• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Brilliant Solution: From the Founding to the Present

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A Brilliant Solution: From the Founding to the Present For the United States, the years after the Revolution were celebratory for the citizens enjoying their new freedoms and painful for those involved in the government. The lack of a strong central government created a divided country, with men loyal to the state rather than the nation. From 1776 to 1787, the new nation debated as separate states over interstate conflicts, how to dissolve the economic crisis, and maintain a military without allowing any separate person, group or state access to its power. Under the Articles of Confederation, the central government had no power to enforce anything as a nation; each state controlled itself and was in a political battle to control every other, with the nation as their casualty. Under the Articles, every hope for a future of the United States seemed impossible. Many realized that only a unified country could fix the country's problems. In A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin reveals the conflicts and compromises that characterized the drafting of the Constitution. Berkin portrays the founding fathers as people not demigods, describes the solution the Constitution became and analyzes the current US, debating whether the founders of this government would approve of how it has evolved over the two hundred-twenty years following the Constitution to the present. ...read more.

Middle

When creating the Articles o Confederation, the contributors' main priority was to create a government that could never be left in the power of one person or group. Thus, state governments were to control the majority of the power, with the central government's actions to be enforcing the legislation passed. Unfortunately, the central government had no power to enforce anything. The national government could not raise an army to enforce decisions or collect taxes to pay Revolutionary War debts. The federal government did not even have a political figure head. Legislation had to be passed by the states with a two-thirds majority vote and no state wanted pay taxes to a central government or have their citizens pay any tax, except to the state government. In the Constitution, the founding fathers gave the central government the power to raise an army with the President as its Commander in Chief. They balanced that power by giving only Congress the right to declare war. The central government also gained the right to collect taxes. These changes in the government were enormous but the efficiency of the government produced was incredible in comparison. Each state printed its own currency, making the national currency worthless. Each state also placed tariffs on other states. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only a small percentage of the entire population has access to the amount of money it would take to finance a campaign. America was founded on the principals that all men were created equally and that any could be a leader if they were elected. The men who based our government on democratic ideals could not support those elected because they were the ones who were able to raise enough money to campaign. Many parts of the United States government has changed since the Constitution was signed; some changes are necessary others like the Patriot Act and the amount of money needed to campaign are ridiculous and undemocratic. "The men who framed the Constitution could not see into the future" (Berkin 205) but from the view from the future, it is difficult to comprehend that the founding fathers were not demigods and had no idea that the Constitution they created would bestow beatific effects lasting for generations. They were not sure their work would last, but they had a clear purpose and goals, and that created a brilliant solution for a new nation full of problems. Sources: Berkin, Carol. A Brilliant Solution : Inventing the American Constitution. New York: Harvest Books, 2003. "The Constitution of the United States," Amendment 5. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Do the strengths of the Constitution outweigh the weaknesses?

    Whilst one can posit that this problem has largely been eliminated, if one takes a look at modern day America, one can find that there are elements of discrimination in law regarding celebrities and wealthy personalities, or the vast inequality that surrounds the legal system in general; only the rich

  2. The Articles of Confederation.

    He wanted the national government clothed "with positive and compleat authority in all cases which require uniformity." The upper house of the legislature was to have a veto on the state legislation, and he proposed a national executive. The new government would have the power to enforce its laws.

  1. Constitutional Comparison

    This puts Britain in a more favourable light, as its constitutional arrangement is much more enamoured towards adaptation and change, usually for the better (such as the creation of the Welfare State under Clement Attlee s government). Furthermore, despite all of the aspects of the constitution that claim to protect citizen s rights it is no guarantee of civil liberties.

  2. A Foreign Policy of Freedom. A United States foreign policy of intervention, through ...

    Now it is spreading to the rest of the Middle East with Libya and the threat of war with Iran.

  1. Mexican Border Problems

    And we are now seeing a larger number of people cross our southern border who are from countries of interest as opposed to just Latin American [countries]." He pointed out that speaking about the illegal immigrants there is one more problem.

  2. Why did the Founding Fathers create the Vice Presidency?

    As you can see, the Framers spent a great amount of time and energy in developing the role of the presidency. Likewise, they spent a considerable amount of time and energy weaving checks and balances between the president, the Legislative and Judiciary into the structure of government they created (This Nation).

  1. The British Constitution

    He found himself having frequent disagreements with leading citizens over religion and expenditure. In March 1629, Charles dismissed his fourth parliament. His opponents later called this period 'the eleven years tyranny'. It was his measures to the raise income without parliament that made him unpopular with royal followers.

  2. This paper aims to examine Mabini's political stance for the Filipino Nation.

    As such, he is seen as a person who wanted to contribute to the Philippine government. He gave countless unsolicited advices on the appropriate government administration. An instance of this was the change of the Dictatorial government to a revolutionary government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work