• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, rather than built socialism.'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'To what extent had Lenin merely held on to power in Russia between 1917-1924, rather than built socialism.' Lenin's arrival to power in 1917 was supposed to mark the beginning of Socialism in Russia. However, as the title of the essay indicates, Lenin's aims didn't go according to plans. This essay will look at the reasons why and will also analyse whether Lenin was able to build a prosperous Socialist country, or whether he just clung on to power without establishing Socialism. To begin this essay it is probably best to define what was meant by and involved in Socialism. Socialist ideology taught that everybody was equal no matter what race, gender, age etc. Socialism would see an end to the class system as well as bringing an end to the gap in wealth between the rich and the poor. Wealth and goods would be produced by industry and would be shared out equally. It was in everyone's interest to work together for the good of the state. A disastrous mixture of economic, social and diplomatic conditions forced the Bolsheviks to change direction in 1921. At the end of the Civil War, the economic conditions in Russia were unimaginable. ...read more.

Middle

However, they could see no sign of conditions improving for peasants and the working class and no sign of a future Socialist nation. Divisions began to appear in the Bolshevik's reign. Kollantai and Shlyapkinov helped build a group called the Workers' Opposition. They wanted workers to be given more control of their own affairs and supported complaints about the reintroduction of single managers and the militaristic organisation of the workplace. They also heavily criticised Trotsky for his plans to make trade unions agencies of the state as well as the state appointing union officials. This debate caused furious arguments within the party by the end of 1920. The party's leadership position seemed very precarious at this point and it became obvious that not everyone shared the same view on Socialism within the party. In order to keep power Lenin realised that concessions to the peasants and some form of economic liberalisation had to be implemented. In order to regain lost support from the peasants and others such as the Kronstadt sailors, Lenin realised that War Communism had to be ended in order for this to happen, despite some stern opposition within the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin, however, did centralise the state between 1918 and 1924. This was an important aspect of Socialism and showed that the Bolsheviks were in a strong enough position to decide on how things should be run. It also showed that the Bolsheviks had a firm hold over Russia. Between 1918 and 1919, during the Civil War, Lenin was able to nationalise industries and brought them under the control of the Supreme Economic Council. Workers too were desperate for the nationalisation of industries so that factories were kept going and so therefore workers kept their jobs. The nationalisation of industries was a key feature in Socialist ideology. The Bolshevik party didn't want any private firms in Russia. Privatisation and profit making was seen as a Capitalist trademark, which the Bolsheviks detested. By the autumn of 1919, 80 per cent of all enterprises were part of a centrally directed economy. The rail system was another key aspect of Lenin's centralisation plans. Railways were vital for the war effort as it maintained food supplies to the major cities. However, the rail system was collapsing and Mensheviks who could not be trusted dominated the railway union. The Bolsheviks therefore decided that it needed to come under their control in order for the situation to improve. So, the railway system too become nationalised. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    What was the Cult of Personality? * Stalin created the impression that he was a genius at everything. He was described as the 'wisest man of the twentieth century', the 'genius of the age'. The Soviet people were told that he was never wrong. This protected Stalin from any further challenges.

  2. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    encouraged by Stalin - leading him to be 'worshipped' like a god. This made Lenin a role model for the people of Russia as he was seen as great in influential places such as schools. A religious approach to Lenin is also shown with the fact that there were pilgrimages

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Lenin argued forcefully and effectively for insurrection, pursuing relentlessly the line he had argued in his letters from Finland. Now is the time, he declared, for insurrection. If we do not strike now our chance will be lost, perhaps forever.

  2. To what extent had the NEP achieved its objectives by 1924?

    some factories stayed open due to nationalisation, which ensured jobs, overall it left Russia in an awful state. There were food shortages, people always queuing up for food, fuel etc, corruption of some of the Bolsheviks members; an increase in prostitutes a big wave of emigration.

  1. How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924?

    Before the November Revolution though, there was the Bourgeois revolution in March 1917 which led to the abdication of the Tsar, and the Provisional Government taking over the running of the country until elections could be held. The people in Russia were not happy with the outcome of this revolution

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    of Hitler?s mind and are well researched, yet it must be noted that as a Jew whose family and friends were directly affected by the holocaust, there is the possible question of significant bias and exaggeration. In this source Dawidowicz focuses, like many other Internationalist?s, on the numerous anti-Semitic statements

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The left side (Stalin) thought this was too slow and dangerous ï rapid collectivisation would force the peasants to fall in line. By following such a ruthless policy, Stalin would also be removing his last political rivals, such as Bukharin, and securing his position as leader of the USSR.

  2. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    this point Russia had lost its influence and political power in Finland which had become fully independent. Russia still controlled at this point the Baltic?s states (which it would later lose power in) Ukraine was another area Lenin controlled, but there were independence movements gaining prominence in Ukraine at this time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work