Niall Ashton

  1. Source A and B both talk about 2 attacks on the American destroyers called Maddox and Turner Joy this was called the Tonkin incident. Both of the sources also say that the boats were in North Vietnamese waters. Both also mention the same boats the Turner Joy and the Maddox. And also in both essays the Maddox gets attacked. Source A never says that the second attack happened because he says ‘the commander believed’ which then agrees with source B which says there was no attack.

There are many differences in the sources such as. Source A mentions the Turner Joy being attacked as well but source B calls it an ‘outright fabrication. Using my own knowledge I can say that the Maddox was attacked but the Turner Joy never had any evidence to prove that it was attacked.

Another difference is that source B says that there was no visual evidence of an enemy attack where as source A says they sunk a patrol boat and damaged 2. If there was no visual evidence how would they know if they damaged or sunk an enemy boat?

Source B doesn’t actually say that any of the US destroyers returned fire. Source A says that they were ordered to return fire but source B ignores this fact. I know that the Turner joy did return fire as they were ordered.

Join now!

Source B also does not mention the destroyers damaging or sinking any enemy boats. Source A says they were 2 damaged 1 sunk but source B does not mention an enemy patrol boat. Source B also mentions the radar on the Maddox having no contact with any vessel other than the Turner Joy.

In conclusion the sources have many differences and similarities. Source A is however mainly saying that both attacks happened and source B says the second didn’t. On the other hand both sources talk about the Gulf of Tonkin incident and both are talking about the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay