• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Expressed Terms

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Barry Problem This problem is related to express terms. These are terms which the parties write down or agree to orally. The terms within a contract have been sub-divided into conditions which is a major term and warranties which are a minor term. Conditions are vital terms of the contract which, if broken, entitles the injured party to repudiate the contract. It was defined by Lord Justice Fletcher Moulton in Wallis v Pratt as 'An obligation which goes directly to the substance of the contract that its non-performance may fairly be considered by the other party as a substantial failure to perform the contract at all'. Warranties are a subsidiary term of the contract and give rise to an action in damages only. It was defined in Wallis v Pratt as 'An obligation which, though it must be performed, does not go to the root of the contract.' Whether a term is a condition or a warranty is a question of the intention of the parties to be deduced from the circumstances of the cases. ...read more.

Middle

The plaintiff became seriously ill five days before the first performance and it was uncertain as to how long her illness would last. The defendant found a replacement and refused to take the plaintiff back when she was better after eleven days. It was held that the defendant was entitled to treat the contract as discharged by the plaintiff's breach. The term, 'the machine only requires two star petrol to operate it', is a warranty, as it does not go to the root of the problem, as it is not as important for the machine to use two star rather than four star and there is no need to end the contract. Under this breach Barry is entitled to sue for damages. In Bettini v Gye a singer missed three days of rehearsals due to being ill, the defendant terminated the contract. It was held that the plaintiff could still perform his contract and the defendant was not entitled to treat the contract as discharged by the plaintiff's late arrival for rehearsals. ...read more.

Conclusion

Ltd v Kawasaki Ltd, where it was held that the take of the court was not to evaluate the term as is stood in the contract, but to wait and see what happened as a result of the breach. Due to the late delivery of the machine, it does not necessarily inconvenience Barry and does not go to the root of the problem so it may just be a warranty. Similar cases to Barry's is Mihalis Angelos and Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export S.A., in both of these cases, it involves the issue of time, in both it was decided that the innominate term can not be used when a time is stipulated in a contract, meaning that this term must be a condition which has been breached by the late delivery of the machine and Barry is therefore entitled to repudiate the contract and sue for damages. Therefore overall, Barry is entitled to repudiate the contract and sue for damages due to Wobbly Ltd breaching two conditions and a warranty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    Therefore, judgment was entered for the buyers. * The above case is concerning about the affect on the agreement upon submission of a document containing terms before the alleged contract is made, however if the situation is another way round, the contract will not be effected20 unless they are in

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    After some portions of the work had been finished the premises, with all the materials thereon, were destroyed by an accidental fire. Chandler v Webster [1904] 1 KB 493. The defendant agreed to let a room, for the purpose of viewing the coronation procession, for �141.

  1. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    Any unilateral variation of the written statement of terms and conditions will be subject to implied terms where necessary thereby nailing the coffin in the nineteenth century imagery of a master-servant relationship39. Ho w, if at all, do the terms generally implied into the contract of employment cause it to differ from other forms of contractual arrangement?

  2. Invitation To Treat

    In this case, John who executes the will is called the testator, and has the major and sound mind to make the decision. John' sister and his brother-in-law are the beneficiaries for this case. Under the Wills Act, they are called the legatees who can be relations or even strangers.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    In Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1893 it was sufficient for the claimant to act on the offer with out acceptance of it first. Prescribed mode of communication The offeror may call for acceptance by specified means. But if the offeror stipulates that this is the only method of

  2. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    and franchise agreements * Agreements between trade associations and their members But also anti competitive agreements may well breach the provisions of the competitions act 1998, and the EU competition policy articles 81 & 82 of the treaty of Rome.

  1. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    held that even though the defendant's assurances did not amount to n express warranty as to the horse's fitness for stud, nevertheless they were an implied warranty to that effect. This case appears to work fairly as if something is recommended by the seller for a particular purpose; it can

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206. "Prima facie that which in any contract is left to be implied and need not be expressed is something so obvious that it goes without saying so that if while the parties were making their bargain an officious bystander were to suggest

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work