• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little?

Extracts from this document...


Chartism What was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little? Chartism was a movement established and controlled by workingmen in 1836 to achieve parliamentary democracy in order to achieve social and economic reform. The People's Charter, formed in 1838 by William Lovett, the Chartist leader was at the heart of a radical campaign for parliamentary reform of the problems remaining after the Reform Act of 1832. The six main demands of the chartists were as follows; votes for all men, equal electoral districts, payment for MPs, the secret ballot, annual general elections, and abolition of the requirement that MPs be property owners. By 1839 the Chartists had obtained one and a quarter million signatures in support of reform and presented the Charter to the House of Commons. It was, however rejected by a vote of 235 to 46. A second petition of around three million signatures was rejected in 1842, and the rejection of the third petition in 1848 saw the end of the Chartist movement. There were a variety of causes of Chartism. These can be split up into two main sections, political causes and economic causes. Firstly, one of the main, and probably key causes of the rise of Chartism is the fact that the working classes were disappointed with the 1832 Reform Act. ...read more.


Essentially, Chartism was at an end by 1848, after the third petition had been rejected by Parliament. Although a few supporters remained it would never have the same number of supporters as it once did. The reasons behind this failure have been much debated by many historians and there are various theories as to why the Chartists didn't succeed in getting their reforms passed, especially when one contrasts the Chartists with the success of other groups such as the Anti Corn Law League. Most historians do agree however that the main reason for failure was simply because their demands were never going to be accepted by the Parliament of the time and were far too drastic. This was because after 1832 parliament was still dominated by the aristocracy and they certainly did not want to accept reforms that would result in themselves losing power or letting the lower classes gain power and become a threat. A further explanation of the failure of Chartism is the fact that the middle classes either ignored or shunned Chartism. Whilst many were in favour of reform and agreed with much of what the Chartists were fighting for, they were put off by the Chartists' violence, so they would never come out in open support for them and opted to support the Anti Corn Law League instead. ...read more.


These demands mainly came into being by the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884. It was the 1918 Representation of the People Act, which also gave the vote to women over 30. The only demand that has not been passed is for annual general elections. Additionally, it can be seen that the Chartists were a success as many of the Chartists beliefs have been passed onto other groups, that perhaps follow on from the fight that the Chartists began. The Chartists showed the public that one could stand up to the government. Also, it could be argued that the Chartists showed other groups what not to do. For example, the Anti Corn League learned from the Chartists' mistakes and as a result were perhaps more successful. Also it can be seen that it was the pressure by the Chartists that brought about certain reforms such as the 1842 Mines Act and the 1844 Factory Act, thus showing that Chartism did have some elements of success. In conclusion it can be seen that ultimately the Chartist movement was a failure in the short term as none of the six demands were achieved. There were almost as many types of Chartism as there were Chartists and this was a factor against its immediate success although the movement was significant in terms of the development of working class movements. ?? ?? ?? ?? Dan Leeder ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. At was the nature of Chartism? Why did it achieve so little?

    In general, the working classes were miserable living in increasing poverty and increasingly convinced those above them were putting them in the worst conditions possible. The sizes of boroughs still varied too much, and there was no secret ballot, so corruption and intimidation was still a problem.

  2. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    a man with little or no sympathy for Puritanism, who had a sense of the importance of uniformity and authority in the Church, to succeed Grindal. His approach is reflected in his attempt to impose the three articles in 1583 on all ministers which required full acceptance of the RS,


    Internal Parliamentary Pressures Women * Liberal government (1906-) believed to be more sympathetic than Tories. Lloyd George known to be in favour. * Succession of parliamentary bills brought forward by backbenchers 1908-11. In H of C, majority voted in favour of women gaining the vote 1912/13. * NUWSS supported Labour with a fighting fund and a number of Liberals lost by elections 1911-14 as a result.


    Also supporting the interpretation that Chartism was borne out of the political frustration of the working classes was the anti-Poor Law campaign, arguably the most punitive law introduced by the post-Reform Parliament: to many of the working classes, it was tantamount to robbing them out of poor relief and forcing them into workhouses, for which conditions were made intentionally abysmal.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    The Whigs coming to power in government had a large effect on the passing of the Reform Bill of 1832 because the new government was for parliamentary reform. William IV had a very important effect in the passing of the Reform Bill of 1832.

  2. Reform Chartism

    debated on crucial votes in Parliament reflected the looseness of party discipline among MP's at this time * Fewer working class voters after 1832 than before due to irregularities in voting rules * Key aim of 1832 to side middle class with ruling classes Mid 19th century- partnership between landowning

  1. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    there minds if the public support was great, as they want to be in power and will follow public view if they have too. You can link with not enough support is that of the violent protest, as this would of stopped powerful people supporting them as they don not

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    Over a thousand suffragettes were forcibly fed through their nose, mouth even rectum and vagina. * The Government choose its victims carefully, e.g. the case of Lady Constance Lytton (Joan Wharton). Allowed the WSPU to draw attention to class divisions in prison and society at large, that would end, they claimed when women gained the right to vote.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work