• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Am going to use numerical methods to solve equations that can't be solved algebraically

Extracts from this document...


Greig Boyd

C3 Coursework

Solution of equations by numerical methods


In this coursework I am going to use numerical methods to solve equations that can’t be solved algebraically, for example if the largest power of the equation was 3 or over , we would have to use the following methods: the change in sign method, Newton-Raphson method and the method of rearranging f(x) =0 in the form x = g(x).

I am going to use an equation which cannot be factorised or solved using the formula x = -b image00.png .


Change of sign method

My equation is -6x3 +9x2 +5x-6.


 My equation has four roots I am going to use change of sign to find one of them. For the change in sign method I am going to do a decimal search, i.e. I have taken the negative and positive y values that are in between zero. I did my first decimal search to two decimal places and carried on the same procedure all the way up to four decimal places.

























The first thing I did was find out were the formula crosses the x-axis, which was 0.7 and 0.8.

...read more.


Thus proves that the root lies no greater nor less than 0.00005 away from 0.717. It also shows it’s correct by the change in sign.


Failure of “change of sign”

Failure will occur if:

  • The curve touches the x-axis.
  • There are several roots close together
  • There is a discontinuity in f(x)

I am going to use decimal search to find the roots of another equation


I cannot use decimal search for this equation as it doesn’t cross the x-axis.

There are some cases where the roots cannot always be found. Reasons for this could be if the roots are too close together


Newton-Raphson method

X5-6x +2

The Newton raphson method is a fixed point estimation method. It is important to use an estimation of the root as a starting point.

I will give an estimation (x0) for a root of f(x) =0 I will then draw a tangent to the curve y=f(x) at the point (x0, f(x)). The point where the tangent cuts the x-axis gives a closer approximation for the root, and then the process is repeated


From this it is clear that D is a better estimation than B. We can continue this to get closer to A.

...read more.


3 of decimal search I got 1.4675+ 0.0005. For Newton Raphson I got at x3 1.474406026 and for the rearrangement I got x3 1.496651121. Although Newton Raphson and the rearrangement were more accurate as it is to more decimal places. Even though the decimal search method was the most efficient it took longer to do.

Comparing methods in terms of ease of use with hardware and software

With all three methods I used a graphical calculator as my hardware. With the decimal search method I only had to be aware of where the roots lie in the intervals to be able to use the method. With Newton-Raphson method I just had to be able to check on the graphics calculator what the roots were to know whether it was converging towards the root or diverging from the root. This made me use the arrow buttons to move the curser to where the roots lie. On the contrary, with rearranging I had to plot the y=x and the function on the same graph and for this I had to use Microsoft excel. In conclusion in terms of ease of use with involved hardware and software; the decimal search was the most efficient method to use, then Newton- Raphson and the most involved one was the rearranging method.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. Decimal Search method This method is by far the easiest and requires least amount of mathematical skill as it

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    It is clear enough that this works for all the values of n previously proven, but now I will attempt to try and prove this for fractional and negative powers to prove that this formula is correct. If there is irrefutable evidence to support this gradient function for xn, I will investigate different values of "a" in axn-1.

  1. Best shape for gutter and further alegbra - using Excel to solve some mathematical ...

    change according to the intentions of the designer, and so give high value feedback or other information, to the user" Using a spreadsheet in question 2 allows interactivity. Linked values are a defining feature of the spreadsheet. This capability to link and respond enables the spreadsheet to offer interactivity (Mathematical Association, 2002, p39).

  2. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    The values of M up to M64 are exact values obtained from using the mid-point rule. However, it becomes tedious and time-consuming to carry this any further than M64. In order to work out M128 we have to use extrapolated values.

  1. Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

    It has found the 2nd root to be 0.1683 3rd Root - My first estimate will be 2. n Xn 1 2 2 1.722 3 1.647 4 1.642 5 1.642 This is the tangent that is drawn when using this method.

  2. The method I am going to use to solve x−3x-1=0 is the Change ...

    �)] = -1.380277569 x8 = x7 - [(x7 ^4+x7 �-1=0)/( 4x7 �+3x7 �)] = -1.380277569 I can see some convergence from x6. There has been no change in the x-values between x7 and x8 for this number of decimal place.

  1. C3 Mei - Numerical Methods to solve equations

    is not close to 0. Newton - Raphson Method I will find the root of the following function using the Newton-Raphson method. The following diagram shows the Newton-Raphson method being used in order to find the three roots of the equation.

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    method and the slowest is change of signs method. Relative merits of the three methods with available hardware and software If you only had a scientific calculator During the ways finding the roots, we know that by using scientific calculator, we are able to look for the roots by all methods.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work