Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World War responsible for his own downfall in February 1917?

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World War responsible for his own downfall in February 1917? In this essay I will discuss the impact of Nicholas' actions on his fate and assess their importance in relation to other factors which led to the fall of the Romanov dynasty. I will argue that whilst the actions of Nicholas himself indeed played a part in his downfall, the major reason for his downfall the was WWI and its effects on the Russian people. The actions of Nicholas were important in causing his downfall. His major mistake was the decision to leave Petrograd in August 1915 and go to the front at Mogilev in order to become Commander-in-chief of the Imperial army. This was a mistake as the Tsar was now personally blamed for the defeats the army suffered instead of his ministers, such as the failure of the Brusilov Offensive, which resulted in one million Russian soldiers being killed. This mistake was compounded by the fact that he left the Tsarina Alexandra in charge of the government. She was unpopular because of her German nationality and was influenced by Rasputin, who had a terrible reputation. This, and her terrible political judgement, tarnished the Tsar's reputation and weakened his popularity. She sacked able ministers and replaced them with her and Rasputin's friends - 35 were sacked between 1915 and 1916.

Middle

There were few field hospitals, as well as a shortage of bandages and medical supplies. Communications were poor, meaning that messages were easily intercepted by their enemies and the coordination of supplies was poor. There was a breakdown in the railway system, with blocked lines and broken down trains - there was a lack of fuel and food, and weapons weren't distributed. These problems were made worse by the low quality of the generals, who had little understanding of modern warfare and the poor leadership shown by the Tsar. As the war progressed the quality of the soldiers began to decrease as most of the officers were killed and replaced by conscripts with little military training, know pejoratively as "peasants in uniform". All of this contributed to low morale amongst the soldiers and a high level of desertion. The Tsar was blamed for these problems and became more unpopular. Like the Russo-Japanese War, WWI put a strain on the economy, meaning that people's quality of life was lowered. This, together with Russia's military defeats under the Tsar began to change people's attitudes towards him in a strongly negative way. In this way the war had a bigger impact on the fall of the Tsar than the actions of the Tsar himself. There is a parallel between the Russo-Japanese War and the 1905 Revolution and WWI and the 1917 Revolution.

Conclusion

These problems culminated in a change in attitude in the capital towards the Tsar which made it possible for Revolution to happen. Although the problems with Alexandra were largely of the Tsar's own making, the economic issues were almost wholly caused by the war, and the fact that the people were freezing and starving was a bigger cause of hostility towards the government than the Tsarina's incompetence. Therefore, I would say that the war played a larger part in the Tsar's downfall than his own actions. The war was the trigger which provided the conditions for the revolution to happen; the workers at the Putilov Steel Works were striking because of working conditions and food shortages; the women who joined the strikes on International Women's Day did so because of bread queues and food shortages. These were economic problems which, although incompetence played a part, were mainly caused by the war. The Tsar's own actions did play a part at the end of the Revolution, when his hesitant personality led to him abdicating without much of a fight. There was also a loss of confidence in his ability to lead among the army, which resulted in the Petrograd garrison refusing to fire on demonstrators and Nicholas being stopped at Pskov by disloyal troops. This was largely the Tsar's own doing. However, the events that led to his abdication would not have happened without the impact of WWI on the Russian economy and people. Gráinne Baker

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Vietnam war

    Impact of the war on civilians in Indochina: Vietnam in General * 1.5 million killed * 3million wounded * 5.8 internal refugees, half the RVN peasantry * 1 million widows, 500,000 orphans * 200,000 RVN prostitutes * 2.2 million hectares of forest destroyed * 500,000 hectares of farmland lost *

  2. To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II able to restore his authority from 1905-1914?

    By dividing the opposition, the threat to the regime was weakened, enabling the Tsar to gradually reassert authority. This is evident in 1906, when the Tsar produces the Fundamental Laws; limiting the powers of the Duma (Article 87) and forcing a complete return to autocracy.

  1. How far was WWI the main cause of the fall of the Romanovs in ...

    This was something that had been proven from previous experiences of the Czar - Witte and Stolypin were the ones who saved the Czar from losing control of the country in 1905. To add to this disillusionment of the people, the impression of the pair that existed even before they

  2. Germany was more responsible than Britain for the naval race before the First World ...

    However the last paragraph of the source reveals that Germany felt responsible to their contribution in building up tension from the naval race. "Our fleet construction there was more tension in our relations with Britain than would have resulted from peaceful competition alone."

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    The Bolsheviks were becoming more and more popular with the people of Russia. At the same time, the Provisional Government was becoming unpopular for continuing Russia's problems. Another major problem in Russia at this time was the land problem. 80% of the Russian population was peasants and they didn't even own the land that they were farming on.

  2. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    Especially considering the backhanded nature of the political concessions which helped save him in 1905; by February 1917 any concessions made or offered would have been treated with great scepticism. The Liberals, in a sense, learned a lesson from the superficiality of the October Manifesto.

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    The Tsar is as much to blame for his downfall as the First World War is. He was absolutely unsuited to be the ruler of such a diverse country, primarily because of his secluded childhood, which meant that he never grew an appreciation for how people lived, and his ideas about important issues were very independent.

  2. How far was the personality of Nicholas II responsible for the instability in Russia ...

    For instance, the people of Britain, France and Germany had gained significant political rights. In stark contrast, The Russian political system was still autocratic and repressive; it was medieval in character. Therefore, inspired by political developments Western Europe educated Russians like the liberals were even less willing to accept Russia's

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.