• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the Whites lost the Civil War of Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Paper 1: Russia Why the Whites lost the Civil War of Russia Between 1918 and 1920, there was a civil war between the `Red' Russians and the `White' Russians. The Bolsheviks themselves represented the Civil War as a class war, but it was never simply this. The sheer size of Russia often meant that local or regional considerations predominated over larger ideological issues. Introduction According to Wade, the Russian civil war might better be referred to as a series of plural, civil wars, It was in fact a complex, multi- phased event, with overlapping military, economic, national, international and other conflicts. The Bolsheviks saw themselves engaged in an international civil war, a violent international class war, as revolution spread across Europe and then the world. By the beginning of 1920, the Red Army, had for all intents and purposes, won the civil war. Soon most of the territory of Imperial Russia was under Soviet control except for "Poland, Finland and the Baltic states of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania which became independent. In 1921-22 the Red army crushed the last remaining armed forces opposing the communist regime - the peasant armies often called 'Greens' Why the Reds won the Civil War According to Pipes, the victory of the Red Army was a foregone conclusion. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky, the Commissar of War, was chiefly responsible for the successful military operations. He exercised a central command over the whole army, emphasizing discipline and obedience. The commanders of the Red Army were staffed with former Tsarist officers who were willing to co-operate. Officers were punishable by death if they were defeated in a single battle. Fear of death compelled the Red Army to fight bravely. In contrast, the White Army had poor discipline. They were uncoordinated in their war efforts. The White Army took food from the peasants and so did not have economic support from the peasants. The workers rallied behind the Bolsheviks. They peasants did the same because they feared that once the Whites were in power, they would repudiate the Bolsheviks' decree of giving land to them. 1. Disunity of the White armies Pipes: "the critical advantage the Reds enjoyed was that they were one and their enemies many." � The various White armies fought as separate detachments. The White General often acted independently and were thus unable to coordinate his command � They had a common aim: to overthrow the Bolsheviks, that was all. ...read more.

Conclusion

Indeed, by the end of the Civil War whatever initial peasant sympathy they had gained had been lost by the severity of their grain- requisitioning methods. It was that the Whites failed to present themselves as a better alternative � The Whites advocated the return to the pre-revolutionary past � The Reds spread the propaganda that the lands which the peasants seized would be forfeited if the Whites regained power 5. Morale of the army of the Reds and Whites were badly affected by poor leadership and infighting I � Trotsky created an army which proved capable of fighting; they had an unshakeable belief in their own victory � Whites on the other hand, uncoordinated collection of separation forces � The Red Army was the military arm of a civilian government whereas the White armies were a military force that also had to act as a government � The political differences between the uncertain grouping of dispossessed socialists, liberals and moderates made sure that they stayed disunited; in fact led them to bitter disputes � Hence, the Whites deeply divided: those who were fighting for local separatism versus those who wanted a return to strong central government � The Whites lacked leadership. No White leader of the stature of Trotsky or Lenin emerged, around whom an effective anti-Bolshevik army could unite ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    As Commissar for War, Trotsky's active involvement in the Reds' campaigns, travelling in a specially equipped train to the fiercest points to provide support and supplies, enforcing the universal aim, greatly contributed to the performance and determination of the army.

  2. American History.

    by urging the Texans to seize all the land to the Rio Grande. - When Mexico argued about the border, Polk sent troops under General Zachary Taylor ["Old Rough and Ready"] to Rio Grande in 1846. Since he really wanted CA, he tried to buy it as a last resort.

  1. How were the reds able to defeat the whites in the Russian civil war

    They also took all the grain and food the peasants had so they could feed the soldiers and the people in the towns and cities. They even took the grain they had to plant for next yers crops. This caused one of the worst famines ever recorded.

  2. Why did the Reds win the civil war

    The civil war was fought in three main stages. In the first stage resistance to the Bolsheviks was established when anti Bolshevik governments were established around the Don region of Russian which was the location of many tsarist supporters, However during this period fighting was limited as the Red army was not totally established at this point.

  1. Why did the Reds win and the Whites lose the civil war?

    Although the Whites were supplied with help from the Allies this help was insufficient to make a major impact on the war, and was removed early on.

  2. American Civil War (1861-1865).

    Paying a fee or finding a substitute could avoid Service. On April 27, Union General Hooker crossed the Rappahannock River to attack General Lee's forces. Lee split his army, attacking a surprised Union army in three places and almost completely defeated them.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    to allow enough time for their fellow Phalangists to retreated to the stronghold of Dier al Qamar to join the rest of the Christian population there. Some 200 civilians had remained at Bhamdoun believing that they would be unharmed, but they, along with captured Lebanese Forces troops were murdered, many by having their throats cut.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    They were seen as illegitimate, imperialistic oppressors of their Muslim neighbours and religious brothers. Finally, while Russia remained neutral in the early stages of the Iran-Iraq War, when it seemed as if Iran would triumph, the Soviet Union began supplying Iraq with military hardware and technological assistance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work