• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

what the Americans did in My Lai source work

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 3 Source A is a written extract from the book "Four Hours In My Lai" by Michael Bilton, published in 1992. It was written to justify what the Americans did in My Lai, or to defend their actions in My Lai. Its intended audience was the people of the world, and the general public, to give good reason for what the Americans did in My Lai. It is sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement because it gives reasons why the peace movement grew, for instance the substandard army and what happened in My Lai. And also I know from my own knowledge that black people were living in poor parts of society, therefore they had less money to pay for education, and consequently they were less educated and were sent into the army with less intelligence or qualifications. This can also be linked to source C in that it was used to shock the public. It is not fully sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement because it was published in 1992; this meant that it had no direct effect on the peace movement itself. The extract was very generalised, for instance when it says "a large majority of deaths took place in the first month". ...read more.

Middle

It was also made in 1967; this was before My Lai and the Tet Offensive. Therefore this means that Britain was against what the Americans were doing before the peace protests or any of the major attacks even started. However it is not sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement because it is only from a British perspective and therefore may be biased against the Americans, depending on the British take on the war. We don't know how many people saw the source; therefore it is difficult to say that it directly affected the protests. Also it was quite a long time before the events or the peace protests started. This means that it would not have directly affected them. Source E is a statement from BBC commentator Robin Day to a seminar of the Royal United Service Institution, in 1970. Its purpose was to inform the public of the power of television, and media in general. But it may also have been to provoke debate between the media and the American army. Its audience was the Royal United Service Institution. There were also members of the British armed forces in the audience. It is sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement because Robin Day was well known and a respected reporter. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, a message that is conveyed in more than one source is that the media had a phenomenal control over how the American public reacted in certain situations. They showed images of children being drowned in napalm, and of course there was going to be some reaction from the public. From my own knowledge I can see that the sources do not tackle certain issues such as: Drug addiction. They don't explain how much it damaged the economy or the amount of publicity that it was given, which in turn may have caused the peace protests. The statistics on the number of people killed, and the average age of the soldiers killed (which was 19) may have made parents and families of young soldiers in Vietnam join in the movements. None of the sources tell you about the effects of the Kent State University protests, where some students rioted and the police shot them. Nothing was mentioned about Martin Luther King or John Lennon joining in the peace protests, which would have, if celebrities were doing it, made more people want to join the rallies. The Tet Offensive, "Life" magazine publishings and Operation Phoenix were also never included in the sources. So ultimately I believe that the sources do not provide sufficient information to explain why there was an anti-war movement, but however they do provide a good insight into the war as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Question b) Study Sources B and C Which one of these to sources do you trust more? These two sources are useful to us as historians because we can look at both pieces of evidence and decide whether they're true or whether they're biased.

  2. Was the My Lai Massacre a failure in the Rules of Engagement or a ...

    My Lai was a reinterpretation of the Rules of Engagement by US Platoon leaders in an under supervised war. Vietnam Engagements had begun to violate the Rules of Engagement much earlier, and My Lai was the first to be recognized.

  1. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    The pensive expression upon Forrest's face tells us that he is finally come to terms with his inner conflict, thus he announces that he is ready to return home. The astonishment shows on the faces around him, this does not deter him in any way though!

  2. Vietnam source based work

    This meant that more soldiers would be taken out as they would have to carry the soldier whose limbs had been destroyed. It also used up medical staff. This was a very clever tactic used by the Vietnamese to take out more soldiers and to lower the moral of the American soldiers.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    Sources B, C and E help us to understand the role of the media during the conflict. Source B is a famous photograph that shows children running followed by American soldiers and imparticular a naked girl running and screaming with severe, distressing napalm burns.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    He proudly wears the colours of the old red, white and blue, while I wear a heartache since he left me for you. Dear Uncle Sam, I just got your telegram, and I can't believe that it is me shakin' like I am, for it said, "I'm sorry to inform you..."

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    In return for Soviet assistance in the invasion of Japan (which was eventually not needed), it was agreed that certain possessions in the Far East and rights in Manchuria, lost to the Japanese long before, would be restored to the USSR.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    The photographer isn't identified and it doesn't state where the photo was taken and you can't tell people saw it and if they reacted. Source C is a written extract by an American journalist called Richard Hammer in 1970. The source is about the wide spread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work