• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparative stem and leaf diagram of error lines

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparative stem and leaf diagram of error lines

Key: 0  4=0.4 cm

Year 7: 0.4, 0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 1.4

Year 11: 0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 0.9, 1.6

Year7                                                                              

Mode: 0.6 cm

Median: 0.6 cm

Lower quartile: 0.5 cm

Upper quartile: 0.75 cm

Interquartile range: 0.75-0.5=0.25 cm

Semi-interquartile range: 0.25÷2=0.125 cm

Year 11

Mode: 0.6 cm

Median: 0.6 cm

Lower quartile: 0.6 cm

Upper quartile: 0.9 cm

Interquartile range: 0.9-0.6=0.3 cm

Semi-interquartile range: 0.3÷2=0.15 cm

Aware to on track with my second hypothesis and to avoid endless diagrams, I’ve only chosen year 7(youngest) and 11(oldest) for this interpretation.

Year 7 had smaller values than the year 11. There was 25% of year 7 who were 0.4 cm away from the actual line whilst 12.5% of year 11 was at this category.

The two year groups both had 50% of people who were 0.6 cm away from the actual line. However, 25% of year 11 were 0.9 cm within whilst 12.5% of year 7 were at the same category. 12.5% of year 11 were 1.6 cm within whilst 12.5% of year 7 were 1.4 cm within.

...read more.

Middle

Median: 7.5°

Lower quartile: 3°

Upper quartile: 8°

Interquartile range: 8-3=5°

Semi-interquartile range: 5÷2=2.5    

Year 11

Mode: 8°

Median: 8°

Lower quartile: 7.5°

Upper quartile: 8°

Interquartile range: 8-7.5=0.5°

Semi-interquartile range: 0.5÷2=0.25°

Aware to be on track with my second hypothesis and to avoid endless diagrams, I’ve only chosen year 7 (youngest) and 11(oldest) for this interpretation. Year 11 have a smaller interquartile range. The mode was the same for both but the median was slightly smaller for the year 7. Though 12.5% of both year groups were 2° away from the actual angle but there was 25% of year 7 was 3° away from the actual angle.

75% of year 11 was 8° within whilst 50% of year 7 was at the same category. More of year 11 was further away from the actual angle than year 7.

Conclusion

After interpreting the results, I have reached a conclusion. My hypothesis was that the older a person gets, the better they are at estimating the actual measurement.

There was a slight confusion with all the year groups but I still tried

...read more.

Conclusion

I had proven that my two hypotheses were right, at a certain degree. This could be clearer if I improved the ways to interpret my hypotheses. My rule for these two hypotheses is that the closer towards the actual measurement, the more accurate they are. And vice versa, the further, the less accurate.

One of the main factors that I could have improved was to increase the size of the sample; 40 was a bit too small and besides the bigger the sample, the more data to compare. Another factor to have considered was the method of how to get my sample. I could have used random sampling with a calculator or a computer; I press the built-in ‘random’ button, which will give me the sample. This surely will decrease the likelihood of introducing bias.

I could have used other ways like pie charts, scatter graphs to interpret the results. More interpretations could clarify which participant(s) is/are more accurate. It would make the conclusion more obvious.

I should have specified the hypotheses; e.g. year 7 are better at estimating the line.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. Guestimation - investigating whether or not if people are good at guessing the length ...

    Median is approximately 5cms Estimate (?) >10 - 20> >20 - 30> >30 - 40> >40 - 50> >50 - 60> >60 - 70> >70 - 80> >80 - 90> >90 - 100> Totals Frequency 3 10 12 12 1 1 2 4 1 46 Mid-interval value 15 25 35

  2. Statistics. The purpose of this coursework is to investigate the comparative relationships between the ...

    A second graph will now be plotted to see if my second hypothesis is correct. If this is the case, there should be a positive correlation: this should show that the car's value depreciates as years are added.

  1. Guestimate - investigate how well people estimate the length of lines and the size ...

    I would press this 8 times if I needed 8 students, and so on. Another reason for putting the set number before the random button is that the calculator is likely to give a decimal number. If it still gives a decimal number I will just take the 1st 2 digits before the decimal point and without rounding.

  2. Estimating the length of a line and the size of an angle.

    So each year strata needs to be represented fairly in the sample by the number of people in each year group being proportional to the group size and then the selection could be made randomly which will be fair. So I will be using stratified sampling to collect the data I need.

  1. "The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    am going to start from the 127th piece of data and count down 6 pieces of data (as 6 was the number produced from the generator between 0 and 10) and then every 6th piece of data after that I am going to use until I have the 33 pieces of data I need for the year 11's.

  2. Estimation and testing of Hypotheses.

    5 37 3.9 38 4.5 39 4.8 40 5 41 4.5 42 4.5 43 4.9 44 4.3 45 4.5 46 5 47 4.5 48 4 49 4.5 50 4.5 51 4 52 5.5 53 5 54 4.5 55 4.5 56 3.9 57 4 58 3.9 59 3.9 60 4 Organisation

  1. Estimating the length of the line and the size of the angle

    Line 1 = 8.7cm Line 2 = 5.3 cm Angle 1 = 37? Angle 2 = 63? The first method which I chose was to use a table with certain groups of values in it e.g. 10-19 degrees. Then I would make a tally to record the results.

  2. I am investigating how well people estimate the length of a line and the ...

    In a simple random sample, I would select subjects randomly from a single large pool of data. In a stratified random sample, I will divide this large pool of subjects into several groups called strata (in this case strata will be gender and year group)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work