• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the contention that the House of Lords is irrelevant.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Joshua Watson. Discuss the contention that the house of lords is irrelevant. The House of Lords was, until the early 20th century the senior of the two houses in the British political system. Its members enjoyed greater powers than the members of the House of Commons, but as the 1911 and 1949 acts were introduced the powers of the Lords were greatly reduced. The abilities of the upper house became an issue as society became more democratic and concerned about the unrepresentative nature of the House; after all it was at one point hereditary peers only. It is now argued the House of Lords have become irrelevant because of its great reduction in powers and abilities to hold the lower house to account; it's still unrepresentative nature and lack of legitimacy. Beginning at the start of the reforms, under the Liberal government Lloyd George purpose the introduction of a land tax which would affect rich wealthy land owners. This bill was challenged by the conservatives, as many of them where wealthy land owners and wanted to raise import taxes instead. The bill went ahead and passed through the House of Commons, however when the Bill reached the upper house it was struck down by the Conservative lords. The Prime Minister Henry Asquith requested the king make sufficient Liberal Lords to pass the bill if the conservative lords reject it again. ...read more.


voting system. A good illustration of this role was when the Thatcher government enjoyed majorities of over 100 following the elections of 1983. This meant the House of Lords were improving parliamentary opposition, effectively holding government to account and making up for the opposition?s weakness. This scrutiny of the executive is made clear through the huge amount of time (around 80%) the Lords spend scrutinising and revising legislation. Their regular attendance and increasing numbers means the House is adopting this role very seriously ensuring their relevancy in the British political system. Arguably the House of Lords have become even more effective at performing this role after The House of Lords Act in 1998 because party leaderships have been selecting more professional politicians to become Lords, who are, arguably, better at scrutinising the executive. As we have seen before, the House of Lords is heavily involved in the Legislative process and although they can no longer stop bills that can (and commonly do) make amendments. A recent example of this was on the 3rd of November 2011, when the House of Lords made 6 amendments to the Armed Forces Bill. This is an important function of the House because it oversees the work of the executive and ensures the elected Government is remaining representative, ensuing accountability. Some criticize this oversight of the executive as irrelevant because the house is not elected, and is a very unrepresentative elitist group. ...read more.


This clearly shows that many political elites see the House as irrelevant in its current state, and would be become more relevant, up to date and perhaps even more effective if these reforms were to go ahead. The Electoral Reform Society see it as 'removing the burden from parliament'. The House of Lords is seen by some as a irrelevant institute that is out of touch with modern society. However I think the second chamber is crucial as it acts as a political safeguard that effectively holds the government to account in the event of poor opposition in the House of Commons. Although the House faces criticism for its undemocratic nature, it is this that allows it to remain a relevant part of society that does no unnecessarily damage the House of Commons. If the House were to be elected by a proportional representation system, such as STV suggested by the Electoral Reform Society, it would become a danger as it would be more representative of the people than the commons and could cause for a demand of power off the lower House. Overall I do not think the House of Lords is irrelevant in modern politics as it performs many important roles effectively, and although at first glance it seems out of place in a democratic society, it would be an executive dictatorship without it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The House of Commons is a highly effective parliamentary chamber" to what extent do ...

    4 star(s)

    So the legislative system is becoming more and more effective as years go by. Over all I do think the function of legislation makes the House of Commons a highly effective parliamentary chamber, as it does offer a good amount of opportunities to scrutinise which is key in a legislative system.

  2. Electing MPs to the House of Commons.

    Voters also tend to feel a natural link with the whole of Leeds, for example, rather than an allegiance to Leeds North or Leeds Central. They may prefer to have real influence with the MPs representing the whole of the city, rather than hold one MP responsible for their sector.

  1. Describe the formal process of statute creation and the role of the House of ...

    Consider the advantages and disadvantages of this process of law making. (B) There are many advantages of the legislative process, these include; 100 law are passed a year, this means that every year Parliament can pass about 100 new laws.

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    Only 114 seats were estimated to be uncertainties between Labour and the Conservative's in 2001. This could contribute to an apathetic attitude amongst the electorate, as, if people don't believe that their vote counts, they won't bother voting at all, which could contribute to an even lower turnout.

  1. House Of Lords Reform - What did the 1999 act reforming the lords ...

    Just because their father was a lord, it does not necessarily make the inherited lords any good at doing the job. Also, the life peers may have been very old and thus could mean that many of the life peers could not attend the House.

  2. Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform ...

    A mixed chamber could of course comprise of more elected peers than nominated or more nominated peers than elected, or a House of equal content. These three options which will result in a mixed chamber will be discussed in the form of recommendations made by Lord Wakeham, the chairman of

  1. What Ways Did The Liberal Government Implement Social And Welfare Reforms 1906-1911 Bring About ...

    It could be argued that what the Lords weren't necessarily looking after their own self-interests but in fact the interests of the Conservative Party and its leader Balfour. The Lords were classed as 'Balfour's Poodle' as opposed to being the Watchdog of the Constitution.

  2. Reforming the Lords - Elected Second Chamber

    As a result, chances are high that people will simply vote for ?another politician? than for somebody who does not belong to any party at all but who might have been the right candidate. This is strengthened by the fact that politicians usually possess the ability to sell themselves in public, whereas others may seem intimidated in comparison.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work