• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges? The Purges, to the agreement of many, ran from December 1st 1934, the date of Kirov's murder, to 21st August 1940, the date of Trotsky's murder. The entire country was in fear of what could happen to them as all were at risk, either by acquaintances implications or because of the smallest of 'revolutionary' acts. One woman was arrested for saying that Tukachevsky, a high ranking military officer, was handsome after his arrest.1 However, there is no single satisfactory explanation for this terrible epoch in Soviet and even world history. Some historians look to the psyche of Stalin and point to his suspicious distrustful nature as the cause. Others believe that the situation was a logical consequence of Bolshevik theory, whilst some explanations see the Purges as a rational economic decision by Stalin, or a way to remove people as scapegoats for his own economic failures. All of these arguments have their flaws however; seeking an explanation for such an uncontrollable catastrophe is complicated. If Stalin's personality was in fact the main reason for the Purges, this cannot explain the terror alone as the structure of society was partly to blame. By the time Stalin had outsmarted his political rivals in 1928, Stanley Baldwin was Prime Minister in Britain. Baldwin could never have achieved the power that Stalin did however, because he was in a democracy. Any similar attempt to do so would have caused huge objections due to the undermining of the British political system. Alan Wood dismisses the idea that Stalin's terror was a logical consequence of Bolshevik theory as he says 'Lenin was not squeamish but nowhere does he mention or resort to such extreme methods' yet he does concede that Lenin's ...read more.

Middle

with anyone foreign, posing any possible threats to Stalin's power and to know too much about Lenin and his testament that denounced Stalin. Ilya Ehrenburg cannot find any logic linking the victims of the Purge as the strong-minded, independent Pasternak was spared, whilst the obedient Koltsov was liquidated.14 If Stalin did possess an economic motive in relation to who was killed in the Purges then it was not his main reason, he did not begin the Purges because of his economic failings, at least not directly. His initial reason was surely the threat he felt from possible alternatives to his leadership, as the assassination of Kirov shows. He may have felt this threat because of his economic failures however and this indirectly caused the Purges. It seems more likely that once the Purges began; controlling them was like directing a bull to the china shop's exit: it may get there in the end, but at its own pace and direction, wreaking havoc in the meantime. Stalin can be alleviated of the weight of some of his crimes to an extent, because he did not have absolute power over the entire Purges. Although Stalin had set the wheels in motion he would never have assumed that the country would be so thoroughly purged. Chris Ward sees this as predictable; he argues that if the purges grew out of the logic of Bolshevism then the Yezhovschina was bound to grow from the Purges.15 The Yezhovschina was the time in which Yezhov, known as the bloodthirsty dwarf was head of the secret police, the N.K.V.D. It was sometimes believed that Stalin knew nothing of what was going on at the time. It is certainly true that when Yezhov himself was purged and Beria took over his role, the terror eased somewhat. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939'30 Rybakov too saw the Purges as a way for Stalin to avoid any condemnation about his foreign policy, as he says that 'the sole socialist country in the world could survive only if it were unshakably stable'.31 This controversial desire of Stalin's to form an alliance with Germany, does explain why the Army were purged, yet not the rest of the terror. Once again, although Stalin probably did not initiate the Purges for this reason it was a convenient end product. Although it is fairly unlikely that there would have been much disapproval of Stalin's decision, he was the sort of character, who would rather be rid of any chance of confrontation in the future, instead of waiting for it to arrive. The nature of Leninism, did not logically lead to the Purges, but to the situation in which the Purges could happen, if the wrong sort of person became dictator of the Party. Lenin's attitude to the Party, also led to the relative agreement with the Purges that most of the accused felt. The Purges then became almost inevitable as a man of Stalin's nature assumed power, as he distrusted almost everyone and genuinely feared a plot against him. However, once the Purges had begun, the effect was like a rolling snowball, as each person feared for their own lives, they tried to save themselves by denouncing others. Just as Stalin's nature led to the Purges, growing from Bolshevism, Yezhov's nature led to the Yezhovschina growing from the Purges. Stalin did not initiate the Purges because of a desire to make economic scapegoats or unify the country in foreign policy opinion, but whilst the Purge occurred he seized these opportunities. Had it not been for Stalin's paranoia the Purges would never have occurred. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do you agree that Stalins paranoia was the main cause of the ...

    3 star(s)

    Stalin?s paranoia began with him still believing that he had enemies. Stalin was unable to trust his party members which caused his paranoia to increase and when he had been outvoted by Kirov, it caused his paranoia to increase further.

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    Adam Zamoyski notes that some form of conference would henceforth be held to deal with ever major crisis, indicating a growing sense of solidarity between the powers.25 A second agreement to maintain decent Christian order in Europe, Alexander's Holy Alliance, was also established.

  1. Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

    He would have to pay the soviet price for a while and conquer up to the agreed boundaries in the east; a quick invasion, allowing himself much of the same of what Stalin looked for in the eastern lands (which I will explain later)

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Bullock's first section of his book focuses on Hitler and Stalin separately and discusses their different backgrounds and their individual rise to power. Hitler originally was an artist who found himself thrown into politics because of his unsuccessful career, his dissatisfaction with the Weimar Republic and his hatred towards the Treaty of Versailles.

  1. Why Stalin was able to hold on to power in the Soviet Union: ...

    The Communist party had been purged of anyone likely to face up to Stalin, and all of the old Bolsheviks of the 1917 revolution were gone. History books were rewritten in order to erase any memory of these counter-revolutionaries. By 1939, People's lives were crippled with fear of the NKVD,

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    It can therefore also be argued that Lenin was not a dictator, for example Hill argues, that Lenin's choices to introduce War Communism "...were caused by temporary desperate necessities"16. This suggests that Lenin's actions were not of a dictatorial intention and that Lenin's adaptation of War Communism was a mere response to the harsh economic problems.

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    Stalin also despised the Tsarist government. During Stalin's life he was arrested many times and exiled to Siberia about seven times for his association with the Bolsheviks. Though, he escaped from Siberia each time. By 1912, Stalin had become one of the Bolsheviks top leaders.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    Moreover, the property rights were ensured through the creation of a fixed legal title for those who had purchased confiscated church/crown property ? the biens nationaux. These significant rights of property did benefit the French public and therefore not completely dictatorial.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work