• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Civil War break out in 1642?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Civil War break out in 1642? Many factors led to the outbreak of civil war, while there can be no one certain cause, many different events and issues contributed to the war. This is a topic of much debate, many historians have differing views on the start of the war and the events that led to it. The Whig interpretation is an overriding belief that parliament should have had more control. While studying the period in the eighteenth century, they were influenced by their time, they thought that England had the greatest Parliamentary system in the world, and thought that a civil war was inevitable as the child (parliament) was beginning to conflict with its parent (the monarchy and Charles I). They blamed the war on long term political causes like the tension between the King and Parliament. Marxist historians from the 1920s through to the 1950s believed that events were caused by class conflicts. They studied the ideals of Karl Marx, perhaps one of the most influential figures in the birth of communism, they came to the conclusion that the Gentry was attempting to gain power by attacking the old order of things, the King and the Aristocracy. ...read more.


There were political factors the led to the outbreak of war, the power struggle between the king and parliament, pitting the Divine Right of Kings and the Royal Prerogative against Parliament and the will of the people. Certainly the Eleven years personal rule would have contributed greatly to the tension between monarch and parliament, but would this have been sufficient to start a war? Most definitely not, Parliament had been able to prevent any further attempt at this with the Triennial Act and had removed Strafford and Laud the 'evil advisors' this would be enough to keep the King in line, at least for the time being. The issue of religion was also very contentious, the people were growing increasingly concerned over the apparent reintroduction of Catholicism. The attempt of Charles I to introduce the Anglican prayer book into Scotland was an abysmal failure, and eventually led to the First Bishop's War, the Godly Puritans of Scotland resisted and ultimately managed to force Charles I to recall Parliament in order to fund his war. ...read more.


When the Long Parliament met in 1640, there was no possibility of a civil war as Charles I had very little support, politically or military. Inflation had hit England hard in the 1640's and the peasants were suffering immensely. Charles I needed to focus his attention on foreign affairs, the Irish had so far been quelled by Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford. Once he was executed by Parliament for treason there was no authoritarian to subdue the violent Irish people. This led to a lot of tension between Charles and Parliament over how to handle the situation. The Scots also proved troublesome, after the Bishop's wars hostilities were rife between the two countries even though Charles was the reigning King of both countries. The Civil war was a combination of long term, short term and trigger causes, there was no single event that led directly to war, however many key issues such as the personal rule and high levels of tension between King and Parliament led to a Civil War. Matt Sharpe 22/11/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did the Civil war break out in 1642?

    Both sides knew what they wanted and would not give in until they got it. As neither side would give in they both just carried on arguing until it led to a war. Charles wanted complete Divine Right of King and Parliament wanted more power over England.

  2. Why did the civil war break out in 1642?

    Nearly all MPs opposed Charles but no one was talking of war against him.

  1. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    According to Conrad Russell13 in his book The Crisis of Parliaments Pym's greatest achievement was probably the creation of a financial and administrative machine which, in the long run, would enable parliament to win the war. Here, Russell openly states that Pym's role, more specifically his role in creating the financial system, was a factor in winning the war.


    The money worries of Charles however, gave him a disadvantage. He finally lost the power struggle with parliament and they directly challenged him in 1642.

  1. Why did the Civil War break out?

    Charles then ruled without Parliament from 1629 to 1640. This was because parliament criticised him many times. They also accused him and his friend - Archbishop Laud of "Popery" (supporting Catholics). Charles earned money by introducing ancient laws. People would be forced to pay penalties for not paying laws that hadn't been used for hundreds of years.

  2. Why did Civil war break out in 1642?

    Prynne's cheeks were seared with an iron made exceeding hot, after which the executioner cut off one of his ears and a piece of his cheek; then hacking the other ear almost off, left it hanging" Another problem apart from religion was that king Charles began collecting taxes without parliament's permission.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work