• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I am going to investigate the hypothesis that girls do better than boys at KS3 and that Market Bosworth have better KS3 results than Winstanley.

Extracts from this document...



        I am going to investigate the hypothesis that girls do better than boys at KS3 and that Market Bosworth have better KS3 results than Winstanley.

        The random samples that I’m going to take are 60 girls and 60 boys, so to make it fair I’m going to take 20 girls from each school and 20 boys. When comparing Market Bosworth and Winstanley’s results I will take a sample of 60 pupils from each school, 30 boys and 30 girls. I chose to take these samples because it gave an equal amount of pupil’s male/female or Market Bosworth/Winstanley to avoid any bias results.

        I’m also I’m going to draw a box plot using the lower quartile, upper quartile and median results from the cumulative frequency diagram this will help me produce a inter quartile range and this will tell me the range of marks the middle 50%.

        When associating the levels with a number I will have to give B, N and E a value, this will help

...read more.


        I drew out a few diagrams such as the box plot (already mentioned), a cumulative frequency diagram and a histogram.

The C/F diagram showed very close scores in between the girls and the boys, this was shown by the way the ‘s’ shaped lines overlapped each other with no real anomaly results showing clearly. The histogram yet again has shown a positive result in connection with my hypothesis; there was a constructive amount of scores between the marks 17- 20 where the frequency density was higher than 5 and reached all the way to 11, on the other hand the boys ranged from a frequency density of 2 to 6 in between the marks 17- 20.

Market Bosworth do better than Winstanley?

        My results do support my hypothesis that Market Bosworth has better KS3 results than Winstanley; this has been shown when I calculated the mean of the mid-point multiplied by the frequency divided by the number of pupils taken in the sample I took. Bosworth had shown to have a higher mean than Winstanley, Bosworth with a mean of 17.067 and Winstanley with a mean of 14.5.

...read more.


        The only real problem I came across was tallying up the marks to put in the group frequency table.

        If I were to do this again I would have used a stratified sample to make it fairer and to give a fair and more accurate out come overall.

        Also we used secondary evidence, so next time I would used primary, this way I know for certain that nobody had changed any of the marks. I also might used pupils actual score from the tests they did instead of using the level they got because they might have a really high 6 or a really low 6 for example and by using the actual marks from the tests the results could have been very much more accurate.

        I think I would have thought more carefully about how I would deal with marks classed as ‘B’,’N’ and ‘E’ to make it simpler or I could even leave them out.

        I could also improve my method by using a larger sample to give a wider range of results with yet again a better out come of more accurate result being produced at the end.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. Investigatings heights of girls and boys in year seven.

    130 ?x> 140 3 3 140 ?x> 150 22 25 150 ?x> 155 3 28 155 ?x> 160 8 36 160 ?x> 170 4 40 170 ?x> 175 0 40 These are my results for the girls' data: Height Frequency Cumulative Frequency 130 ?x> 140 2 2 140 ?x> 150

  2. Application of number: level 3 - Is House Buying a Good Idea or Not?

    median values for first-time buyers' houses and all houses and the 30th value of the last cumulative frequency table is equivalent to the median for all houses. The median price for all houses is also between the first-time buyers' houses' median and the other houses' median.

  1. Throughout this experiment I have decided that I am going to investigate the tensile ...

    limit is several times the 0.5mm so that I will get consistent results. To ensure that the extension is measured as accurately as possible I will take multiple readings and take the mean of them as an average value. This will maximise accuracy.

  2. "The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    The LQ for this curve is approximately 38�. The median is approximately 43�. The UQ is approximately 47�. This means that the IQR is 47 - 38 which equals 9�. The next curve is for the year 9 estimates of angle 6. The LQ for this curve is approximately 37�.

  1. Identifying Relationships -Introduction to Statistical Inference.

    153.4 ) x 100 = 40.88 For London Coefficient of Variation = ( 69.07 ? 183.19 ) x 100 = 37.70 The standard deviation for the South West group is 40.88% of the mean and the standard deviation for the London group is 37.70% of the mean.

  2. Mayfield High Statistics - I am going to investigate how your weight affects your ...

    The less number of hours you spend watching TV in a week the less you weigh, therefore less BMI. * The means of transport used has an affect on your BMI The more active yours means of transport the less you weigh.

  1. Development of Quantitative and Qualitative measures of Human Impact on Wimbledon Common.

    From the varied procedures mentioned in the literature given for completeness in appendix 2. Three have been chosen and suitably modified to suit the present project. By recording a minimum set of data it is possible to use any of the three methods.

  2. AS statistics coursework - correlation coefficient between height and weight in year 11 boys ...

    non-linear and the points may lie on a quadratic curve for example). A strong positive correlation would be around 0.7 to 0.9 and a strong negative around -0.7 to -0.9. "r" is the symbol used to indicate the product moment correlation coefficient.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work