• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

Extracts from this document...


' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?' The history of jury trial dates back many centuries in which time the role and status of jury members have changed considerably as have the number and range of cases tried by the jury system. A major milestone in the history of juries was in Bushell's Case (1670), that established that the juries were the sole judges of fact, with the right to give a verdict according to conscience. They could not be penalized for taking a view of the facts opposed to that of the judge. The importance of this power today is that juries may acquit a defendant, even when the law demands a guilty verdict. In contemporary society, the jury is considered a fundamental part of the English legal system, and it occupies an almost sacred place in the public's imagination. It has been referred to as the " lamp that shows freedom lives" by Lord Devlin and Jack Straw (former Home Secretary) said that it is a " key freedom in our democracy". Despite its historical role and the sentimental attachments, the jury system has come under increasing attack in recent years. It is a political issue about which there is much excited, and lamentably cliched debate. ...read more.


The view that randomly chosen members of the public are the best judges of the facts may vary on the nature of the offence. In serious fraud trials it may be argued that analytical skills are relatively more important than in most other trials and that the average juror's ability to assess credibility and honesty in the complicated world of commercial transactions is reduced. Although willing to perform their ' civic duty', some may lack the education that would enable them to follow a complicated argument or form a coherent opinion. These jurors may simply follow the majority when it comes time to vote on a verdict. A succession of high profile criminal trials in recent years has served to highlight the continuing difficulties, which appear to be created by trial by jury in large and complex cases. In addition, when these cases have produced a conviction, the outcome has on occasion been quashed on appeal either because it is unmanageable or there is a significant risk of miscarriage of justice. In R v. Jones, the trial judge discharged the jury from returning verdicts once the prosecution case had been presented on the grounds that the jury would not be able to recall the vital features of the evidence by the time they would be asked to refine. ...read more.


(The Times, Nov. 20th 1978). It appears that the jury has maintained its importance in contemporary society. It is a vital instrument in the maintenance of our democracy. Public involvement in the justice system provides openness and it enriches our community. The issue of complex cases does however call into question its abilities and its importance. A solution to this problem however could be to have a separate decision making body for cases considered to be complex. There are constructive reforms that fall way short of restriction of the right to trial by jury e.g. October progress report expressed proposals to improve representation on jurors by making it more difficult for potential jurors to be excused. All in all, it appears that the jury system is a key figure in our society. Perhaps a fundamental overhaul of the jury system with regards people escaping duty and to ensure that they are more representatives of the population would not be out of the question. Independence! Openness! Public Involvement! How important are these features of jury trial considered to be in our criminal justice system? Either we want a democratic element maintained in our system or we don't. Either we trust the judgement of twelve ordinary citizens or we don't. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    This can be seen as a benefit, but it can also be called part of the downfall of trial by jury in that, putting twelve people with no training or experience in criminal justice matters into a jury box might be expecting too much of some people, as they are

  2. Woolf Reforms

    Zander criticised this analysis, pointing out that it is only supported by 'unsubstantiated opinion' rather than real evidence, despite the fact that it forms the basis for most of the subsequent proposals. By contrast, Zander has drawn attention to research carried out for the Lord Chancellor's Department in 1994 into the causes of delay.

  1. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    No court may accept a majority verdict unless the jury has had a reasonable period for deliberation. Accordingly, the Crown Court may not accept a verdict unless the jury has had at least two hours for deliberation.18 A jury's verdict must be given in open court in the presence of all jurors and preferably in the presence of the defendant.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    to select anyone who is qualified to be juror from people passing by in the street or from local offices or businesses. The prosecution may challenge the jury by special right of 'stand in' these are for cause, prosecution right to stand by jurors and to the array of section

  1. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    The arrest did not occur until 25 years later and based on the lapse of time, the jury acquitted them. Another argument raised up by the critics is the secrecy of decision. This was supported by s.8 of Contempt Court Act 1981, where it will be contempt to court if

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o Remember anyone warned must be referred to YOT. 5 Mentally Ill offenders o Law says mentally ill not punished but treated, as far as possible. o Courts can issue all four above + extras. o Such as placing them on probation as long as they attends for treatment, makes hospital order or makes restrictions orders under sec 41 of the Mental Health act 1983.

  1. Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown ...

    Whilst the barrister and the judge are discussing points of law the jury are dismissed so don't have to spend all their time in the Court room. Once the case has finished, the jury are sent to a private room in the chambers of the Court where the group elects a foreman.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The evidence must be sufficiently reliable so that it can be used to make important decisions in cases. Although the expert may be highly reliable the evidence which they provide may not be, which clearly highlights the problems which can occur regardless whether the test for suitability is objective or subjective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work