• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems?

Extracts from this document...


James Collinson L6 12 To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems? James I was the first Stuart king of England. He came to England with no experience of running a country as big as England. He had not been brought up so he would be ready to rule a country like England. It could be said he would have very little idea about the finances of a country as large as England. When James came to the English throne he had a debt of just �2000 however in 1606 just 3 years after his accession he had amassed a debt of �700,000. Whichever way James is looked at, the conclusion can be drawn that he was extravagant with money and took a no expense spared policy on state occasions. For example he spent �20,000 on his coronation. This was the first problem for James. He came to power in 1603 following Elizabeth's death. As a result of this he had to organize her funeral, which would have cost any monarch a lot of money (but not as much as he spent on it). In the end this cost him �17,000. He then had to organize his coronation. James was in no mood to make this a cheap occasion. ...read more.


His family was much bigger than Elizabeth's (she had no children or husband). He had three children - Henry, Charles and Elizabeth and also a wife. He, his wife and heir to the throne, Henry, all had to have a court. This was at great expense to him. What made it worse was that Henry was more demanding than James himself. He therefore wanted a court of the highest caliber. Elizabeth needed to be married off to a man. Money would be paid to the man to thank him for taking the lady. James spent �90,000 altogether on Elizabeth's wedding. This included the actual ceremony and the money paid to her husband, Frederick of the Palatinate. The queen had to have a court so that she could entertain all her friends and set up marriages between nobles and ladies. It was not James' fault for having a family but if he had been less extravagant on their wardrobes and their general expenses this could have been controlled. However the very nobles the queen was entertaining were ripping off the king. They were under assessing the crown lands and therefore they could keep more of the money for themselves. For example one noble said that in 1560 in Elizabeth's reign there lands were worth �48 and then in 1626 they were worth just �12. ...read more.


He also became the mediator of Europe. This was because he was part catholic (through his mother) and part protestant (the way he was brought up). The wars James fought were not numerous and the most major was in Ireland. As a result this cannot really be thought of as a financial problem but more as a burden than he must always be ready for a war with Sapin i.e. have money available. This should have become less of a problem towards the end of his reign as he had a catholic daughter-in-law and a protestant son-in-law but it did not and at the conclusion of his reign he was a war with Span yet again. James did his best to stop his financing getting in to a bad situation by employing Lord Treasurers and stopping wars, but in conclusion has to b said James was simply too extravagant for the English throne at this time. It did not help that he did not have the best relationship with parliament (although better than his son - Charles I) and therefore they were unwilling to bail him out when he was in financial trouble. The general problem with inflation did not help James as well but a good monarch would have learnt to deal with this in the best way possible something that James did not seem capable of doing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

While the answer is certainly along the right lines, it needs much more detail and supporting evidence. Moreover, the answer needs to be further stretched from an analytical perspective. It needs to be more rigorous in its assessment and allow factors to lead the content of each paragraph. As no dates are provided in the question, the student needs to offer a broad overview with carefully selected specifics which are well supported with evidence as suggested above.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 08/01/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    the classical organisation as a way of changing the nature of the Elizabethan church from within... they planned to take over eventual control of the official church'. This shows that in theory the 'classes' represented a serious threat to the entire structure of the Church, but in practice not much

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successfully did Elizabeth I handle her finances?

    3 star(s)

    An important method that Elizabeth used was monopolies. Monopolies were seen as a cheap form of patronage and Elizabeth used them too often, especially towards the end of her reign.

  1. To What Extent Were the Polices and Attitude of Charles X The Main Reason ...

    The nation as a whole was lethargic of political matters and therefore would have put up little protest to Charles X's ordinances as long as they did not affect their standard of living. The only area in which the people were incensed and organised enough to challenge Charles X's ordinances with any hope of success was Paris.

  2. how significant was the catholic threat to elizabeth 1, posed by her roman catholic ...

    collectively as Catholics, the threat they posed was significant mainly due to their secrecy, extreme views and willingness to die for their faith. From 1570 onwards Elizabeth and her government were becoming increasingly intolerant of Catholics and increasingly aware of the threat they posed to Elizabeth's reign.

  1. "William Wilberforce was primarily responsible for the abolition of the Slave Trade in the ...

    had no evidence, knowledge or tactical expertise and therefore would never had been passed at all. Furthermore Wilberforce became very concerned with spreading the message of Anglicanism, after his conversion consequently distracting him from his abolition goals and proving that in reality, his priorities lay elsewhere.

  2. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    This support caused the government to be increasingly unpopular but he had too support them otherwise law and order would fall down. Lord Liverpool not only used spies, magistrates and soldiers he used legislation. The first act that he passed was the suspension of Habeas Corpus.

  1. How consistent was British policy towards Ireland from 1798-1921?

    The sceptical stance adopted at the start of the period - keeping Ireland as close to Britain as possible for fear of letting go of the 'Achilles heel' to France was reversed quite spectacularly with the granting of Dominion Status to Ireland in 1921.

  2. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    It became even more so when he then imposed the ship tax onto all towns and villages, even if they were inland. He argued that all of the country benefited from the Navy's protection so they should pay taxes to help in its upkeep.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work