• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating the Quadratic Function

Extracts from this document...


Investigating the Quadratic Function

This investigation is focused on how to solve quadratic functions by putting them into a perfect square.  The basic form of a quadratic function is y = ax² + bx + c. When drawn on a graph these functions create a parabola that opens down or opens up. The ‘a’ in the function refers to the leading coefficient; the value of this number decides wheather the parabola will be negative or positive. Positive parabolas open up whereas negative parabolas open down.

Here are a few graphs that illustrate positive parabolas that shift vertically due to a different value of ‘c’. The scale of all the graphs is 1 on both the y-axis and x-axis.

        A        B        C

y =x²                 y = x² + 3        y = x² -2


        The “vertex” is the co-ordinate where the parabola turns; this is also referred to as the “turning point”. In these three graphs we can see a clear transition of the parabola on the vertical y-axis. If the value being added to the ax² is positive the parabola shifts up, above the origin of the x-axis. Thusly if the value being added to the ax² is negative the parabola shifts down under the origin of the x-axis.

...read more.



A noticeable pattern is seen as the vertex of these parabolas shift from left to right on the x-axis. Now that the value being added is directly linked to the x value the position of the vertex changes on the x-axis, as this is the value being changed. If a value is added to ‘x’ the parabola moves to the left and the value on the x-axis is negative. To prove this I am going to use the function in graph F:

 The graph shows the x value to be –3 whereas the value being added to x is +3.

I am simply going to work out the equation by moving the numbers to the other side to leave x alone- y = (x + 3)²

        y = x² + 9         

         √-9 = √ x²                

         -3 = x

 So we see that positive values added to x will always end up negative therefore the opposite, all negative values, will show positive values on the x-axis for the parabola.

If the form ‘y = (x + b)²’ is modified to ‘y = a(x + b)² + c’ this is now “turning point form”. We already established that adding values to x² will move the vertex of a parabola up and down the y-axis.

...read more.


So to get the basic shape of a parabola first find the vertex by moving ‘h’ to the right and ‘g’ up, then substitute ‘0’ for ‘x’ and work out what ‘y’ will be to get the y-intercept. Once the y-intercept is found a curve can be drawn from the vertex to the y-intercept and since the line is a reflection through the line of the vertex the other side of the parabola can be draw as well.

        Some of the rules that apply to all the forms discussed in this investigation also apply to other forms. To translate a linier function on the y-axis you add or subtract a value directly to x just like mentioned before. The slope will stay the same but the interception of the y-axis will be different as the value implied on x changes.

y = 2x

y = 2x + 6


Observe how the blue line shifts its y- intercept as 6 is added to the equation

If x is raised to any even number the parabola will observe the exact same rules as x².

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    9 729 2916 General proof - (x+h)^4 - x^4 = x^4 + h^4 +4hx� + 6x�h� + 4xh� - x^4 = x + h - x h h (h� + 4x� +6x�h +4xh�) = h� + 4x� +6x�h +4xh� h H tends to 0 again here, and every term contains an h except for (4x�).

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    It suggests that the equation dose quit well from 1950-1972, this can be showed in Figure 1(b), the scale (residual) in this diagram is quit small during the same period. The situation changed after mid-1970s, the gap in Figure1 (a)

  1. The open box problem

    X 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 V 242 244.944 247.192 248.768 249.696 250 249.704 248.832 247.408 245.456 243 This table now suggests that the maximum volume is 250 and that x is 2.5. To prove this again I will construct two graphs.

  2. Triminoes Investigation

    also that leads me to working out the formula for the area of the triangle. a + b + c + d = 4 1/6 + 1 + 11/6 + d = 4 12/6 + 1 + d = 4 2 + 1 d = 4 d = 4 -3

  1. Investigation into combined transoformations of 6 trigonometric functions

    Graph 2 - Will cross the x-axis at (0,2) Graph 3 - Will cross the x-axis at (0,-2) Graph 4 - Will cross the x-axis at (0,2) Graph 5 - Will cross the x-axis at (0,-2) Results Graph 1 Graph 2 Graph 3 Graph 4 Graph 5 As you can see from all the results my predictions were correct.

  2. Investigation of the Phi Function

    1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 23, which are not divisible by 2 or 3, so all of them are co-prime with 24. b) i ?(18) = {1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17} = 6 ii ?(41) = 40, because it is a prime number, so it has

  1. Math Portfolio Type II - Applications of Sinusoidal Functions

    Use a sinusoidal regression to find the equation for the number of hours of daylight as a function of the day number, n, for Toronto. Write your equation in the form T(n) = a sin[b(n - c)] + d, with a, b, c, and d rounded to the nearest thousandth.

  2. Fractals. In order to create a fractal, you will need to be acquainted ...

    However, we want to figure out the dimension of the SierpiÅksi Triangle. When trying to explain why the first, second, and third dimensions are recognized as a line, plane, and cube, many fail to know the real reason. People say it is determined by length, width, and height, or the self-similarity in a line and a plane.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work