• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chartism What was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little? Chartism was a movement established and controlled by workingmen in 1836 to achieve parliamentary democracy in order to achieve social and economic reform. The People's Charter, formed in 1838 by William Lovett, the Chartist leader was at the heart of a radical campaign for parliamentary reform of the problems remaining after the Reform Act of 1832. The six main demands of the chartists were as follows; votes for all men, equal electoral districts, payment for MPs, the secret ballot, annual general elections, and abolition of the requirement that MPs be property owners. By 1839 the Chartists had obtained one and a quarter million signatures in support of reform and presented the Charter to the House of Commons. It was, however rejected by a vote of 235 to 46. A second petition of around three million signatures was rejected in 1842, and the rejection of the third petition in 1848 saw the end of the Chartist movement. There were a variety of causes of Chartism. These can be split up into two main sections, political causes and economic causes. Firstly, one of the main, and probably key causes of the rise of Chartism is the fact that the working classes were disappointed with the 1832 Reform Act. ...read more.

Middle

Essentially, Chartism was at an end by 1848, after the third petition had been rejected by Parliament. Although a few supporters remained it would never have the same number of supporters as it once did. The reasons behind this failure have been much debated by many historians and there are various theories as to why the Chartists didn't succeed in getting their reforms passed, especially when one contrasts the Chartists with the success of other groups such as the Anti Corn Law League. Most historians do agree however that the main reason for failure was simply because their demands were never going to be accepted by the Parliament of the time and were far too drastic. This was because after 1832 parliament was still dominated by the aristocracy and they certainly did not want to accept reforms that would result in themselves losing power or letting the lower classes gain power and become a threat. A further explanation of the failure of Chartism is the fact that the middle classes either ignored or shunned Chartism. Whilst many were in favour of reform and agreed with much of what the Chartists were fighting for, they were put off by the Chartists' violence, so they would never come out in open support for them and opted to support the Anti Corn Law League instead. ...read more.

Conclusion

These demands mainly came into being by the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884. It was the 1918 Representation of the People Act, which also gave the vote to women over 30. The only demand that has not been passed is for annual general elections. Additionally, it can be seen that the Chartists were a success as many of the Chartists beliefs have been passed onto other groups, that perhaps follow on from the fight that the Chartists began. The Chartists showed the public that one could stand up to the government. Also, it could be argued that the Chartists showed other groups what not to do. For example, the Anti Corn League learned from the Chartists' mistakes and as a result were perhaps more successful. Also it can be seen that it was the pressure by the Chartists that brought about certain reforms such as the 1842 Mines Act and the 1844 Factory Act, thus showing that Chartism did have some elements of success. In conclusion it can be seen that ultimately the Chartist movement was a failure in the short term as none of the six demands were achieved. There were almost as many types of Chartism as there were Chartists and this was a factor against its immediate success although the movement was significant in terms of the development of working class movements. ?? ?? ?? ?? Dan Leeder ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. At was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little?

    In general, the working classes were miserable living in increasing poverty and increasingly convinced those above them were putting them in the worst conditions possible. The sizes of boroughs still varied too much, and there was no secret ballot, so corruption and intimidation was still a problem.

  2. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    a man with little or no sympathy for Puritanism, who had a sense of the importance of uniformity and authority in the Church, to succeed Grindal. His approach is reflected in his attempt to impose the three articles in 1583 on all ministers which required full acceptance of the RS,

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    He was arguably the most important reason for the passing of the Reform Bill. William IV, brother of George IV, began his short reign in 1830. The reform of Parliament had by now become the burning issue. Extreme Tories, led by the Duke of Wellington, stood fast against it.

  2. UNIT 5 PAPER 5A: REPRESENTATION AND DEMOCRACY IN BRITAIN, 1830-1931

    * However, early twentieth century was a time of industrial agitation; syndicalist movement, 41 million working days lost in 1912; economic depression; the rise in New Unionism since 1890's; government being involved in armed conflict v strikers (e.g. Glasgow 1912); growing awareness of socialism and communism in Europe.

  1. Reform Chartism

    and business interest- alliance between Whig aristocrats and middle class radicals- foundation of emerging Liberal party * Leadership, control of policy and social composition of MP's changed very little from 1832- 1867 Reform Act * Major aim of 1832- preserve influence of aristocracy over political process * Post 1832- old

  2. HOW IMPORTANT WAS DISAPPOINTMENT WITH THE GREAT REFORM ACT IN EXPLAINING THE RISE OF ...

    Also supporting the interpretation that Chartism was borne out of the political frustration of the working classes was the anti-Poor Law campaign, arguably the most punitive law introduced by the post-Reform Parliament: to many of the working classes, it was tantamount to robbing them out of poor relief and forcing them into workhouses, for which conditions were made intentionally abysmal.

  1. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    want to been seem supporting a group that uses violent to get what it wants, as it would be seem as bad press and weak for a leader to give in. this also the view of many of the public and many women why should I support something that uses violence and not word to get its point across.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * Local papers were generally more sympathetic to the cause, whilst many suffragists and suffragettes published their own papers, eg. The WSPU ? ?Suffragette? How did different suffrage societies react to the outbreak of war in 1914? The WSPU * On August 10th 1914, six days after war was declared,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work