• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did Britain go to war over Poland?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did Britain go to war over Poland? Britain and France chose to go to war with Germany in September 1939. The reasons behind this decision are based on the changes that occurred in public opinion in Britain after the Munich Agreement. Despite initial delight at having avoided war many had a feeling of guilt and betrayal which grew after Hitler sent troops into the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939. Hitler had broken his promise made to Chamberlain at Munich and the British public felt, by 1939 that German aggression had to be stopped. Hitler demanded Memel and Bohemia-Moravia and finally Poland. These demands proved that he had to be stopped by force and created an ever growing pro-war group in Parliament led by Winston Churchill who was anti-appeasement. At this time many were starting to realise the actual nature of the Nazi regime. ...read more.


Britain and France therefore realised that the ideal time to act was in 1939 as public opinion had turned against appeasement and British forces were now ready. For his part Hitler probably did not want a war with Great Britain and France in 1939, in actual fact he was devastated when they declared war. He didn't realise that there had been a shift in public opinion or understood that Britain's guarantee to protect Poland, March 1939, was serious. Britain and France had tried to avert war by allying with Russia in the summer of 1939. However, both sides were too suspicious of one another. Instead Stalin signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939 to delay an inevitable German Invasion. Hitler also believed that without Russian support, Great Britain and France would not go to war over Poland, as they could not help Poland as they were so far away. ...read more.


World War would have been permanently averted or perhaps by delaying until 139, Britain re-armed enough to defend herself in the Battle of Britain in 1940. It is impossible ultimately to judge which action would have had the best outcome for Britain. In conclusion Britain went to war over Poland not only because it had to stop Germany's aggression to other countries, but also because it was the best time to do so. The British and French armed forces were reaching the peak of rearmament and air defences were strong. This helped to turn public opinion in favour of stopping the aggression by Hitler, as there was less fear of bombing and a greater awareness of the need to stop Hitler's aggresion. Overall had Britain and France not have acted then the outcome of the Second World War may have been totally different as they may not have had the strength to stand up to Germany's ever increasing armed forces. Ramesh Kanesan - UVC ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Historians J. Arch Getty and Lynne Vola are insistent that the social upheavals were not simply imposed from above, but that Stalin's plans found clear resonance 'below', in the party and in Society. 13. Tractors, kerosene, salt, matches and soap were all promised to the peasants if they joined the Kolkhoz.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The Nazis feared another election campaign. After the July 31 Reichstag elections, they were psychologically and financially unprepared for another vigorous campaign. The Nazis' fears seemed justified: their vote fell from 37 to 33 percent, with a corresponding decrease in Reichstag seats to 196. It was a costly defeat for the Nazis.

  1. Vietnam war

    * The NVA and NLF regular forces engaged US troops in major conventional battles once or twice a year to maximise US casualties. * Giap's overall strategy was to prolong the war, to destabilise the Saigon Government and to reduce public support in the USA for the war.

  2. 'At Munich Hitler gained what he wanted and achieved conquest without firing a shot' ...

    Suggesting Total war. Hitler then goes on to say 14 'we will deal with the situation in the east first. (Czechoslovakia) Then I shall give you three or four years and then we will sort out things in the west' Wiedermann explains that with 'things in the west' Hitler meant war with Britain and France.

  1. Was appeasement the only option open to Britain in 1938-1939?

    and therefore there was a common belief that it was not worth risking lives to defend the borders. Czechoslovakia was also quite away from Britain's sphere of power and therefore there was an understanding that in providing proper protection they would probably trigger another full scale European war, something both

  2. The Battle of Britain

    Repercussions followed immediately, a revolt in Sudetenland with serious fighting and the Czech Government introducing marshal law. The British and the French held immediate discussions as to whether they should abide by their treaty obligations and stand by Czechoslovakia. On September 12th1938 at 11pm the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sent an urgent dispatch to Adolph Hitler.

  1. Explain the role of Czechoslovakia in the appeasement story.

    Finally the takeover of Austria came in March 1938. After this Czechoslovakia was clearly the next victim. In Austria, German pressures made the Austrian Chancellor resign and Britain's complaints were not heeded. Austria was the first boulder in a massive landslide and when Anchluss was made the Austrians were very happy.

  2. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    Especially the Liberal party of the time who were the most consistent critics of the policy. As it became evident that the policy of appeasement had failed in 1939 and that Britain would in fact go to war, the Liberal Leader Sir Archibald Sinclair expressed his feelings on the achievements

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work