• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Harry and Ivans criminal liability for the death of Jayne

Extracts from this document...


Harry and Ivan case Discuss Harry and Ivan's criminal liability for the death of Jayne Harry and Ivan would be charged with a count of murder; however, as it is clear that there is no mens rea and intent for murder present, this will be substituted for manslaughter. With no mens rea it is clear that it is not voluntary manslaughter, this leaves involuntary manslaughter for the courts to consider, either unlawful act or gross negligence manslaughter. Harry's liability has to be taken into account; gross negligence and unlawful act manslaughter need to be considered. By all means, the supply of drugs to Jayne from Harry is an unlawful act. This must be considered to be an act that all sober and reasonable people would realise there is a risk of harm. The reasonable man would realise that there would be the risk of some harm to Jayne as she was a first time user. The act must also cause the death. Kennedy (2007) ...read more.


As with Ivan, this act must be proved to be the substantial cause and of a gross nature. When Harry left, Ivan was still conscious and drug free so it could be argued that if Jayne got worse, Ivan should deal with it, opted to it being Harry's responsibility. If this was the case, then this would also negate the 'gross' nature of the negligence leaving Harry not guilty of gross negligence manslaughter. When considering Ivan's liability, gross negligence manslaughter must be considered, it should be established whether or not he owed a duty of care to Jayne as a result of their relationship. In Stone and Dobinson, a relationship can be sufficient evidence for there being a duty of care owed, however as Ivan and Jayne share neither blood nor legal relationship, it may be taken this is not sufficient for a duty of care to be owed. Providing a duty of care has been established, Ivan coule be convicted of gross negligence manslaughter. ...read more.


However, was it dangerous enough to cause Jayne's death? In Rogers (2003) the Court of Appeal ruled that by helping another inject you became part of the mechanics of taking the drugs, thus if death occurred as a result, the defendant may be guilty of manslaughter. Although, the House of Lords ruled this to be incorrect, by providing a tourniquet you are not administering the noxious substance so these two acts cannot be regarded as being in cycle. If the House of Lords is to be taken as precedent, Ivan faces no charge of unlawful act manslaughter. Both Harry and Ivan cannot be charged of unlawful act manslaughter; however there are some valid points of gross negligence manslaughter against both of them. Both owed a duty of care to Jayne - the fact that Ivan was present throughout and was aware of Jaynes condition getting worse, he still ignored it and took drugs himself, he is more likely to get convicted. However on the other hand, there is a strong case for Harry to be convicted as he vacated the flat completely. ?? ?? ?? ?? Law Sam Wong ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Custodial Care

    However with all the programmes that the prison service offers to the prisoners, the current reoffending rate is very high. This shows that the rehabilitation programmes aren't working as they should. I think in order for the prison services rehabilitation programmes to work they would need to improve the quality of the programmes.

  2. Sanctions available in criminal Law

    offender must serve, a offender serving a life sentence will be given a date which they could be considered for release. In some very serious cases, a court may impose a full life sentence with no option of release. However there are critics who suggest this sanction is not as effective as it sets out to be.


    These kinds of people need to be included in the events, which happen so that they also participate. In as much as anyone have the rights in life people with learning disabilities have the rights to choose what they want be it a sample thing like choosing what they want

  2. Assess the likelihood of Sid and Kenny avoiding personal liability for the debts of ...

    In the light of this scenario, the issue is that Sid and Kenny have set up a company called "Justincase Ltd" and sell most of the assets of "Flash Ltd" in case the company become insolvent after receiving a hefty fine.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work