• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems?

Extracts from this document...


James Collinson L6 12 To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems? James I was the first Stuart king of England. He came to England with no experience of running a country as big as England. He had not been brought up so he would be ready to rule a country like England. It could be said he would have very little idea about the finances of a country as large as England. When James came to the English throne he had a debt of just �2000 however in 1606 just 3 years after his accession he had amassed a debt of �700,000. Whichever way James is looked at, the conclusion can be drawn that he was extravagant with money and took a no expense spared policy on state occasions. For example he spent �20,000 on his coronation. This was the first problem for James. He came to power in 1603 following Elizabeth's death. As a result of this he had to organize her funeral, which would have cost any monarch a lot of money (but not as much as he spent on it). In the end this cost him �17,000. He then had to organize his coronation. James was in no mood to make this a cheap occasion. ...read more.


His family was much bigger than Elizabeth's (she had no children or husband). He had three children - Henry, Charles and Elizabeth and also a wife. He, his wife and heir to the throne, Henry, all had to have a court. This was at great expense to him. What made it worse was that Henry was more demanding than James himself. He therefore wanted a court of the highest caliber. Elizabeth needed to be married off to a man. Money would be paid to the man to thank him for taking the lady. James spent �90,000 altogether on Elizabeth's wedding. This included the actual ceremony and the money paid to her husband, Frederick of the Palatinate. The queen had to have a court so that she could entertain all her friends and set up marriages between nobles and ladies. It was not James' fault for having a family but if he had been less extravagant on their wardrobes and their general expenses this could have been controlled. However the very nobles the queen was entertaining were ripping off the king. They were under assessing the crown lands and therefore they could keep more of the money for themselves. For example one noble said that in 1560 in Elizabeth's reign there lands were worth �48 and then in 1626 they were worth just �12. ...read more.


He also became the mediator of Europe. This was because he was part catholic (through his mother) and part protestant (the way he was brought up). The wars James fought were not numerous and the most major was in Ireland. As a result this cannot really be thought of as a financial problem but more as a burden than he must always be ready for a war with Sapin i.e. have money available. This should have become less of a problem towards the end of his reign as he had a catholic daughter-in-law and a protestant son-in-law but it did not and at the conclusion of his reign he was a war with Span yet again. James did his best to stop his financing getting in to a bad situation by employing Lord Treasurers and stopping wars, but in conclusion has to b said James was simply too extravagant for the English throne at this time. It did not help that he did not have the best relationship with parliament (although better than his son - Charles I) and therefore they were unwilling to bail him out when he was in financial trouble. The general problem with inflation did not help James as well but a good monarch would have learnt to deal with this in the best way possible something that James did not seem capable of doing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

While the answer is certainly along the right lines, it needs much more detail and supporting evidence. Moreover, the answer needs to be further stretched from an analytical perspective. It needs to be more rigorous in its assessment and allow factors to lead the content of each paragraph. As no dates are provided in the question, the student needs to offer a broad overview with carefully selected specifics which are well supported with evidence as suggested above.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 08/01/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    the classical organisation as a way of changing the nature of the Elizabethan church from within... they planned to take over eventual control of the official church'. This shows that in theory the 'classes' represented a serious threat to the entire structure of the Church, but in practice not much

  2. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    Another problem may be that the French king was a devout Catholic; therefore it would have been practically impossible for Elizabeth to lead a Protestant country without offending her new husband - consequently the country's religion would have to be Catholicism, deeply displeasing her protestant citizens.

  1. how significant was the catholic threat to elizabeth 1, posed by her roman catholic ...

    religious issue into a political one, so more could be done to punish the rebels. By 1581 it became treason to try to convert anyone to Catholicism and there were fines imposed on those hearing or saying mass. Throughout the 1580's the government brought in many new acts, such as

  2. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    He therefore devised the Free Gift, which relied on people being overcome with patriotism and donating the money for the security of the country. People were very suspicious of it because it did not have parliamentary approval and also, as part of it, a list would be kept of all those who did not pay.

  1. Henry VII achieved the aims of his foreign policy. Comment

    Things changed towards the end of Henry's rule however with the pardoning of the Earl of Kildare in 1496 and power was returned to him.

  2. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    to be less likely, as for revolution to happen most of the population have to have a genuine desire to overthrow a hated regime. By winning a propaganda war, Pitt prevented this and ensured he had strong support throughout the country, which was good for him as it reduced the chances of revolution.

  1. To what extent was Anglo Saxon England transformed by the Norman Conquest?

    Feudalism was introduced in England in 1066 following the Battle of Hastings and the Norman Conquest. Feudalism was based on the exchange of land for military service. William the Conqueror claimed all the land in England and divide the land between himself from which he gained around about 20% and

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    The restoration and improvement of the Royal Navy also increased support as people felt he had restored something that gave Britain pride and strength. All of these helped Pitt secure the vote of many more people and cemented his domination, and show everyone how he was better than his opposition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work