, which the Bolsheviks detested. By the autumn of 1919, 80 per cent of all enterprises were part of a centrally directed economy. The rail system was another key aspect of Lenin's centralisation plans. Railways were vital for the war effort as it maintained food supplies to the major cities. However, the rail system was collapsing and Mensheviks who could not be trusted dominated the railway union. The Bolsheviks therefore decided that it needed to come under their control in order for the situation to improve. So, the railway system too become nationalised. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    his instructions and waiting for a multi-party and semi-constitutional revolution by the Congress of Soviets.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * He wanted to build himself up to be all-powerful and stop anyone opposing his ideas. This became known as the 'Cult of Personality'. Stalin made out that he was a superman who never made any mistakes. What was the Cult of Personality?

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    The ideas of Lenin and Stalin were also similar in many ways. Lenin seems to have influenced the way Stalin approached ideas, as their views on issues such as agriculture and industrialisation are similar. Both men wanted to raise Russia's economic status by implementing changes in both these areas.

  2. Why did 1917 end with Lenin in Power rather than Kerensky?

    Further problems occurred in the fact that the Government was consistently undermined by the Soviets. The socialists, although obviously restrained by Marxist doctrine, were limiting Kerensky's powers, allowing only law/decisions that would not be to the detriment of socialist revolutionaries and would not contradict the Marxist doctrine.

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    For example at the battle of Omdurman in 1898 11,000 Sudanese were killed compared to only 28 British. However machine guns were only used in colonial warfare by the British as many officers refused to use such technology in European warfare: '[refused to] harness and control their killing power'3 When

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    They emphasize the less direct role of Hitler, labelling him as somewhat of an opportunist. They stress that the cumulative radicalism of the racial policy, due to the rivalry within the unstable Nazi power structure, and Hitler?s unwillingness to create an ordered systematic government provided the major driving force behind the Holocaust.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Many peasants felt betrayed and hostile towards the regime. As a result, some welcomed the German invasion in 1941, hoping for liberation from the collectives. 4. Agriculture sacrifices to satisfy the needs of industry and socialist ideology. 1. More and more peasants became literate ï some collective farms included schools, to better the education system in the USSR.

  2. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    this point Russia had lost its influence and political power in Finland which had become fully independent. Russia still controlled at this point the Baltic?s states (which it would later lose power in) Ukraine was another area Lenin controlled, but there were independence movements gaining prominence in Ukraine at this time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work