• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the Whites lost the Civil War of Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Paper 1: Russia Why the Whites lost the Civil War of Russia Between 1918 and 1920, there was a civil war between the `Red' Russians and the `White' Russians. The Bolsheviks themselves represented the Civil War as a class war, but it was never simply this. The sheer size of Russia often meant that local or regional considerations predominated over larger ideological issues. Introduction According to Wade, the Russian civil war might better be referred to as a series of plural, civil wars, It was in fact a complex, multi- phased event, with overlapping military, economic, national, international and other conflicts. The Bolsheviks saw themselves engaged in an international civil war, a violent international class war, as revolution spread across Europe and then the world. By the beginning of 1920, the Red Army, had for all intents and purposes, won the civil war. Soon most of the territory of Imperial Russia was under Soviet control except for "Poland, Finland and the Baltic states of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania which became independent. In 1921-22 the Red army crushed the last remaining armed forces opposing the communist regime - the peasant armies often called 'Greens' Why the Reds won the Civil War According to Pipes, the victory of the Red Army was a foregone conclusion. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky, the Commissar of War, was chiefly responsible for the successful military operations. He exercised a central command over the whole army, emphasizing discipline and obedience. The commanders of the Red Army were staffed with former Tsarist officers who were willing to co-operate. Officers were punishable by death if they were defeated in a single battle. Fear of death compelled the Red Army to fight bravely. In contrast, the White Army had poor discipline. They were uncoordinated in their war efforts. The White Army took food from the peasants and so did not have economic support from the peasants. The workers rallied behind the Bolsheviks. They peasants did the same because they feared that once the Whites were in power, they would repudiate the Bolsheviks' decree of giving land to them. 1. Disunity of the White armies Pipes: "the critical advantage the Reds enjoyed was that they were one and their enemies many." � The various White armies fought as separate detachments. The White General often acted independently and were thus unable to coordinate his command � They had a common aim: to overthrow the Bolsheviks, that was all. ...read more.

Conclusion

Indeed, by the end of the Civil War whatever initial peasant sympathy they had gained had been lost by the severity of their grain- requisitioning methods. It was that the Whites failed to present themselves as a better alternative � The Whites advocated the return to the pre-revolutionary past � The Reds spread the propaganda that the lands which the peasants seized would be forfeited if the Whites regained power 5. Morale of the army of the Reds and Whites were badly affected by poor leadership and infighting I � Trotsky created an army which proved capable of fighting; they had an unshakeable belief in their own victory � Whites on the other hand, uncoordinated collection of separation forces � The Red Army was the military arm of a civilian government whereas the White armies were a military force that also had to act as a government � The political differences between the uncertain grouping of dispossessed socialists, liberals and moderates made sure that they stayed disunited; in fact led them to bitter disputes � Hence, the Whites deeply divided: those who were fighting for local separatism versus those who wanted a return to strong central government � The Whites lacked leadership. No White leader of the stature of Trotsky or Lenin emerged, around whom an effective anti-Bolshevik army could unite ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the Reds win the civil war

    The civil war was fought in three main stages. In the first stage resistance to the Bolsheviks was established when anti Bolshevik governments were established around the Don region of Russian which was the location of many tsarist supporters, However during this period fighting was limited as the Red army was not totally established at this point.

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    Furthermore, the Whites did not only lack numbers but were scattered around the edges of the central area of Russia, separated by large distances. This made communications difficult, especially moving men and weapons, coordinating the attacks of different White armies and even conscripting men as the areas were not as populated as the central, Red held ones.

  1. How were the reds able to defeat the whites in the Russian civil war

    They also took all the grain and food the peasants had so they could feed the soldiers and the people in the towns and cities. They even took the grain they had to plant for next yers crops. This caused one of the worst famines ever recorded.

  2. American Civil War (1861-1865).

    On July 1, a chance encounter between Union and Confederate forces began the Battle of Gettysburg. In the fighting that followed, Meade had greater numbers and better defensive positions. He won the battle, but failed to follow Lee as he retreated back to Virginia.

  1. Why did the Reds win and the Whites lose the civil war?

    were the best guarantors of the peoples hopes as promised at the time of the revolution. The lack of unity and co-operation between the different White Generals led to a weakness that was apparent from the beginning of the war.

  2. How far do you agree with the proposition that the outcome of the civil ...

    Furthermore its population was ethnically homogenous containing mostly Great Russians. Control of the heartland of Russia gave the Reds other advantages such as control of the existing communications networks and strategic depth so when under attack on one front they could safely give ground until troops were transferred from other

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    for non-intervention as well. But overall, the general feeling in Iran was that the Soviets had cooperated with the Shah and provided little support for the revolution. Secondly, Iran repeatedly condemned the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan throughout the first decade of the Islamic Republic.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Large street battles also took place around the Murr tower where the Syrians had been dug in. In pitting his meagre force of a few thousand fighters against three divisions of the Syrian Army, Gemayel was taking a calculated gamble that Israel would come to his rescue and evict the Syrians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work