• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Mary, Queen of Scots the major cause of instability in Elizabethan England?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Mary, Queen of Scots the major cause of instability in Elizabethan England? During Elizabeth's reign, minor incidences occurred which could have caused instability if they had escalated including; Mary, Queen of Scots and the succession issue, plots in England, plots abroad and the puritans. Historian Heather Thomas stated, "Mary was always seen as a considerable threat to Elizabeth. Many Catholics did not recognize Elizabeth as the true Queen of the realm."1 This is shown to be incorrect with the lack of support for the Northern Earls Rebellion, the long lasting respect shown to Elizabeth by Pope Pius V and Phillip II and Puritan loyalty to the Queen despite grievances with her religious settlement. Furthermore, Mary could cause no instability after 1587 and her son James was a popular choice for Elizabeth's heir. Plots in England such as the Northern Earls Rebellion and the Ridolfi Plot were carelessly organised, closely watched by Walsingham and Elizabeth's spy network and therefore never came to fruition. The excommunication had little impact throughout Europe; it was not publicised, banned from display in Spain and as the majority of English Catholics resided in the north, they were in no position to cause Elizabeth any instability. The Spanish Armada came closest to causing instability in England, but weather and geographical conditions ensured its failure and so no instability arose. All puritans were loyal to Elizabeth as Queen, if not as head of the Church and they were too disunited and unorganised to ever become a cause of instability. Any instability during Elizabeth's reign was certainly contributed to by Elizabeth herself: she heightened tension concerning the succession by refusing to either marry or name an heir and being indecisive over Mary's execution. ...read more.

Middle

The plot caused no instability as it was discovered early, Norfolk was executed and Mary's freedom of movement reduced. Mary was responsible for her own involvement in plots against Elizabeth's life, and she was actively plotting against her cousin in an attempt to assume the throne. However, although Elizabeth took measures in the form of Walsingham and his spy network, she could have ended plots involving Mary if she had executed her after the first attempt at treason, and so secured her throne; therefore Elizabeth was also responsible for the possibility of instability. But plots did not destabilise the Queen because none were successful and Elizabeth was never close to being overthrown. Therefore the plots involving Mary were not a cause of instability. In addition to threats at home; various foreign Catholic powers such as; Pope Pius V, when he issued the Regnans in Excelsis; the launch of the Spanish Armada by Phillip II and the Huguenots betrayal of Elizabeth could have caused instability within England because they brought the risk of invasion and the possibility of English Catholics betraying her to foreign powers. In actuality Elizabeth never came close to losing her throne, and countered threats made against her. Mary held no active role in foreign plots and was not central to them. Positive relations with France were necessary, particularly before Mary's execution because; Mary was related to the Guise family, who aimed to re-establish Catholicism and Mary, in Scotland. If Scotland renewed the 'auld alliance', it could become a stepping-stone through which Catholic forces could invade and threaten Elizabeth. During the French civil war, the Huguenots united with the Guises and turned on her, which could have caused instability. ...read more.

Conclusion

As a monarch she was independent of the Pope, which gave her more authority and powers of patronage not available to other monarchs. Lack of unity within puritan factions and Elizabeth's decisive action meant that the puritans never successfully challenged stability. Although situations that had the possibility of causing instability arose during Elizabeth's reign, none of the threats against her materialised. There was no issue over the succession because Mary was executed in 1587 after which James became the natural successor; he was male, Protestant, and an experienced ruler. It was assumed he would take the throne so Elizabeth did not need to name him. Every plot in England was monitored by Cecil and Walsingham and none came to fruition even when Mary gave her full support; the Northern Earls Rebellion had 6000 supporters and still caused no instability because it was poorly motivated and badly organised. The excommunication had no impact on Elizabeth; it was badly publicised, ignored by Phillip II (the main Catholic power in Europe) there was no religious crusade and the majority of English Catholics lived in the north where they were less danger to stability. The Spanish Armada came the closest to panicking Elizabeth, but it failed, there was no invasion and Elizabeth never came close to losing her throne. The Puritans were too disunited to be effective and all accepted Elizabeth as ruler if not as Supreme Governor and so they caused no instability. In reality, Mary Queen of Scots was not the major cause of instability in Elizabethan England because Elizabeth's regime was stable throughout; despite threats she never had to increase her security or came close to losing her throne. She was popular with the people free from intimidating plots and ruled securely throughout her reign. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. how significant was the catholic threat to elizabeth 1, posed by her roman catholic ...

    The most extreme branches of Catholicism arrived in England during the 1570's these were trained priests set up by Philip II in Flanders. The seminary priests, as they were known, were taught to work in England to bring people's souls back to salvation through Catholicism.

  2. To what extent was Mary I successful in her attempt to re-impose Catholicism in ...

    and thirdly, the regime wasn't revengeful towards the Protestants, especially in its first few years. Mary took the throne in July 1553 an in October of the same year, Parliament passes a Statute of Repeal, which repealed the Act of Uniformity of the previous year and stated that all administration

  1. coursework on Elizabeth I

    However, if Mary had never entered England, Elizabeth would have not had to deal with her at all and this single action of Mary's caused many Catholic's to become rebellious and this may have been the final element that caused Elizabeth to reach the decision to have Mary moved from

  2. Witchcraft in the Elizabethan era.

    Catholics repeated Sander's claims, and many in provincial areas believed them because they had never seen Queen Anne. There is no truth in the claim that Anne had a sixth finger, this extra digit was the reputed characteristic of a witch.

  1. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    This pressure was cashed out in the form of license revoking through the power of convocation, unless the minister fully subscribed to the entire 39 articles, prayer book and surplice before the Ecclesiastical commissioners. It seems like all Puritan challenges in parliament henceforth, from 1570 to 1593, caused a virulent government backlash.

  2. How influential was Dudley on the reign of Elizabeth 1st

    There were two factions created from the rivalry, one centred on Dudley and one on Cecil, but with the Queen as the undeniably dominating factor. Dudley's influence upon Queen Elizabeth stemmed from her long acquaintance and friendship with him, throughout the years of her confinement and exile as a child.

  1. To what extent had Elizabeth achieved stable relations with foreign powers by 1571? (45)

    Elizabeth supported Hawkins's actions and this infuriated Philip that he blockaded the fleet in the San Juan de Ulua port in Mexico in retaliation, and only two ships were able to escape. This showed the less than stable relations between Spain and England, and both Elizabeth and Philip tried to harass each other.

  2. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    This shows that the issue of faction was more seen as threatening compared to economic and social issue. This proves that economic and social issue were subsidiary cause compared to faction who can be seen as a main cause. Finally, the problems with religion can also be seen as a driving cause for rebellion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work