• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can parliament bind it's successors with the provision in the Northern Ireland Act 1998, s.1 (1)?

Extracts from this document...


Can parliament bind it's successors with the provision in the Northern Ireland Act 1998, s.1 (1)? The problem to be addressed in this essay is the issue of the British Parliament's ability to bind its successors, with particular attention to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 s.1 (1). Parliament's ability to limit its successors also relates to other issues which I will be looking at in detail. I will be focusing on a brief history of parliamentary supremacy and to what extent it is supreme, considering both the positives and negative of this. It seems appropriate to briefly look at the opinions of AV Dicey as well as cases where some think Parliament has bound its successors or has been bound by its predecessors. I will also be looking at the theory of 'manner an form' in terms of legislation and how this applies to the provision in the Northern Ireland Act 1998, s.1 (1). I defend the thesis that parliament should not be able to pass legislation which, in any way, limits or redefines it's successors, although in this case it becomes apparent that this might have occurred in relation to the Northern Ireland Act 1998. Can Parliament limit its successors? In the case of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, we must first look at s 1(1). ...read more.


it was contrary to the law of God or the law of nature or natural justice, but since the supremacy of parliament was finally demonstrated by the revolution of 1688 any such idea has become obsolete.2 Through Dicey, the unlimited powers of Parliament to legislate can be placed in three main headings; the power to make any law whatsoever, one manner of law-making and the absence of power to bind succeeding Parliaments.3 Parliament now appears to be completely supreme; all legislation now takes precedence over and could change the prerogative or common law. Any piece of legislation which parliament wishes to accomplish, after being received through the appropriate channels, can become Law in our state. This is seen to have both negative and positive aspects. Negative aspects include that 'there is no person or body of persons who can, under the English constitution, make rules which override or derogate from an Act of parliament, or which(to express the same thing in other words) will be enforced by the courts in contravention of an Act of Parliament.'4 The positive entails that parliament may legislate over any topic, but that parliamentary rulings and enactments must be recognised by the courts. It can however be explained that simply because statute law is superior this does not mean that Parliament may legislate upon anything, as will be shown. ...read more.


Future parliaments may be bound by past Acts in terms of the Act's inclusion of 'manner and form' of legislation, in as much as it may include certain conditions for the Act to be repealed such as achieving a two-thirds or certain percentage majority. Although, future Parliaments may choose to repeal the provisions, they may even choose to completely ignore the later Acts. Overall, Parliaments cannot bind their successors, it is a fundamental rule that this cannot happen. Parliaments are supreme. Past Acts made by past Parliaments are not relevant to the present Parliament, in that any Acts which they wish to change can be changed, when passed through the appropriate channels in Parliament. New Parliaments are sovereign and cannot be sovereign if they were to be bound by predecessors, they must be able to legislate effectively without any limits placed upon them. 1 Dicey, The Law of the Constitution, pp 39-40 2 British Railways Board v Pickin (1974) AC 765 3 Dicey pp 61 4 Dicey quote, Hilaire Barnett Constitutional and Administrative Law, pp 71 5 Vauxhall Estates Ltd v. Liverpool Corpn. (1932) 1 KB 733 6 Ellen Street Estates Ltd v. Minister Of Health (1934) KB 590 7 'the doctrine of implied repeal' Hilaire Barnett, Constitutional and Administrative Law, pp 39 8 Constitutional and Administrative Law, AW Bradley and KD Ewing, pp 61 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. priministers power

    The divide was between those who resisted European integration and those who welcomed it, or saw it as inevitable. * Since 1970 backbench MP's have been more willing to vote against their own leadership and sometimes with effect. The most dramatic example was in 1986 when over 100 Conservative MP's

  2. Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is ...

    The institutions fall ultimately under the control of Cabinet Ministers, who, it can be held, are controlled by the Prime Minister. Although the Prime Ministerial role may once have been open to accurate description as primus inter pares, it has long been the case that Cabinet Ministers are subordinate to the Prime Minister.

  1. How, and with what success, have governments attempted to improve the provision of health ...

    be put in to make a long term difference as it has to be an ongoing commitment of a stable amount of money placed in. The modernisation board also found difficulties with limited capacity of funds, old buildings and out of date equipment thus one can say that in the

  2. Describe the proposals made during the Second World War for the provision of a ...

    The Labour Party had a competent leader; Clement Attlee who was not only a major, which meant he was knowledgeable about military matters, but was also seen as a capable leader of home affairs. Before the election, Attlee was Deputy Prime Minister in the Coalition, so people were obviously familiar

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work