• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges? The Purges, to the agreement of many, ran from December 1st 1934, the date of Kirov's murder, to 21st August 1940, the date of Trotsky's murder. The entire country was in fear of what could happen to them as all were at risk, either by acquaintances implications or because of the smallest of 'revolutionary' acts. One woman was arrested for saying that Tukachevsky, a high ranking military officer, was handsome after his arrest.1 However, there is no single satisfactory explanation for this terrible epoch in Soviet and even world history. Some historians look to the psyche of Stalin and point to his suspicious distrustful nature as the cause. Others believe that the situation was a logical consequence of Bolshevik theory, whilst some explanations see the Purges as a rational economic decision by Stalin, or a way to remove people as scapegoats for his own economic failures. All of these arguments have their flaws however; seeking an explanation for such an uncontrollable catastrophe is complicated. If Stalin's personality was in fact the main reason for the Purges, this cannot explain the terror alone as the structure of society was partly to blame. By the time Stalin had outsmarted his political rivals in 1928, Stanley Baldwin was Prime Minister in Britain. Baldwin could never have achieved the power that Stalin did however, because he was in a democracy. Any similar attempt to do so would have caused huge objections due to the undermining of the British political system. Alan Wood dismisses the idea that Stalin's terror was a logical consequence of Bolshevik theory as he says 'Lenin was not squeamish but nowhere does he mention or resort to such extreme methods' yet he does concede that Lenin's ...read more.

Middle

with anyone foreign, posing any possible threats to Stalin's power and to know too much about Lenin and his testament that denounced Stalin. Ilya Ehrenburg cannot find any logic linking the victims of the Purge as the strong-minded, independent Pasternak was spared, whilst the obedient Koltsov was liquidated.14 If Stalin did possess an economic motive in relation to who was killed in the Purges then it was not his main reason, he did not begin the Purges because of his economic failings, at least not directly. His initial reason was surely the threat he felt from possible alternatives to his leadership, as the assassination of Kirov shows. He may have felt this threat because of his economic failures however and this indirectly caused the Purges. It seems more likely that once the Purges began; controlling them was like directing a bull to the china shop's exit: it may get there in the end, but at its own pace and direction, wreaking havoc in the meantime. Stalin can be alleviated of the weight of some of his crimes to an extent, because he did not have absolute power over the entire Purges. Although Stalin had set the wheels in motion he would never have assumed that the country would be so thoroughly purged. Chris Ward sees this as predictable; he argues that if the purges grew out of the logic of Bolshevism then the Yezhovschina was bound to grow from the Purges.15 The Yezhovschina was the time in which Yezhov, known as the bloodthirsty dwarf was head of the secret police, the N.K.V.D. It was sometimes believed that Stalin knew nothing of what was going on at the time. It is certainly true that when Yezhov himself was purged and Beria took over his role, the terror eased somewhat. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939'30 Rybakov too saw the Purges as a way for Stalin to avoid any condemnation about his foreign policy, as he says that 'the sole socialist country in the world could survive only if it were unshakably stable'.31 This controversial desire of Stalin's to form an alliance with Germany, does explain why the Army were purged, yet not the rest of the terror. Once again, although Stalin probably did not initiate the Purges for this reason it was a convenient end product. Although it is fairly unlikely that there would have been much disapproval of Stalin's decision, he was the sort of character, who would rather be rid of any chance of confrontation in the future, instead of waiting for it to arrive. The nature of Leninism, did not logically lead to the Purges, but to the situation in which the Purges could happen, if the wrong sort of person became dictator of the Party. Lenin's attitude to the Party, also led to the relative agreement with the Purges that most of the accused felt. The Purges then became almost inevitable as a man of Stalin's nature assumed power, as he distrusted almost everyone and genuinely feared a plot against him. However, once the Purges had begun, the effect was like a rolling snowball, as each person feared for their own lives, they tried to save themselves by denouncing others. Just as Stalin's nature led to the Purges, growing from Bolshevism, Yezhov's nature led to the Yezhovschina growing from the Purges. Stalin did not initiate the Purges because of a desire to make economic scapegoats or unify the country in foreign policy opinion, but whilst the Purge occurred he seized these opportunities. Had it not been for Stalin's paranoia the Purges would never have occurred. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do you agree that Stalins paranoia was the main cause of the ...

    3 star(s)

    Stalin?s paranoia began with him still believing that he had enemies. Stalin was unable to trust his party members which caused his paranoia to increase and when he had been outvoted by Kirov, it caused his paranoia to increase further.

  2. To What Extent was the Idea of 'Lebensraum' the Main War Aim of Hitler's ...

    So in this instance both Lebensraum and Jewish destruction work hand in hand, if the policy of Lebensraum was followed through, then Jewish Bolshevism would almost certainly be wiped out through force alongside the other races living in the occupied nations.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    Tim Chapman argues that 'popular sentiment especially in Germany but also in Spain was anti French rather than pro German or pro Spanish.'16 This suggests that the view can be rejected as the chief complaint of the Congress was acceptable.

  2. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    However, in the far more religious Britain of 1876 this was not so controversial. Religious issues permeated every aspect of life, including law and politics. The attitudes of the day are clearly demonstrated in the Bradlaugh Case, in which confirmed atheist and elected MP for Northampton Charles Bradlaugh was barred

  1. To what extent was Stalin responsible for the modernisation of Russia?

    Alexander III began a policy of Russification where those who were 'disloyal subjects' (mostly those who were not Russian or orthodox but continued to live in Russia. The worst blows fell upon the Jews, with several pogroms took place against the Jews.

  2. How far do you agree that Stalin's paranoia was the main cause of the ...

    to get rid of Kirov away from the Politburo and started to insist that Kirov stay in Leningrad to supervise the local party. Even though there was the events that happened at the Congress of Victors, Stalin had more reason to keep Kirov out of Moscow.

  1. How far do you agree that Stalin's paranoia was the main cause of the ...

    Extensive reports were compiled on the discontent of collectivisation by the OGPU and later the NKVD, clearly worrying Stalin greatly. Finally, Yagoda collected evidence that suggested that many Communist officials questioned the wisdom and motives behind Stalin?s policies, which would only further increase the paranoia that he already felt.

  2. The Great Terror was Primarily Driven by the Insecurities and Paranoia of Stalin himself. ...

    as a necessary last option, Stalin however would use it as the only option. This could have stemmed from his violent father, or the fact he came from Georgia ? known for its brash and forceful culture ? either way, it is un-doubtable that Stalin was not shy to use

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work