• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the Whites lost the Civil War of Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Paper 1: Russia Why the Whites lost the Civil War of Russia Between 1918 and 1920, there was a civil war between the `Red' Russians and the `White' Russians. The Bolsheviks themselves represented the Civil War as a class war, but it was never simply this. The sheer size of Russia often meant that local or regional considerations predominated over larger ideological issues. Introduction According to Wade, the Russian civil war might better be referred to as a series of plural, civil wars, It was in fact a complex, multi- phased event, with overlapping military, economic, national, international and other conflicts. The Bolsheviks saw themselves engaged in an international civil war, a violent international class war, as revolution spread across Europe and then the world. By the beginning of 1920, the Red Army, had for all intents and purposes, won the civil war. Soon most of the territory of Imperial Russia was under Soviet control except for "Poland, Finland and the Baltic states of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania which became independent. In 1921-22 the Red army crushed the last remaining armed forces opposing the communist regime - the peasant armies often called 'Greens' Why the Reds won the Civil War According to Pipes, the victory of the Red Army was a foregone conclusion. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky, the Commissar of War, was chiefly responsible for the successful military operations. He exercised a central command over the whole army, emphasizing discipline and obedience. The commanders of the Red Army were staffed with former Tsarist officers who were willing to co-operate. Officers were punishable by death if they were defeated in a single battle. Fear of death compelled the Red Army to fight bravely. In contrast, the White Army had poor discipline. They were uncoordinated in their war efforts. The White Army took food from the peasants and so did not have economic support from the peasants. The workers rallied behind the Bolsheviks. They peasants did the same because they feared that once the Whites were in power, they would repudiate the Bolsheviks' decree of giving land to them. 1. Disunity of the White armies Pipes: "the critical advantage the Reds enjoyed was that they were one and their enemies many." � The various White armies fought as separate detachments. The White General often acted independently and were thus unable to coordinate his command � They had a common aim: to overthrow the Bolsheviks, that was all. ...read more.

Conclusion

Indeed, by the end of the Civil War whatever initial peasant sympathy they had gained had been lost by the severity of their grain- requisitioning methods. It was that the Whites failed to present themselves as a better alternative � The Whites advocated the return to the pre-revolutionary past � The Reds spread the propaganda that the lands which the peasants seized would be forfeited if the Whites regained power 5. Morale of the army of the Reds and Whites were badly affected by poor leadership and infighting I � Trotsky created an army which proved capable of fighting; they had an unshakeable belief in their own victory � Whites on the other hand, uncoordinated collection of separation forces � The Red Army was the military arm of a civilian government whereas the White armies were a military force that also had to act as a government � The political differences between the uncertain grouping of dispossessed socialists, liberals and moderates made sure that they stayed disunited; in fact led them to bitter disputes � Hence, the Whites deeply divided: those who were fighting for local separatism versus those who wanted a return to strong central government � The Whites lacked leadership. No White leader of the stature of Trotsky or Lenin emerged, around whom an effective anti-Bolshevik army could unite ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    over in November 1919, it did so with the willing participation of large numbers of peasant recruits. Moreover, one may argue that had the help offered by the Allies been more enthusiastic, the Whites may have been able to mend their military weaknesses, as the supplies sent in 1919 were

  2. How were the reds able to defeat the whites in the Russian civil war

    They also took all the grain and food the peasants had so they could feed the soldiers and the people in the towns and cities. They even took the grain they had to plant for next yers crops. This caused one of the worst famines ever recorded.

  1. Why did the Reds win and the Whites lose the civil war?

    Although the Whites were supplied with help from the Allies this help was insufficient to make a major impact on the war, and was removed early on.

  2. Why did the Reds win the civil war

    The civil war was fought in three main stages. In the first stage resistance to the Bolsheviks was established when anti Bolshevik governments were established around the Don region of Russian which was the location of many tsarist supporters, However during this period fighting was limited as the Red army was not totally established at this point.

  1. American History.

    - Meanwhile, African Americans were also adapting parts of American culture to help them [the liberty, equality deal] and, as evangelicals became less egalitarian, began forming their own Baptist/Methodist congregations. These were sometimes used to plan revolts, such as Gabriel's Revolt (1800)

  2. American Civil War (1861-1865).

    would free all slaves in areas rebelling against the United States, effective January 1, 1863. 1863 In January, in an effort to placate the slave-holding border states, Lincoln resisted the demands of radical republicans for complete abolition. Yet some Union generals, such as General B.F.

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    They were seen as illegitimate, imperialistic oppressors of their Muslim neighbours and religious brothers. Finally, while Russia remained neutral in the early stages of the Iran-Iraq War, when it seemed as if Iran would triumph, the Soviet Union began supplying Iraq with military hardware and technological assistance.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Most PLO military officers fled, abandoning their men, who split into small roving guerrilla bands. Moreover, it became clear that the PLO was fighting alone against the Israeli onslaught. The Shia Amal guerrillas had been ordered by their leaders not to fight and to surrender their weapons if necessary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work