• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law - Discribe the British Jury System.

Extracts from this document...


To be eligible for jury service a person must be aged between 18/70 and be registered to vote on the electoral register as se out in the juries Act 1974, as amended by Criminal Justice Act of 1988. However some people, who qualify under the criteria above, are still not allowed to serve on a jury, because they are disqualified or ineligible for some other reason. Some criminal convictions will disqualify you from serving on a jury, the length of time of disqualification depending on the sentence given. In addition, the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 has disqualified those on bail from sitting as jurors. People suffering from certain mental illness people whose occupations are concerned with the administration of justice or who have been so employed within the last 10 years; this is a wide group as it includes judges, court clerks, Barristers, solicitors and polices, priest, monks and nuns as they could have a biased view. Apart from these group there are also people who have the right to refuse to do jury service; they are 'excusable as of right' this group includes: Members of Parliament, those serving in the armed forces, doctors, nurses and pharmacist anyone aged 65 to 70, anyone who has done jury service within the last years. ...read more.


During the trial jurors may make notes of any points they wish to be given clips of any documentary evidence of photographs, the judge decides any necessary points of law during the trial and at the end of the trial he explains any legal matters, that the jury need to know to reach their verdict. Formerly the verdict of a jury had to be unanimous, but now the criminal justice act of 1967, provides that a majority verdict may be allowed. The court cannot, however accept a majority verdict unless the jury has been deliberating for no less than two hours, when the verdict need not then be unanimous if: A) In a case where there are not less than eleven jurors, ten of them agree; or B) In a case where there are ten jurors, nine of them agree. It must be stated in open court as to the number of jurors who respectively agreed to and dissented from the verdict, some times when juries go out or are deliberating; they can some times which is where a member of a jury, for a case could be bribed or threatened. When in a case where a juror dies or is ill, provided that both sides agree and the number of jurors is not reduced below ten, the case may continue and a verdict maybe given. ...read more.


Young people and those from ethnic minorities are less likely than other groups to register to vote. The ranchmen commission 1993 on the criminal Justice System proposed that in some cases if random selection does not produce a multiracial jury, then such a jury should be deliberately chosen. Another case of under-representation is the number of discretionary excusals allowed in the London it is said that as many as a third of all those summonsed to do jury service may be excused. This affects some types of people more than others, when mothers with young children as it has a jury and he was found not guilty. The disadvantages could be that: The minimum age of 18 could or maybe too inexperienced for jury service, or educational test for their task, and maybe too easily impressed and swayed by advocacy of experienced counsel. Local prejudice may exist in certain trials, and this may be reflected in local jurors; corrupt influences, threats and intimidation from outside parties, some trials are long and may cause inconvenience to jurors, who may suffer financially and the cost to the state will also be high. The media can also play a major role in the disadvantage of the jury service, the Bruce Grobellaar case he was charged of match fixing, so he went to a civil court but there was a burden of proof in the case, the level of proof established in the case was beyond reasonable d ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    It is a respected mode of trial which as we have seen, has been around for centuries. The use of juries allows the British public a hand in the criminal justice system, which many of them may never otherwise have any experience of.

  2. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    his attendance deferred if he can show good reason to the satisfaction of the summoning officer11 or they may appeal the decision if they are refused.12 Conversely, a judge can discharge a juror if in his or her opinion, the

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    He also did not try to win the case by bringing his family into court, to appeal to the emotional side of the jury. Therefore he did not want to win the case on this argument. Even though there was much dislike of Socrates, already positioned in the minds of

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    In the case of Cabballero v UK (2000), Caballero challenged s.25 by going to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The ECHR said s.25 was a breach of the right to a fair trial. So s.56 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 amended s.25 and said that bail

  1. Description of the jury system

    Although jury service is mandatory, there are few groups of people who are entitled to be excused. Also governed under section 1 of the Juries Act 1974 as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988, people between the ages of 65 and 69 may be excused as they may suffer from lack of concentration.

  2. Criminal investigations and the criminal justice system

    With PACE orders like the detection and charging, prior to PACE, stop and search powers valid and procedures differed between forces and were unclear. PACE introduced a general power to stop and search persons or vehicles for stolen or prohibited articles, if officers had reasonable suspicion that they might be present.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    brings forward suggestions for how the law could be reformed to help resolve these issues. The fact that the Law Commission has felt the need to create this report shows just how many issues there currently are. They suggest four possible ways of resolving the issue of determining whether evidence provided in court is sufficiently reliable.

  2. The English Court System

    The clients can only claim £5,000 for claims that don’t involve personal injuries and up to £1,000 for reimbursement that involve personal injuries. In addition, the claim has to be adjudicated by a judge in the court and court fees can be recovered.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work