• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chartism What was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little? Chartism was a movement established and controlled by workingmen in 1836 to achieve parliamentary democracy in order to achieve social and economic reform. The People's Charter, formed in 1838 by William Lovett, the Chartist leader was at the heart of a radical campaign for parliamentary reform of the problems remaining after the Reform Act of 1832. The six main demands of the chartists were as follows; votes for all men, equal electoral districts, payment for MPs, the secret ballot, annual general elections, and abolition of the requirement that MPs be property owners. By 1839 the Chartists had obtained one and a quarter million signatures in support of reform and presented the Charter to the House of Commons. It was, however rejected by a vote of 235 to 46. A second petition of around three million signatures was rejected in 1842, and the rejection of the third petition in 1848 saw the end of the Chartist movement. There were a variety of causes of Chartism. These can be split up into two main sections, political causes and economic causes. Firstly, one of the main, and probably key causes of the rise of Chartism is the fact that the working classes were disappointed with the 1832 Reform Act. ...read more.

Middle

Essentially, Chartism was at an end by 1848, after the third petition had been rejected by Parliament. Although a few supporters remained it would never have the same number of supporters as it once did. The reasons behind this failure have been much debated by many historians and there are various theories as to why the Chartists didn't succeed in getting their reforms passed, especially when one contrasts the Chartists with the success of other groups such as the Anti Corn Law League. Most historians do agree however that the main reason for failure was simply because their demands were never going to be accepted by the Parliament of the time and were far too drastic. This was because after 1832 parliament was still dominated by the aristocracy and they certainly did not want to accept reforms that would result in themselves losing power or letting the lower classes gain power and become a threat. A further explanation of the failure of Chartism is the fact that the middle classes either ignored or shunned Chartism. Whilst many were in favour of reform and agreed with much of what the Chartists were fighting for, they were put off by the Chartists' violence, so they would never come out in open support for them and opted to support the Anti Corn Law League instead. ...read more.

Conclusion

These demands mainly came into being by the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884. It was the 1918 Representation of the People Act, which also gave the vote to women over 30. The only demand that has not been passed is for annual general elections. Additionally, it can be seen that the Chartists were a success as many of the Chartists beliefs have been passed onto other groups, that perhaps follow on from the fight that the Chartists began. The Chartists showed the public that one could stand up to the government. Also, it could be argued that the Chartists showed other groups what not to do. For example, the Anti Corn League learned from the Chartists' mistakes and as a result were perhaps more successful. Also it can be seen that it was the pressure by the Chartists that brought about certain reforms such as the 1842 Mines Act and the 1844 Factory Act, thus showing that Chartism did have some elements of success. In conclusion it can be seen that ultimately the Chartist movement was a failure in the short term as none of the six demands were achieved. There were almost as many types of Chartism as there were Chartists and this was a factor against its immediate success although the movement was significant in terms of the development of working class movements. ?? ?? ?? ?? Dan Leeder ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. At was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little?

    In general, the working classes were miserable living in increasing poverty and increasingly convinced those above them were putting them in the worst conditions possible. The sizes of boroughs still varied too much, and there was no secret ballot, so corruption and intimidation was still a problem.

  2. UNIT 5 PAPER 5A: REPRESENTATION AND DEMOCRACY IN BRITAIN, 1830-1931

    * Speaker's Conference (1916) made up from all parties and came to an agreement to extend the franchise (thought here was to be much debate on the way it was to be given to women). * Lord Curzon, member of the Coalition government and President of the League Opposing Woman

  1. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    So if they all worked as one unit and not many different groups doing their own thing, they would of got there point across and would of got more support then they did if the all worked as one unit and not many smaller groups fighting for the same cause.

  2. HOW IMPORTANT WAS DISAPPOINTMENT WITH THE GREAT REFORM ACT IN EXPLAINING THE RISE OF ...

    Also supporting the interpretation that Chartism was borne out of the political frustration of the working classes was the anti-Poor Law campaign, arguably the most punitive law introduced by the post-Reform Parliament: to many of the working classes, it was tantamount to robbing them out of poor relief and forcing them into workhouses, for which conditions were made intentionally abysmal.

  1. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    - he found that out of 15 asked, 10 approved, and only 1, Bishop Scory of Hereford, saw them as a threat. Grindal sent a letter to Elizabeth which defended prophesyings, discussed ways to control them, and finally implied that Elizabeth should recognize the need to please God and not just herself - "you are a mortal creature.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    economical slump and this meant, like in Britain, between 1810 and 1825 there were severe agricultural problems. This was one of the causes of the French Revolution because it increased the French people's problems and made their anger stronger. This was also the case in Britain between 1810 and 1825 because there were many agricultural problems.

  1. Reform Chartism

    debated on crucial votes in Parliament reflected the looseness of party discipline among MP's at this time * Fewer working class voters after 1832 than before due to irregularities in voting rules * Key aim of 1832 to side middle class with ruling classes Mid 19th century- partnership between landowning

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    WORKING TOGETHER!! The WSPU became ardent supporters of the war effort * Symbolised to rename their paper ?Empire? in 1915. They called for the conscription of men and women (to the armed services and industrial services) respectively and supported the abolition of trade Unions (lost socialist and working class roots).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work