• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was "appeasement"?

Extracts from this document...


What was "appeasement"? The definition of appeasement is to pacify someone, to avoid war at nearly all costs. It is more famously recognised as the policy implemented by Neville Chamberlain, following Hitler's attempts at taking over territory in Europe, prior to War World 2. Indications of appeasement could be witnessed during the 20s and early 30s. After World War 1, Britain definitely did not want another war. It was always looking to avoid military opposition with Hitler. In early 1938 when Hitler condemned what he called, the persecution of Germans by Czechs in the Sudetenland, Chamberlain searched for a way to resolve potential conflict peacefully. The attempted settlement of the Sudetenland crisis resulted in the Munich agreement. On 30 September 1938, Chamberlain established with Hitler that the 'German' parts of Czechoslovakia constituted Hitler's territory. Both parties agreed to avoid war. Britain was financially unprepared for war and the Allies were in fear of Communism spreading in Europe if Germany became weak. Chamberlain realised that Hitler's hunger for territory was unlimited, when Germany invaded Czechoslovakia in 1939. ...read more.


immediate evacuation of the Rhineland."2 Churchill blames the British authority for not being strong from the start, which otherwise would not have invited trouble. This suggests that some Contemporaries supported appeasement while others did not. Historians who lived through World War 2 wrote about their experiences with an emotional response. After suffering a war, they were looking for people to blame for the catastrophic consequences of appeasement. Such historians use the "Guilty Men" theory, which labelled certain figures as those responsible for the war. " . . . Austria has now been laid in thrall, and we do not know whether Czechoslovakia will not suffer a similar attack."3 Churchill emphasises the unpredictability of Hitler's actions and that it is likely he will attack Czechoslovakia. Churchill is laying the blame for this on Britain. Revisionists primarily wrote about appeasement during the 50s/60s, with a more rational approach. "His motive throughout was the general pacification of Europe. He was driven on by hope, not fear."4 Taylor is backing Chamberlain and his decision to implement the policy in 1938. He explains that Chamberlain was always searching for ways to make settlements in Europe. ...read more.


Overall, I believe that historians have differed in their views of appeasement because of when they wrote the sources. It also depends on the type of historian and whether they belong to a political party. " . . . it looked as if he might be succeeded by the Foreign Secretary, Lord Halifax, one of Michael Foot's 'Guilty Men'."7 Barbara Castle, a Labour politician portrays the negative outlook to Halifax, a Conservative politician who was labelled as one of the 'Guilty Men.' So ultimately, historians have differed as they have written at different times, with different perspectives and with different amounts of information available to them. 1 Speech given in defence of the Munich Agreement, Neville Chamberlain - 3 Oct 1938. 2 Should Britain not have made a stand in 1936? - Winston Churchill, 22 February 1938. 3 Ibid. 4 A move away from the "Guilty Men" Idea - The Origins of the Second World War, AJP Taylor, 1961 5 An argument for Chamberlain not being a pacifist. 6 "Conflicts over Possible Alternatives to Appeasement in the 1930s", Michael J Carley - revised 1997. 7 Memoirs of Lord Halifax - "Fighting All The Way", Barbara castle, 1993. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    In late 1980, after a series of meetings with Begin, he reportedly obtained a secret Israeli pledge to provide a defensive umbrella against a potential Syrian air attack. This pledge virtually committed Israel to fight Syria at Gemayel's behest, although Israel admonished the Lebanese Forces not to attack the Syrians.

  2. Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill Focusing on his Political Career

    In the general election of 1906 Churchill secured a notable victory in Manchester and began his ministerial career in the new Liberal government as undersecretary of state for the colonies. One of his tours to inspect colonies in East Africa resulted in another book, My African Journey (1908).

  1. Dtente, meaning and definition.

    D�tente cannot change that. The nuclear age compels us to coexist. Rhetorical crusades cannot change that either. In late eighties detente entered the phase in which even ideological warfare was mellowed down and gradually it faded out more or less completely in the early nineties.

  2. Communist Purification in Czechoslovakia.

    Also many of the Czechoslovak representatives and governmental officials used to be trained and educated in the Soviet Union and therefore the government sometimes played a two-faced, or in other words a diplomatic, role. Even though Brezhnev did not really have a clear and solid motive for invading Czechoslovakia, he

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work