• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I am going to investigate the hypothesis that girls do better than boys at KS3 and that Market Bosworth have better KS3 results than Winstanley.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction

        I am going to investigate the hypothesis that girls do better than boys at KS3 and that Market Bosworth have better KS3 results than Winstanley.

        The random samples that I’m going to take are 60 girls and 60 boys, so to make it fair I’m going to take 20 girls from each school and 20 boys. When comparing Market Bosworth and Winstanley’s results I will take a sample of 60 pupils from each school, 30 boys and 30 girls. I chose to take these samples because it gave an equal amount of pupil’s male/female or Market Bosworth/Winstanley to avoid any bias results.

        I’m also I’m going to draw a box plot using the lower quartile, upper quartile and median results from the cumulative frequency diagram this will help me produce a inter quartile range and this will tell me the range of marks the middle 50%.

        When associating the levels with a number I will have to give B, N and E a value, this will help

...read more.

Middle

        I drew out a few diagrams such as the box plot (already mentioned), a cumulative frequency diagram and a histogram.

The C/F diagram showed very close scores in between the girls and the boys, this was shown by the way the ‘s’ shaped lines overlapped each other with no real anomaly results showing clearly. The histogram yet again has shown a positive result in connection with my hypothesis; there was a constructive amount of scores between the marks 17- 20 where the frequency density was higher than 5 and reached all the way to 11, on the other hand the boys ranged from a frequency density of 2 to 6 in between the marks 17- 20.

Market Bosworth do better than Winstanley?

        My results do support my hypothesis that Market Bosworth has better KS3 results than Winstanley; this has been shown when I calculated the mean of the mid-point multiplied by the frequency divided by the number of pupils taken in the sample I took. Bosworth had shown to have a higher mean than Winstanley, Bosworth with a mean of 17.067 and Winstanley with a mean of 14.5.

...read more.

Conclusion

        The only real problem I came across was tallying up the marks to put in the group frequency table.

        If I were to do this again I would have used a stratified sample to make it fairer and to give a fair and more accurate out come overall.

        Also we used secondary evidence, so next time I would used primary, this way I know for certain that nobody had changed any of the marks. I also might used pupils actual score from the tests they did instead of using the level they got because they might have a really high 6 or a really low 6 for example and by using the actual marks from the tests the results could have been very much more accurate.

        I think I would have thought more carefully about how I would deal with marks classed as ‘B’,’N’ and ‘E’ to make it simpler or I could even leave them out.

        I could also improve my method by using a larger sample to give a wider range of results with yet again a better out come of more accurate result being produced at the end.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. "The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    This shows that people who may have estimated the smallest value for the size of the angle, didn't necessarily estimate the smallest value for the length of the line. This graph shows the year 11 data. Again, the thick, black lines show the actual length of the line and size of the angle.

  2. AS statistics coursework - correlation coefficient between height and weight in year 11 boys ...

    when using the least squares regression. To check how accurate my line of best fit is I chose 3 boys at random and put their height value into the line equation in place of x to give me a theoretical value for y (weight), which I will then compare to their actual weight: 1.

  1. I am going to design and then carry out an experiment to test people's ...

    11 46 13 9 13.5 13 11 47 15.5 15 14.5 16.5 11 48 15 17 15 15 11 49 15 13.5 7 12 11 50 7 5 16 10 11 51 15 4 8 5 11 52 15 21 18.5 18 11 53 8 7 11 10 11 54

  2. Used Cars - What main factor that affects the price of a second hand ...

    48.5 1 47.5 2256.25 50 5 45 2025 40 7 33 1089 24 12 12 144 21 14 7 49 32 16 16 256 9 33.5 -24.5 600.25 1 37 -36 1296 28 13 15 225 42 19 23 529 37 19 18 324 48.5 9 39.5 1560.25 43 10

  1. My first hypothesis is that school pupils can estimate the length of a ...

    The median for the angle was 45�, which is 7� out of the actual angle and the median for the line was 40mm, which is 9mm out of the actual line. This means that on average people are estimating angles better than lines.

  2. find out if there is a connection between people's IQ and their average KS2 ...

    in one go. I found the average easily as all I had to do was highlight the columns I needed in Excel and type in a formula. =AVERAGE(M2:O2) This gave me an average for the first person in my sample, then I dragged the little box down which copied and pasted my formula

  1. I want to find out if there is a connection between people's IQ and ...

    in one go. I found the average easily as all I had to do was highlight the columns I needed in Excel and type in a formula. =AVERAGE(M2:O2) This gave me an average for the first person in my sample, then I dragged the little box down which copied and pasted my formula

  2. Case study -Super Savers is wishing to move into the UK Food Retail market.

    In other words, samples may be lost, contaminated, or otherwise mishandled. Panellists may drop out before completing the test sequence. Participants may not correctly follow the rest protocol or they may misunderstand instructions. Technical personnel can make mistakes in serving other sequences.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work