• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

Extracts from this document...


' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?' The history of jury trial dates back many centuries in which time the role and status of jury members have changed considerably as have the number and range of cases tried by the jury system. A major milestone in the history of juries was in Bushell's Case (1670), that established that the juries were the sole judges of fact, with the right to give a verdict according to conscience. They could not be penalized for taking a view of the facts opposed to that of the judge. The importance of this power today is that juries may acquit a defendant, even when the law demands a guilty verdict. In contemporary society, the jury is considered a fundamental part of the English legal system, and it occupies an almost sacred place in the public's imagination. It has been referred to as the " lamp that shows freedom lives" by Lord Devlin and Jack Straw (former Home Secretary) said that it is a " key freedom in our democracy". Despite its historical role and the sentimental attachments, the jury system has come under increasing attack in recent years. It is a political issue about which there is much excited, and lamentably cliched debate. ...read more.


The view that randomly chosen members of the public are the best judges of the facts may vary on the nature of the offence. In serious fraud trials it may be argued that analytical skills are relatively more important than in most other trials and that the average juror's ability to assess credibility and honesty in the complicated world of commercial transactions is reduced. Although willing to perform their ' civic duty', some may lack the education that would enable them to follow a complicated argument or form a coherent opinion. These jurors may simply follow the majority when it comes time to vote on a verdict. A succession of high profile criminal trials in recent years has served to highlight the continuing difficulties, which appear to be created by trial by jury in large and complex cases. In addition, when these cases have produced a conviction, the outcome has on occasion been quashed on appeal either because it is unmanageable or there is a significant risk of miscarriage of justice. In R v. Jones, the trial judge discharged the jury from returning verdicts once the prosecution case had been presented on the grounds that the jury would not be able to recall the vital features of the evidence by the time they would be asked to refine. ...read more.


(The Times, Nov. 20th 1978). It appears that the jury has maintained its importance in contemporary society. It is a vital instrument in the maintenance of our democracy. Public involvement in the justice system provides openness and it enriches our community. The issue of complex cases does however call into question its abilities and its importance. A solution to this problem however could be to have a separate decision making body for cases considered to be complex. There are constructive reforms that fall way short of restriction of the right to trial by jury e.g. October progress report expressed proposals to improve representation on jurors by making it more difficult for potential jurors to be excused. All in all, it appears that the jury system is a key figure in our society. Perhaps a fundamental overhaul of the jury system with regards people escaping duty and to ensure that they are more representatives of the population would not be out of the question. Independence! Openness! Public Involvement! How important are these features of jury trial considered to be in our criminal justice system? Either we want a democratic element maintained in our system or we don't. Either we trust the judgement of twelve ordinary citizens or we don't. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    asked to leave all their experiences outside the courtroom (Sanders & Young, 2000:551). There are many argument against juries - poor representation of gender, race and class, lack of skill in dealing with complex cases, their subjective opinions, the cost of the trials and their apparent tendency to be swayed

  2. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    The arrest did not occur until 25 years later and based on the lapse of time, the jury acquitted them. Another argument raised up by the critics is the secrecy of decision. This was supported by s.8 of Contempt Court Act 1981, where it will be contempt to court if

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    This is the kind of power the court holds. If the court had simply decided on a moral issue and come down one way or the other in Roe then I think the argument could be made that the Court has to govern represents a rather blunt instrument of public policy.

  2. Woolf Reforms

    The small claims track deals with actions with a value of less than �5,000, the fast-track deals with actions of a value between �5,000 and �15,000 and the multi-track deals with actions with a value higher than �15,000. The small claims track is a procedure used by county courts to deal with relatively small claims.

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    5 of the Juries Act 1974 to challenge to the whole jury on the basis that it has been chosen in an unrepresentative or biased way. For example In 1987 R v Fraser the defendant was of an ethnic minority background, but all the jurors were white.

  2. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    Minimum Sentence o The Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 introduced automatic life for 2nd violent/sexual conviction for 18+. o Judge still can decide on min time before considered, + not give life if exceptional o Min sentence for 18+ 3x dealing class A of 7yrs. o Min sentence for 18+ 3x robbery residential 3yrs.

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    to 'protect the public', a rehabilitative plan developed by the community'.40 The fine balance between restorative justice and the sentencing provisions in the Criminal Code of Canada represents the essence of an accommodative strategy such as the sentencing circles of aboriginal offenders.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    if it appears to the court that, having regard to all the circumstances, including the circumstances in which the evidence was obtained, the admission of the evidence would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit it.? The clear and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work