• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what is meant by the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy and briefly explain one limitation on this doctrine.

Extracts from this document...


2a. Explain what is meant by the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy and briefly explain one limitation on this doctrine. The Parliament is the supreme law maker in the UK however there are limitations to the Parliaments power. The supremacy or sovereignty of Parliament was set up in the 17th century. The Bill of Rights was passed in 1689 which stated that Parliament was the supreme law maker. Parliamentary supremacy meant that the parliament could make or repeal any laws and could not be challenged in the courts. In our structure of government the Parliament is our highest law source in the UK and claims superiority over common case law, delegated legislation and previous Acts. ...read more.


means that the power of a Parliamentary law cannot be queried by anybody including the church, the king or queen or the courts. One parliament cannot limit the law making ability of future Parliaments therefore it is unattainable for Parliament to pass a permanent law. There are however limitations to the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy one of which is the Humans Rights Act. Before the establishment of the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998, the UK's general public was protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) 1950. The Human Rights Act 1998 was enacted in October 2008 and included the ECHR into domestic law. ...read more.


The Act doesn't give the Convention dominance over English law however it does call for legislation being compatible with the guidelines of the Convention where possible. It doesn't give the courts power to overrule bills that don't fit the principles however it doesn't prevent Parliament establishing laws that disagree with the Act. There is a statement in the Act that allows the Government Minister to change any act that is incompatible with the HRA. Therefore parliamentary supremacy remains. Parliamentary supremacy is not completely affected by the Humans Right Act. Government Ministers must state whether the new legislation is compatible with the HRA but no explanation is needed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    the community and that everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law (United Nations, 1998). To draw the specific attention to the women's rights context, we may quote the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which implies the equality both women and men'

  2. Our country's goodPlotAct one scene one-In scene one we see that there are some ...

    Tech and Ross are against the idea, we see the hate Ross has for the convicts in this scene when he talks about them being treated like animals and how they should be treated no better than slaves. At the end of the play the men have decided the play

  1. Are the Human Rights Act 1998 and the doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy compatible?

    However, it was ruled that if the only obstacle between carrying out Community law (which would grant the required relief) was a rule of domestic, national law then that rule should be set aside in order that the Community law be followed.

  2. How democratic was the British parliamentary system by 1914.

    Many people were pressured or threatened to vote for their MP and so the next two acts passed were more to do with corruption rather than democracy. The Ballot Act 1872 and The Corrupt & Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883 although didn't cut down corruption overnight it reduced the influence

  1. Parliamentary supremacy

    The powers that are delegated through devolution are limited and remain under the overall control of Westminster Parliament. Perhaps the most influential development in a loss of national sovereignty and a fragmentation of Parliamentary supremacy has been the UK's Membership in 1973 to the European Union.

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    The Act has been applauded as a much overdue constitutional innovation (Greer, 1999) but its impact falls short of triggering a constitutional revolution in the sense of placing judicially enforceable 'higher law' constraints on Parliament's legislative power (Loveland, 2003). The statement in discussion expresses that in practice the effect of

  1. The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey

    Under the terms of the 1972 Act it was always been clear that it was the duty of a United Kingdom court, when delivering final judgement, to override any rule of community law. Similarly, when decisions of the Court of Justice have exposed areas of United Kingdom statute law which

  2. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    By the Doctrine of implied repeal, the later Act repeals the earlier Act to the extent that the later Act is inconsistent with provisions in the earlier Act.13 As long as United Kingdom remains a member of the European Union, the Parliamentary authority will be limited by the Community law

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work