• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The Revolutions Of 1820-1831 In The Italian States Fail?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The Revolutions Of 1820-1831 Fail? The year 1815 saw the restoration of the monarchy in the Italian states. This was met with great dissatisfaction by a high amount of middle class citizens, who saw this reactionary revert to pre-Napoleonic times as restricting and unfavourable, as during the French Rule, all were equal in the eye of the law, and had more freedom through a fairer system. This led to the foundation of revolutionary organizations, most notably the Adelfi, Carbonari and the Italian Federation. Their desires were to eliminate Austrian influence and unify the Italian states as one. There were then revolutions in Naples (1820), Sicily (1820), Piedmont (1821) and Modena, Parma & Papal States (1831). However, these failed due to a number of reasons, and these will be looked at in the course of this essay. One significant reason for these failures was the constant intervention of Austria and Klemens von Metternich. Metternich dominated European foreign policy and opposed any kind of revolution. For example, he was shocked that the Neapolitan revolution in 1821 was proving to be a success, and considered it to be disturbing. Therefore, he took measures to suppress these events at every opportunity. ...read more.


As well as that, Austria would not have looked upon the country that had assisted the Italian states favourably, so for a country such as France, it would only be creating problems that they did not need. Not only were foreign countries unwilling to contribute to rebellions: Because revolutions were often a local affair to rise against circumstantial and distinctive issues (for example, King Ferdinand I increasing the Church's power to censor challenging literature in Naples in 1818), it was a concern of that state and that state only - And as other neighbouring states were unaffected by these issues, they saw no reason to intervene. After all, different states had concerns of their own. An example of this would be the revolution of Modena in 1831, where Bologna refused to send help - they were suffering through the Papal restoration during this time. This prevented Modena from having the strength and resources to succeed in their attempt at a revolution. While revolutionary organizations struggled to attract co-operation between bordering states, the organizations themselves had trouble in concerns to the amount of people involved in rebellions. Less than ten percent of the population were involved in these groups, the most popular of which was the Carbonari. ...read more.


This arguably resulted in a lesser degree of commitment and therefore, not enough effort was made to make some revolutions successful. After addressing all of the factors in how the revolutions of 1820-1831 were unsuccessful, I can come to a conclusion on what I believe were the most significant. There were minor problems, such as fear of a "Mob Rule" and the lack of leadership, greater problems, such as the co-operation of organizations, the lack of support and absence of foreign assistance, and significant complications, like the government's insufficient military resources, and Austrian intervention and influence, particularly that of Metternich. In conclusion, I believe that Austria was the clearest reason for the failure of the revolutions. Firstly, they had control over the Italian states. They were states for a reason - to fragment organizations such as the Carbonari and the Adelfi and keep them weak to prevent outbursts of rebellion. Secondly, it did not matter if a revolution was beginning to look like it could end successfully. The monarch of the state (for example Ferdinand I or Victor Emmanuel I) had the authority to allow Austria and Metternich to intervene wherever necessary to quell the threat of an uprising. Finally, the Austrian empire was powerful and the Italian revolutionists had no chance of fighting against this if intervention had been called for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the 1848 revolutions in italy fail?

    This lack of support from the masses meant revolutionaries could not maintain power once gained it. However, the exception to this is Sicily where the majority of civilians were involved in marching in the islands capital, Palermo as the government repression coincided with an outbreak of cholera which therefore affected all classes of people.

  2. Compare and access the main reasons for the failure of the Italian revolutions due ...

    This had a negative affect on the middle class who felt freedom of speech and expression was become more and more limited. The King was having economic problems with his lack of money; he decided to cut public spending with things such as improving the harbours, halting projects such as

  1. Hitler and the Secret Societies.

    Moreover, it cannot be established whether these practices were employed in the Thule Society that Sebottendorf headed. It would be very important to know that, because many top-ranking National Socialist personalities, from Hitler to Rudolf Hess, frequented this society. In a way, Hitler was already introduced to the world of

  2. 1798 Irish Rebellion notes

    in 1798, while Wexford - a county remarkable for its agrarian harmony - rebelled. 3. More remarkable (and innovative) still was the manner in which the United Irishmen were briefly successful in turning existing feelings of local identity into a bonding agent for political mobilization and military cohesion.

  1. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    taking of Venetia and the absence of French troops in Rome completed the unification process. Hence, foreign influence was a powerful factor in creating liberal and republican ideologies as well as creating the right situation in order for Italian aspirations of unification to materialise.

  2. Why did the early revolutions fail to unite Italy?

    Another example of the power of Austria was in Piedmont. After the news of Naples reached the liberals in Piedmont a revolutionary government run by the Carbonari was set up in the town of Alessandria. An army mutiny in Turin force Emmanuel to abdicate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work