• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparative stem and leaf diagram of error lines

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparative stem and leaf diagram of error lines

Key: 0  4=0.4 cm

Year 7: 0.4, 0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 1.4

Year 11: 0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 0.9, 1.6

Year7                                                                              

Mode: 0.6 cm

Median: 0.6 cm

Lower quartile: 0.5 cm

Upper quartile: 0.75 cm

Interquartile range: 0.75-0.5=0.25 cm

Semi-interquartile range: 0.25÷2=0.125 cm

Year 11

Mode: 0.6 cm

Median: 0.6 cm

Lower quartile: 0.6 cm

Upper quartile: 0.9 cm

Interquartile range: 0.9-0.6=0.3 cm

Semi-interquartile range: 0.3÷2=0.15 cm

Aware to on track with my second hypothesis and to avoid endless diagrams, I’ve only chosen year 7(youngest) and 11(oldest) for this interpretation.

Year 7 had smaller values than the year 11. There was 25% of year 7 who were 0.4 cm away from the actual line whilst 12.5% of year 11 was at this category.

The two year groups both had 50% of people who were 0.6 cm away from the actual line. However, 25% of year 11 were 0.9 cm within whilst 12.5% of year 7 were at the same category. 12.5% of year 11 were 1.6 cm within whilst 12.5% of year 7 were 1.4 cm within.

...read more.

Middle

Median: 7.5°

Lower quartile: 3°

Upper quartile: 8°

Interquartile range: 8-3=5°

Semi-interquartile range: 5÷2=2.5    

Year 11

Mode: 8°

Median: 8°

Lower quartile: 7.5°

Upper quartile: 8°

Interquartile range: 8-7.5=0.5°

Semi-interquartile range: 0.5÷2=0.25°

Aware to be on track with my second hypothesis and to avoid endless diagrams, I’ve only chosen year 7 (youngest) and 11(oldest) for this interpretation. Year 11 have a smaller interquartile range. The mode was the same for both but the median was slightly smaller for the year 7. Though 12.5% of both year groups were 2° away from the actual angle but there was 25% of year 7 was 3° away from the actual angle.

75% of year 11 was 8° within whilst 50% of year 7 was at the same category. More of year 11 was further away from the actual angle than year 7.

Conclusion

After interpreting the results, I have reached a conclusion. My hypothesis was that the older a person gets, the better they are at estimating the actual measurement.

There was a slight confusion with all the year groups but I still tried

...read more.

Conclusion

I had proven that my two hypotheses were right, at a certain degree. This could be clearer if I improved the ways to interpret my hypotheses. My rule for these two hypotheses is that the closer towards the actual measurement, the more accurate they are. And vice versa, the further, the less accurate.

One of the main factors that I could have improved was to increase the size of the sample; 40 was a bit too small and besides the bigger the sample, the more data to compare. Another factor to have considered was the method of how to get my sample. I could have used random sampling with a calculator or a computer; I press the built-in ‘random’ button, which will give me the sample. This surely will decrease the likelihood of introducing bias.

I could have used other ways like pie charts, scatter graphs to interpret the results. More interpretations could clarify which participant(s) is/are more accurate. It would make the conclusion more obvious.

I should have specified the hypotheses; e.g. year 7 are better at estimating the line.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. Guestimation - investigating whether or not if people are good at guessing the length ...

    Median is approximately 5cms Estimate (?) >10 - 20> >20 - 30> >30 - 40> >40 - 50> >50 - 60> >60 - 70> >70 - 80> >80 - 90> >90 - 100> Totals Frequency 3 10 12 12 1 1 2 4 1 46 Mid-interval value 15 25 35

  2. Statistics. The purpose of this coursework is to investigate the comparative relationships between the ...

    of owners = 77 77/46 = 1.68 no. of owners datum-mean square deviation 2 0.32 0.1024 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 2 0.32 0.1024 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 2 0.32 0.1024 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624 1 -0.68 0.4624

  1. Used Cars - What main factor that affects the price of a second hand ...

    the ratio is, 69:89:92 Now to find how this ratio of cars that should be in the sample of 50 cars, Small cars: (50 / 250) x 69 = 13.8 Medium cars: (50 / 250) x 89 = 17.8 Large cars: (50 / 250)

  2. "The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    am going to start from the 127th piece of data and count down 6 pieces of data (as 6 was the number produced from the generator between 0 and 10) and then every 6th piece of data after that I am going to use until I have the 33 pieces of data I need for the year 11's.

  1. Guestimate - investigate how well people estimate the length of lines and the size ...

    There is also a form of bias from using systematic random sampling. This is that I could end up with my entire sample being in one set, which could influence my results substantially. However this is very unlikely that every 5th student would be in set 1, but I would rather not take any chances.

  2. "Males in the 11-18years age range will guess the angles and lengths better than ...

    f 45 40 2.5 10 90 f 45 37 3.2 11 91 f 44 45 3 12 92 f 43 45 4.5 13 93 f 43 40 3.2 14 96 f 42 45 4.5 15 97 f 42 45 5.1 16 99 f 41 45 5 17 101 f 38

  1. We are conducting an investigation to discover how accurate people in our school are ...

    There are a total of 236 students and for the purposes of our investigation a stratified random sample of 60 must be taken. Year 7 119 Students 50 Girls 69 Boys No of year 7 needed = 119/236 x 60 = 30.25= 30 students from year 7 No of female

  2. Investigate people's judgement of measurements.

    43 9 23 21 0 2 53 100 10.5 20 34 30 15 12 31 11 50 34 34.5 5 34 18.5 40 33 21 28 25 22 32 31 56 61 78 22 10 30 13 47 18 12 22 24 16 36 39 22 42 53 40 29

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work