• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Numerical integration coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Numerical integration coursework

Problem

image00.png

For this coursework, I am going to use my knowledge of numerical methods to produce an approximation to an area which does not have an analytic solution. I will be finding the approximation, to an appropriate degree of accuracy, of the integral shown above. On the graph below is the area that I will be approximating underneath the curve of y=image01.png

 from x=0 to x=2. Note that throughout my method I worked in radians.

image19.png

This problem is appropriate for numerical solution as I chose my graph to be a polynomial curve involving a square root so that there would be no analytical solution. Due to the fact that I cannot yet integrate functions like this approximating methods will have to be used. According to the numerical methods module the three approximation methods to be used are:

Mid-point rule- this method was adopted because it is used to approximate the area underneath the graph by dividing it up into individual rectangles.

Trapezium rule- this method was adopted because it is used to approximate the area underneath the graph, this is done so by dividing it up into individual trapeziums.

Simpson’s rule- I have realised that out of the

...read more.

Middle

Sn= 2(Mn) +Tn

    3

Extrapolating my answers to the Simpson’s rule to infinity will be the most accurate answer that I can give.  

Formula view of my method for approximations

Here I will briefly show how I used algorithms on Microsoft Excel to reach my approximations:image24.png

Mid-point rule

Trapezium rule

image25.png

Simpson’s rule

image26.png

Error analysis

As all three rules are actually only approximations there is always error involved, they are all gradually converging towards the actual solution. In reference to my graph the integral section is concave which means that the trapezium rule gives an overestimate and the mid-point rule gives an underestimate. As the number of strips increases the trapezium rule will tend to the solution from above and the mid-point rule will tend from below.

Error in the mid-point rule

In the mid-point rule the error is proportional to the width of the rectangle squared, or in mathematical terms, absolute error Mn= kh2, wherek is the constant. If the mid-point rule with n strips has a strip width of h, then the mid-point rule with 2n strips has a strip width ofh/2.

Hence:  image02.png

Therefore when you double the amount of strips (n) the error decreases by about a factor of 4, the error multiplier is therefore 0.25.

Error in the trapezium rule

The error connected to the trapezium rule is the same as the error in the mid-point rule.

...read more.

Conclusion

image12.png

Using this formula we can now extrapolate our answers of Mⁿ to infinity.

image21.png

image22.png

Trapezium rule

Similarly you can use the formula for image13.png

 in the same way, just replacing M with T due to the error multiplier being the same.

image14.png

image21.png

image22.png

Simpson’s rule

If you follow through the same steps as we did for the mid-point you similarly reach a formula for extrapolating Simpson’s rule to infinity:

image15.png

image21.png

image22.png

Interpretation

So in conclusion I can confidently quote my solution to the integral image00.png

  to 8 significant figures:

10.193205

This is due to the three approximations that I reached (17 sig figs):

image16.png

10.1932054791824

image17.png

10.1932054077805

image18.png

10.1932054458615

There was however some limitation. The software, Microsoft Excel, only calculated to 15 decimal places inevitably producing minimal amounts of error with each calculation done. To further improve my results I could have used better mathematical software which worked to more decimal places, but for a problem like this Excel was more than sufficient.

The fact that the trapezium rule and the mid-point rule give the same solution up to 8 significant figures guarantees that my solution is valid to this many significant figures. This is because, as I have indicated in the paragraphs dealing with error analysis, in the integral section of my graph the trapezium rule tends towards the solution from above and the mid-point rule from below meaning the solution is between the two. Simpson’s rule, being a weighted average, is more accurate and therefore likewise proves the solution.

Overall then my solution is proved by 3 different rules.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    the overall gradient function, but I must find far more evidence than one solitary a value to give it any meaning. If this is the case, however, I think that when the co-efficient is 3, the whole gradient will be 3(nxn-1).

  2. Arctic Research (Maths Coursework)

    For right angled triangle velocities only 2 calculations are needed to find the time it takes for the journey. I will use Pythagoras theorem and trigonometry of a right angled triangle. Departure Journey from Base Camp to observation site A Pythagoras' Theorem to find the speed of the flight a2 = b2 + c2 3402 = 302 + R.V.

  1. Methods of Advanced Mathematics (C3) Coursework.

    0.6180339885 6.2360679817 0.0000000005 1.5369737685 0.0000000082 -0.0000000005 1.5369737675 -0.0000000121 Green corresponds with route 1, Red with route 2 and yellow with route three.

  2. Although everyone who gambles at all probably tries to make a quick mental marginal ...

    Sum to infinity = when a is the first term in the sequence, and r is the ratio between terms. Thus = one has a 1 in 4 chance of making money when paying a $5 entry price. When compared to Case 1 and its odds of making money this game seems quite good.

  1. Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

    In this case this method will fail to find the target root we want. If we want to find the target root then we have to set up upper and lower bound very close to the target root in order to find the target root.

  2. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    f(??? ?f(??) > the area of the underneath the curve in figure 1.0 is thus h f(??) + h f(??????h f(??) + h f(??? ???h f(??) > this can be generalised to Mn= h [f(??) + f(?????(??) + f(???????????f(?n)] Note that Mn is dependent on the number of rectangles.

  1. C3 Coursework: Numerical Methods

    The able shows that there is change of sign from 0.752 to 0.753. This means that the root of the equation must lie between 0.752 and 0.753. Our estimate of the root is with a maximum error of � 0.0005.

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    =0 Examining g?(x) graphically y=x so gradient 1 We can see 0<g?(x)<1 Root to f(x) =0 Since 0<g?(x)< 1 we expect to get staircase convergence and it is a success staircase and the result is the same as the expectations. A rearrangement of the same equation is applied in a situation where the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work