• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12

Am going to use numerical methods to solve equations that can't be solved algebraically

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Greig Boyd

C3 Coursework

Solution of equations by numerical methods

Introduction

In this coursework I am going to use numerical methods to solve equations that can’t be solved algebraically, for example if the largest power of the equation was 3 or over , we would have to use the following methods: the change in sign method, Newton-Raphson method and the method of rearranging f(x) =0 in the form x = g(x).

I am going to use an equation which cannot be factorised or solved using the formula x = -b image00.png .

                    2a

Change of sign method

My equation is -6x3 +9x2 +5x-6.

image01.png

 My equation has four roots I am going to use change of sign to find one of them. For the change in sign method I am going to do a decimal search, i.e. I have taken the negative and positive y values that are in between zero. I did my first decimal search to two decimal places and carried on the same procedure all the way up to four decimal places.

x

Y

0

-6

0.1

-5.416

0.2

-4.688

0.3

-3.852

0.4

-2.944

0.5

-2

0.6

-1.056

0.7

-0.148

0.8

0.688

0.9

1.416

1

2

The first thing I did was find out were the formula crosses the x-axis, which was 0.7 and 0.8.

...read more.

Middle

Thus proves that the root lies no greater nor less than 0.00005 away from 0.717. It also shows it’s correct by the change in sign.

image02.png

Failure of “change of sign”

Failure will occur if:

  • The curve touches the x-axis.
  • There are several roots close together
  • There is a discontinuity in f(x)

I am going to use decimal search to find the roots of another equation

-2x2-3x-1.12

I cannot use decimal search for this equation as it doesn’t cross the x-axis.

There are some cases where the roots cannot always be found. Reasons for this could be if the roots are too close together

image03.png

Newton-Raphson method

X5-6x +2

The Newton raphson method is a fixed point estimation method. It is important to use an estimation of the root as a starting point.

I will give an estimation (x0) for a root of f(x) =0 I will then draw a tangent to the curve y=f(x) at the point (x0, f(x)). The point where the tangent cuts the x-axis gives a closer approximation for the root, and then the process is repeated

image04.png

From this it is clear that D is a better estimation than B. We can continue this to get closer to A.

...read more.

Conclusion

3 of decimal search I got 1.4675+ 0.0005. For Newton Raphson I got at x3 1.474406026 and for the rearrangement I got x3 1.496651121. Although Newton Raphson and the rearrangement were more accurate as it is to more decimal places. Even though the decimal search method was the most efficient it took longer to do.

Comparing methods in terms of ease of use with hardware and software

With all three methods I used a graphical calculator as my hardware. With the decimal search method I only had to be aware of where the roots lie in the intervals to be able to use the method. With Newton-Raphson method I just had to be able to check on the graphics calculator what the roots were to know whether it was converging towards the root or diverging from the root. This made me use the arrow buttons to move the curser to where the roots lie. On the contrary, with rearranging I had to plot the y=x and the function on the same graph and for this I had to use Microsoft excel. In conclusion in terms of ease of use with involved hardware and software; the decimal search was the most efficient method to use, then Newton- Raphson and the most involved one was the rearranging method.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. Decimal Search method This method is by far the easiest and requires least amount of mathematical skill as it

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    It is clear enough that this works for all the values of n previously proven, but now I will attempt to try and prove this for fractional and negative powers to prove that this formula is correct. If there is irrefutable evidence to support this gradient function for xn, I will investigate different values of "a" in axn-1.

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    = positive, hence the false position method will work. However to carry out multiple iterations I will have to create a spreadsheet, which can be done for the false position method. So therefore it is a suitable method for the equation.

  2. Mathematical equations can be solved in many ways; however some equations cannot be solved ...

    This resulting staircase approaches the root, which lies at the intersection of the line and the curve. At the root, the curve has a positive gradient as it is sloping upwards. Also, it is shallower than y=x. Therefore, at the root, 0<g'(x)

  1. This coursework is about finding the roots of equations by numerical methods.

    Newton Raphson converges to a value near to -0.6180 The Newton Raphson does NOT automatically trap the root between two values In our example it looks like the root is just below 1.618034. We proposed it was 1.6180 to 5sf We need to use the change of sign method to trap the root between two solution bounds We evaluate f(1.61805)

  2. Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

    Close roots In some cubic function there are 2 close roots and this method will also fail in this situation. Our target root is between 0 and 1 and if we use 0 and 1 as the upper and lower bound then we will find another root instead of our target root.

  1. Numerical solution of equations, Interval bisection---change of sign methods, Fixed point iteration ---the Newton-Raphson ...

    This tell us the magnitude of the gradient of g(x) at the point of x = 0.093078 is less than 1, (<1) that means that the slope of it is less than that of the line y = x. Failure of the method x=(x�+8)/13 n x 1 4 2 5.53846154

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    method and the slowest is change of signs method. Relative merits of the three methods with available hardware and software If you only had a scientific calculator During the ways finding the roots, we know that by using scientific calculator, we are able to look for the roots by all methods.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work