• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Brilliant Solution: From the Founding to the Present

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A Brilliant Solution: From the Founding to the Present For the United States, the years after the Revolution were celebratory for the citizens enjoying their new freedoms and painful for those involved in the government. The lack of a strong central government created a divided country, with men loyal to the state rather than the nation. From 1776 to 1787, the new nation debated as separate states over interstate conflicts, how to dissolve the economic crisis, and maintain a military without allowing any separate person, group or state access to its power. Under the Articles of Confederation, the central government had no power to enforce anything as a nation; each state controlled itself and was in a political battle to control every other, with the nation as their casualty. Under the Articles, every hope for a future of the United States seemed impossible. Many realized that only a unified country could fix the country's problems. In A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin reveals the conflicts and compromises that characterized the drafting of the Constitution. Berkin portrays the founding fathers as people not demigods, describes the solution the Constitution became and analyzes the current US, debating whether the founders of this government would approve of how it has evolved over the two hundred-twenty years following the Constitution to the present. ...read more.

Middle

When creating the Articles o Confederation, the contributors' main priority was to create a government that could never be left in the power of one person or group. Thus, state governments were to control the majority of the power, with the central government's actions to be enforcing the legislation passed. Unfortunately, the central government had no power to enforce anything. The national government could not raise an army to enforce decisions or collect taxes to pay Revolutionary War debts. The federal government did not even have a political figure head. Legislation had to be passed by the states with a two-thirds majority vote and no state wanted pay taxes to a central government or have their citizens pay any tax, except to the state government. In the Constitution, the founding fathers gave the central government the power to raise an army with the President as its Commander in Chief. They balanced that power by giving only Congress the right to declare war. The central government also gained the right to collect taxes. These changes in the government were enormous but the efficiency of the government produced was incredible in comparison. Each state printed its own currency, making the national currency worthless. Each state also placed tariffs on other states. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only a small percentage of the entire population has access to the amount of money it would take to finance a campaign. America was founded on the principals that all men were created equally and that any could be a leader if they were elected. The men who based our government on democratic ideals could not support those elected because they were the ones who were able to raise enough money to campaign. Many parts of the United States government has changed since the Constitution was signed; some changes are necessary others like the Patriot Act and the amount of money needed to campaign are ridiculous and undemocratic. "The men who framed the Constitution could not see into the future" (Berkin 205) but from the view from the future, it is difficult to comprehend that the founding fathers were not demigods and had no idea that the Constitution they created would bestow beatific effects lasting for generations. They were not sure their work would last, but they had a clear purpose and goals, and that created a brilliant solution for a new nation full of problems. Sources: Berkin, Carol. A Brilliant Solution : Inventing the American Constitution. New York: Harvest Books, 2003. "The Constitution of the United States," Amendment 5. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. The British Constitution

    We now have a Prime Ministerial Style of government. It could be said that some believe this role is changing into a Presidential role. Like the US President, the British Prime Minister is a World Leader. Currently standing 'shoulder to shoulder' with America sending his troops to war. The Executive has an immense power.

  2. Do the strengths of the Constitution outweigh the weaknesses?

    can afford lawyers who have the sufficient knowledge and understanding of the constitution to manoeuvre it to suit their case, skewing 'justice' and therefore liberty. The natural counter to this argument lies in the first 10 amendments of the constitution, the bill of rights, in the eyes of the constitution,

  1. A Foreign Policy of Freedom. A United States foreign policy of intervention, through ...

    Now it is spreading to the rest of the Middle East with Libya and the threat of war with Iran.

  2. Why did the Founding Fathers create the Vice Presidency?

    As you can see, the Framers spent a great amount of time and energy in developing the role of the presidency. Likewise, they spent a considerable amount of time and energy weaving checks and balances between the president, the Legislative and Judiciary into the structure of government they created (This Nation).

  1. In 1901 Australia's most important founding document and symbol of our national life, The ...

    An example of this was seen in 1975 when Prime Minister Gough Whitlam was sacked by the Governor General, Sir John Kerr. The Queen played no part in his dismissal. It was a Constitutional issue, not an issue of the crown.

  2. Mexican Border Problems

    "I'm worried about our border," Sen. John McCain of Arizona said at a March 17 2005 at Senate hearing on threats facing the US. "We have now hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people who are crossing illegally every year.

  1. This paper aims to examine Mabini's political stance for the Filipino Nation.

    He always reminded the Filipinos to be steadfast, not to lose heart and continue the fight. Mabini was not only vocal against the pro-Americans. In his attempt to persuade those in the upper echelons of the government to fight for independence, he wanted to create a Philippines that was ready and self-supporting.

  2. Write a narrative from the chorus' speech on pg 137 till the soldiers speech ...

    Senator Grachius stood amongst the Senators. To himself he thought, who is this man to deny a man his right to the afterlife?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work