• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems?

Extracts from this document...


James Collinson L6 12 To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems? James I was the first Stuart king of England. He came to England with no experience of running a country as big as England. He had not been brought up so he would be ready to rule a country like England. It could be said he would have very little idea about the finances of a country as large as England. When James came to the English throne he had a debt of just �2000 however in 1606 just 3 years after his accession he had amassed a debt of �700,000. Whichever way James is looked at, the conclusion can be drawn that he was extravagant with money and took a no expense spared policy on state occasions. For example he spent �20,000 on his coronation. This was the first problem for James. He came to power in 1603 following Elizabeth's death. As a result of this he had to organize her funeral, which would have cost any monarch a lot of money (but not as much as he spent on it). In the end this cost him �17,000. He then had to organize his coronation. James was in no mood to make this a cheap occasion. ...read more.


His family was much bigger than Elizabeth's (she had no children or husband). He had three children - Henry, Charles and Elizabeth and also a wife. He, his wife and heir to the throne, Henry, all had to have a court. This was at great expense to him. What made it worse was that Henry was more demanding than James himself. He therefore wanted a court of the highest caliber. Elizabeth needed to be married off to a man. Money would be paid to the man to thank him for taking the lady. James spent �90,000 altogether on Elizabeth's wedding. This included the actual ceremony and the money paid to her husband, Frederick of the Palatinate. The queen had to have a court so that she could entertain all her friends and set up marriages between nobles and ladies. It was not James' fault for having a family but if he had been less extravagant on their wardrobes and their general expenses this could have been controlled. However the very nobles the queen was entertaining were ripping off the king. They were under assessing the crown lands and therefore they could keep more of the money for themselves. For example one noble said that in 1560 in Elizabeth's reign there lands were worth �48 and then in 1626 they were worth just �12. ...read more.


He also became the mediator of Europe. This was because he was part catholic (through his mother) and part protestant (the way he was brought up). The wars James fought were not numerous and the most major was in Ireland. As a result this cannot really be thought of as a financial problem but more as a burden than he must always be ready for a war with Sapin i.e. have money available. This should have become less of a problem towards the end of his reign as he had a catholic daughter-in-law and a protestant son-in-law but it did not and at the conclusion of his reign he was a war with Span yet again. James did his best to stop his financing getting in to a bad situation by employing Lord Treasurers and stopping wars, but in conclusion has to b said James was simply too extravagant for the English throne at this time. It did not help that he did not have the best relationship with parliament (although better than his son - Charles I) and therefore they were unwilling to bail him out when he was in financial trouble. The general problem with inflation did not help James as well but a good monarch would have learnt to deal with this in the best way possible something that James did not seem capable of doing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

While the answer is certainly along the right lines, it needs much more detail and supporting evidence. Moreover, the answer needs to be further stretched from an analytical perspective. It needs to be more rigorous in its assessment and allow factors to lead the content of each paragraph. As no dates are provided in the question, the student needs to offer a broad overview with carefully selected specifics which are well supported with evidence as suggested above.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 08/01/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    Another problem may be that the French king was a devout Catholic; therefore it would have been practically impossible for Elizabeth to lead a Protestant country without offending her new husband - consequently the country's religion would have to be Catholicism, deeply displeasing her protestant citizens.

  2. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    This is a form of centralisation, with all laws and directives coming from the king's council. To do this he must have had a very effective and well-managed government otherwise running a kingdom from the extreme centre would have been impossible.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    The particular significance of the way the Tudors again extended royal authority to new heights lay in the fact that after them it never had to be done again. The Crown thereafter was involved in different struggles and problems. It never again had to tight for powers with the great barons of the realm.

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    However, in 1604, initial suggestions of tolerations for Catholics were put a side during parliamentary disputes. With James' hopes of a united Britain, MP's discriminated the Scottish, James promised that he would start enforcing penal and recusancy laws against the Catholics due to his need for a subsidy and his hope for a united England and Scotland.

  1. How far were James I's financial problems in England up to 1618 Of his ...

    Between 1603 and 1612 he spent �185,000 on jewels, and expenditure on clothes for James and his royal servants went from �10,000 to �36,000. James also found it difficult to say 'no' and enjoyed being his generous to favourites. This was best demonstrated when in 1607, a time when royal

  2. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    Queen Caroline returned from Britain to claim her right as queen but matters became complicated when Caroline died in 1821. The authorities intended that her coffin be taken through the back streets of London and taken home to Italy by sea.

  1. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    revolution and if anything strengthened him in his quest to preserve the monarchy. Pitt was also winning a war in propaganda, where he made Jacobites (anti monarchy, pro-reform believers) seem like horrible, scandalous people which helped turn the British public against them and made the monarchy seem as something good, something that should be desired.

  2. What was the impact of the Poor Law Amendment Act on the relief of ...

    be easily found and the second was to protect urban ratepayers from the demands of migrant workers before obtaining regular employment. The less eligibility principle drove potential paupers to find work rather than entering the workhouse and settlement laws prevented people claiming relief other than in their own parish.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work