• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using your own knowledge, consider how far culture in the Third Reich was transformed because of the party's views on race

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using your own knowledge, consider how far culture in the Third Reich was transformed because of the party's views on race. The term "culture" is a very broad based one, which can cover the arts, human achievement, customs, traditions and people's understanding of them. What the Nazi Party tried to do, was not necessarily 'force' their views on the public, but attempt to tailor what was available to them in these fields and as a result, change people's attitudes towards certain ideas. It is debateable to what extent this was actually successful, as an accurate measure of this cannot be achieved. It would be impossible to gauge a representation of people's thoughts on this because so much of it went unnoticed. The Nazi's did succeed in manipulating what types of artistic expression were deemed acceptable and which types were derogatory, though how much was influenced by their racial ideologies is interesting. The NSDAP's racial prejudice was both positive - promoting the Aryan race and a pure German society - and negative, degrading the works of Jews, Blacks and non-German, non-traditionalist origins. One of the forms of art that would be seen by the majority of the nation was architecture. Hitler and the Nazi's were traditionalist and anti-modernist, which resulted in very conservative buildings, a Neo-Classical style. There were plenty of pillars and columns to show grandeur and exaggerate the height of the buildings. This can be seen in the "Haus der Kunst" which was designed by Troost. ...read more.

Middle

Benno Elkan was a sculptor who suffered under the Nazi rule. He was Jewish and many of his works were of Jewish derivation, such as the "Hanukah Lamp" and later on the "Menorah" which currently stands in Jerusalem. Because his works were not accepted in the new German culture, he joined the exodus of Jewish artists in 1933 and was forced to move to England. Sculpture and Architecture were both very public forms of propaganda for the Nazi Party, a measure for the general public to see how well the party was doing and effectively a show to prove that they could restore Germany to its former glory. In 1937, the Exhibition of Great German Art was held to display some of these sculptures, as well as paintings, and was an opportunity for artists to show the nation "true" German Art. Obviously this Exhibition only contained works of art that were "pure". Well over 16,000 works were submitted and of these 6,000 chosen to display in the museum. Again, everything was of positive racial prejudice, with depictions of Aryan peasant families, peasants working on the land and attempts to reflect the Volksgemeinschaft. There is an ironic juxtaposition here, contrasting the Nazi's enormous, impressive buildings to show to the world how well Germany was recovering under fascist ruling, yet the paintings show a very different portrait of Germany - one where the majority of people are farming, and this is done with only very basic equipment. ...read more.

Conclusion

Films however, were provided more as an entertainment source, to keep people off the streets, making them forget their worries and feel that things were getting better under the Third Reich. On the whole the Nazi's guarded many aspects of the 'outlet' of culture, but this was done for a large number of reasons. It seems apparent that the positive racial prejudice had more to play in the change of culture, rather than the degrading racial views that the NSDAP held. Culture was not left to change by itself, but was more of a controlled modification by the party, so we cannot, therefore, say that culture changed naturally, it was more forced into what it became. What the Nazi's created however, was a world of culture where everything was politically linked. It is true that the 'outlets' to the public were definitely influenced by the party's views on race, but how successful this was to sway the people's thoughts on the issues simply cannot be represented. It is debated as to whether people's taste changed as a result, or whether it was again forced to change, because everything was so manipulated according to the Nazi thought, people had to live with what was on offer. Comparing this to other fascist regimes, this was expected, as the entire ideology of fascism depends on conforming and social engineering to gain the greatest possible prosperity, whilst keeping the nation happy, in the belief that the regime is for the best. Word Count: 2408 1 Art Critic Berthold Hinz, Art and Power. Europe under the Dictators 1930 - 34, ed. D. Ades, 1995, pg. 332 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Flemming continues to argue that keywords from Wagner's work were commonplace in Hitler's speeches; words such as "elimination", "ridding" and "reduction". Again, his is a very tenuous link and can only be seen if you know what eventually happened. It can therefore be seen that Mein Kampf did not contain

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    that their similarities are fundamental and is what makes them both totalitarian dictators. Comparing Hitler and Stalin has always proving to be difficult task for historians as they were born 10 years apart in different countries and from different backgrounds.

  1. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    As the pace for rearmament grew, Hitler later replaced Schacht with Hermann Goering to be in charge of the Office of the Four-Year plan, which geared Germany for war within four years. The new economic organisation intervened throughout the economy to ensure that priority was to be given to rearmament, forming a managed economy.

  2. How Powerful was Hitler in the Third Reich?

    Despite now being a dictator, Hitler was aware that public opinion was extremely important. Therefore, unlike most dictators who alienated the public through their lust for power, Hitler was careful to remain popular - to the extent of immense propaganda campaigns.

  1. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    Leni felt that acting was the career for her and contacted Arnold Fanck (director), convincing him to put her in one of his films. * Leni Riefenstahl made her film debut in Holy Mountain in 1926, starring in five more films over the next seven years.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    peasantry and in 1927 there was only 28.000 tractors and illiteracy was 70% to 85%. 6. The peasantry made up 80% of the population. The communist Party had to work grip on the countryside and therefore a weak grip on the majority of the population.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    These Nazi officeholders presented a taste of what national rule would be like. They politicized all aspects of life under their control. In the state of Anhalt, they expelled the Bauhaus School of Design from Dessau because of its modern approach to architecture.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    He is a British historian therefore, has no real political perspective, and lacks personal ties and allegiance to the nation. He, and other consensus historians were not directly affected by the memories of the War, a valuable asset, enhancing the reliability of the source and his work on the whole; Ian Kershaw does not have any real reason for bias.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work