• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that a Bill of rights alone is insufficient to protect rights and liberties.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the view that a 'Bill of rights' alone is insufficient to protect rights and liberties. A Bill of Rights effectively outlines the rights and liberties of the people. In the USA the first ten amendments to the constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. Of the ten amendments in the Bill of Rights, the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 8th and 10th are perhaps the most important today. For example, the 1st Amendments guarantee basic rights such as, freedom of religion; freedom of speech; freedom of the press; and freedom of assembly. These are just a few of the many rights and liberties stated in the Bill of Rights, so why are people to argue that a Bill of Rights alone is insufficient to protect rights and liberties? Although the American Constitution and particularly the first ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights promise the citizens of the United States certain rights and protections, the civil rights record of the country highlights the fragile nature of such abstract promises. The constitution does not define the meaning of such phrases as 'liberty' or 'equal rights,' and therefore it is the responsibility of the courts, the un-elected branch of government, to make meaning through rulings they make on cases of constitutional importance. ...read more.


If you take the abortion cases of Planned Parenthood vs Casey and Gonzales vs Carhart, this shows the court chipping away at abortion rights. Being so, this leads to 'judicial tyranny,' as judges are able to make laws and to interpret them. Judges are unelected and also socially unrepresentative, so this expanded role for the judiciary highlights an undemocratic nature, which therefore suggests a Bill of Rights alone is insufficient to protect rights and liberties. It is evident that the USA Bill of Rights has failed to protect the rights and liberties of a significant minority of its citizens, as throughout history politicians and more importantly judges have firstly failed to grant certain groups civil rights and liberties in their most basic form. The arguments suggesting a Bill of Rights alone is insufficient in protecting rights and liberties do appear convincing; however many would put forward arguments in favour of a Bill of Rights being sufficient to protect rights and liberties. As mentioned before, the Bill of Rights although codified is in fact vague. Take the 1st and 11th amendment for example; this can be applied to many situations that alone protect the rights and liberties. ...read more.


suspected to being a terrorist to either have a trial or to have the same maximum amount of time in prison without one as every other suspected criminal. Furthermore a Bill of Rights may never have allowed political parties such as the BNP to discriminate against who joins the party. Being so, this may well suggest a reason why a Bill of Rights alone can be sufficient in protecting rights and liberties. In conclusion, history has proven that in the USA a Bill of Rights has failed to protect the rights and liberties of the people in many situations. Although Supreme Court cases such as 'Texas v. Johnson' explain otherwise, overall the evidence presented suggests a Bill of Rights to be insufficient. Society and life in general is always changing; therefore a Bill of Rights would restrain development in certain areas. With such strong evidence against a Bill of Rights alone, it is appropriate to look to other methods of protecting rights and liberties, such as the UK 'Humans Rights Act' and also the 'EU Court of Human Rights,' that can sit alongside a Bill of Rights to ensure that the rights and liberties of the people are protected. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

    This shows the Supreme Court protecting the 1st Amendment - the freedom of press thus protecting civil liberties. The constitution is only partially successful in protecting civil liberties. Although I have shown that the constitution is often extraordinarily able regarding the civil liberties of American citizens, it is infinitely less

  2. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    Interest groups supporting those without representation have certainly had their successes; pressure groups can have a major impact on issues. The NAACP used its money and professional expertise to bring cases to court for people who could not otherwise afford it.

  1. To what extend are rights and liberties better protected in theory than in practice ...

    They would only have rights in theory, but not in practice. Only 'equality of results' would truly deliver equality for racial and ethnic minorities. Hence, the affirmative action programmes were introduced. This entails giving the members of a previously disadvantage minority group a head start in such areas as higher education and employment.

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    There have been endeavours to make a slight change, however there is an underlying reluctance to move away from constitutional principles which aid a strong executive, and that is what the present Labour administration maintains. It is unlikely a new constitution would be adopted that would debilitate Labour's present position.

  1. Are Civil Liberties and rights better Protected In the US or UK?

    Court similar to that with the Crown Court to the European Court of justice. This has shown can be said that the smaller courts are just minnows in which they are heard but not listened to as they don?t have the concluding decision if someone has done something right or

  2. Ethnic minorities in the USA

    confirmed) by the Senate. The election system also checks the power of the President as he or she can only be elected for two terms (2 x 4 years). The election system also means the make up of Congress can change which in turn affects how much support the President can count on.

  1. How effective has the US been at defending civil liberties at a time of ...

    They argue that the constitution is too flexible and complain that it has allowed the government, especially the executive branch, to use periods of crisis to steadily undermine those mechanisms in the constitution which protect liberty, which should protect citizens from the accumulation of power by the national government.

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    In terms of real growth, the United States has experienced positive growth of GDP, as a percentage, every year with the exception of the short recession in 1991 and the current economic downturn. This growth, on average, has been higher than the per cent growth for industrialised nations worldwide.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work