• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4

# Comparative stem and leaf diagram of error lines

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparative stem and leaf diagram of error lines

Key: 0  4=0.4 cm

Year 7: 0.4, 0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 1.4

Year 11: 0.4, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 0.9, 1.6

Year7

Mode: 0.6 cm

Median: 0.6 cm

Lower quartile: 0.5 cm

Upper quartile: 0.75 cm

Interquartile range: 0.75-0.5=0.25 cm

Semi-interquartile range: 0.25÷2=0.125 cm

Year 11

Mode: 0.6 cm

Median: 0.6 cm

Lower quartile: 0.6 cm

Upper quartile: 0.9 cm

Interquartile range: 0.9-0.6=0.3 cm

Semi-interquartile range: 0.3÷2=0.15 cm

Aware to on track with my second hypothesis and to avoid endless diagrams, I’ve only chosen year 7(youngest) and 11(oldest) for this interpretation.

Year 7 had smaller values than the year 11. There was 25% of year 7 who were 0.4 cm away from the actual line whilst 12.5% of year 11 was at this category.

The two year groups both had 50% of people who were 0.6 cm away from the actual line. However, 25% of year 11 were 0.9 cm within whilst 12.5% of year 7 were at the same category. 12.5% of year 11 were 1.6 cm within whilst 12.5% of year 7 were 1.4 cm within.

Middle

Median: 7.5°

Lower quartile: 3°

Upper quartile: 8°

Interquartile range: 8-3=5°

Semi-interquartile range: 5÷2=2.5

Year 11

Mode: 8°

Median: 8°

Lower quartile: 7.5°

Upper quartile: 8°

Interquartile range: 8-7.5=0.5°

Semi-interquartile range: 0.5÷2=0.25°

Aware to be on track with my second hypothesis and to avoid endless diagrams, I’ve only chosen year 7 (youngest) and 11(oldest) for this interpretation. Year 11 have a smaller interquartile range. The mode was the same for both but the median was slightly smaller for the year 7. Though 12.5% of both year groups were 2° away from the actual angle but there was 25% of year 7 was 3° away from the actual angle.

75% of year 11 was 8° within whilst 50% of year 7 was at the same category. More of year 11 was further away from the actual angle than year 7.

Conclusion

After interpreting the results, I have reached a conclusion. My hypothesis was that the older a person gets, the better they are at estimating the actual measurement.

There was a slight confusion with all the year groups but I still tried

Conclusion

I had proven that my two hypotheses were right, at a certain degree. This could be clearer if I improved the ways to interpret my hypotheses. My rule for these two hypotheses is that the closer towards the actual measurement, the more accurate they are. And vice versa, the further, the less accurate.

One of the main factors that I could have improved was to increase the size of the sample; 40 was a bit too small and besides the bigger the sample, the more data to compare. Another factor to have considered was the method of how to get my sample. I could have used random sampling with a calculator or a computer; I press the built-in ‘random’ button, which will give me the sample. This surely will decrease the likelihood of introducing bias.

I could have used other ways like pie charts, scatter graphs to interpret the results. More interpretations could clarify which participant(s) is/are more accurate. It would make the conclusion more obvious.

I should have specified the hypotheses; e.g. year 7 are better at estimating the line.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

1. ## Guestimation - investigating whether or not if people are good at guessing the length ...

Median is approximately 5cms Estimate (?) >10 - 20> >20 - 30> >30 - 40> >40 - 50> >50 - 60> >60 - 70> >70 - 80> >80 - 90> >90 - 100> Totals Frequency 3 10 12 12 1 1 2 4 1 46 Mid-interval value 15 25 35

2. ## Statistics. The purpose of this coursework is to investigate the comparative relationships between the ...

9995 2995 6 64000 2 100 Vauxhall Vectra 13435 5 52000 2 This is randomly ordered, to get a general trend in data, so my results will not be biased. However, I have 4 pieces of missing data: I will need to fix this using Standard Deviation.

1. ## Used Cars - What main factor that affects the price of a second hand ...

to make a conclusion and find out the main factor that affects the price of a second hand car. Also I will be able to find out which car size has the biggest price spread and depreciation. Sample of cars In order to carry out this investigation, I will need to collect a sample of 50.

2. ## &amp;quot;The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

am going to start from the 127th piece of data and count down 6 pieces of data (as 6 was the number produced from the generator between 0 and 10) and then every 6th piece of data after that I am going to use until I have the 33 pieces of data I need for the year 11's.

1. ## Guestimate - investigate how well people estimate the length of lines and the size ...

Because of this I am using Stratified random sampling, as there are no forms of bias for this way. To help me work out how many students I needed from each set I used this information: Set and Year Total No.

2. ## &amp;quot;Males in the 11-18years age range will guess the angles and lengths better than ...

39 5.3 18 106 f 35 45 5 19 108 f 31 45 7 20 110 f 30 35 10 These samples are now easier to work with and compare. I can now use these samples to make Frequency polygons of angle and length estimates of each of the groups.

1. ## We are conducting an investigation to discover how accurate people in our school are ...

Sampling To make sure that a representative sample of students is used, I will take a stratified random sample for the data collection. As we are using students from both Years 7 and 11 we will use class lists to establish how many boys and girls were in both years, and also the appropriate totals of students.

2. ## Investigate people's judgement of measurements.

43 9 23 21 0 2 53 100 10.5 20 34 30 15 12 31 11 50 34 34.5 5 34 18.5 40 33 21 28 25 22 32 31 56 61 78 22 10 30 13 47 18 12 22 24 16 36 39 22 42 53 40 29

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to