• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the co-existence of these routes to success suggest a 'well-ordered society' and are either based on considerations of fairness?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the last eighteen months, two prime-time television shows have screened national competitions in which the winners rise to fame and fortune as pop stars. In the same period, the government has continued to plan for the expansion of university education and exhorted students to equip themselves with the skills that will enable them to work in rewarding careers. Does the co-existence of these routes to success suggest a 'well-ordered society' and are either based on considerations of fairness? At first glance it seemed there could be only one logical answer to the question in that only by the existence of such different routes to success as stated in the question could it be a well-ordered society. The fact that individuals who are not academically intelligent can pursue other talents resulting in rewarding careers can only be seen as 'fair'. However, the debate is not as simplistic as it may first appear. Various questions can be uncovered when debating such an issue. For example can it be considered fair that winning a competition reaps the same kind of benefits as working for a place at university and studying for a degree? Can it be a well-ordered society when success through a competition can provide greater rewards than could be attained through achieving a successful degree? Does it make for a well-ordered society that both opportunities are made available to the individual? ...read more.

Middle

80). Dworkin posits, "that political decisions must be as far as possible independent of conceptions of the good life. Since citizens of a society differ in these conceptions, the government does not treat them as equals if it prefers one conception to another". Taking this theory into account it should therefore be considered fair that different types of people are able to attempt to gain rewarding careers in different fields. The question of human nature and the ultimate attainment of goals by the individual is discussed further by Rawls in his book 'A Theory of Justice'. His theory of primary goods and the original posititon became especially relevant. According to Rawls, it is possible to define a set of primary goods that are desired by everyone irrespective of whatever their own perception of good may be, and is independent of any particular assumptions about human nature. Rawls uses a device called the 'thin' theory of the good to explain these issues. Firstly, he assumes that all rational persons have 'thick' or developed theories of good. That is, they have a plan of life, an idea of what they would like to be or what they would like to achieve in life, and of their own personality and purposes. Such theories describes the conditions in which would allow us to flourish and meet our own ends. ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet in modern democratic society a plurality of incompatible and irreconcilable doctrines - religious, philosophical, and moral - coexist within the framework of democratic institutions. Indeed, free institutions themselves encourage this plurality of doctrines as the normal outgrowth of freedom over time. Recognizing this as a permanent condition of democracy, Rawls therefore asks, how can a stable and just society of free and equal citizens live in concord when deeply divided by these reasonable, but incompatible, doctrines? His answer is based on a redefinition of a "well-ordered society." It is no longer a society united in its basic moral beliefs but in its political conception of justice, and this justice is the focus of an overlapping consensus of reasonable comprehensive doctrines. Justice as fairness is now presented as an example of such a political conception; that it can be the focus of an overlapping consensus means that it can be endorsed by the main religious, philosophical, and moral doctrines that endure over time in a well-ordered society. Such a consensus, Rawls believes, represents the most likely basis of society unity available in a constitutional democratic regime. Were it achieved, it would extend and complete the movement of thought that began three centuries ago with the gradual if reluctant acceptance of the principle of toleration. This process would end with the full acceptance and understanding of modern liberties. 1 Plant, 1999, p. 98-99 2 Plant, 1999, p. 96 Modern Political Concepts - EUB304 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What is liberal about John Rawls Theory of Justice? How may it be criticised?

    This idea could be linked to the ideology behind welfare liberalism - part of the reason that it emerged was due to the widening class divides and the moral duty to help the less well off in society. The first principle of justice is undoubtedly liberal as it emphasises the

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    There are also mental harms which are included (e.g., you threatening me, or you excessively harassing me), but the standard is very strict in this area and the presumption is that a mental harm does not constitute a real instance of harm to others (e.g., I am offended by your joke, or I am disgusted by your style of dress).

  1. Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism ...

    the system before the theory of meritocracy should be applied and that social inequality should exist only if it works to the benefit of the poorest members of society. In contrast to classical liberals, modern liberal thinkers believe capitalism only worsened class inequalities within society.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    This right comes directly from God, because it is a God given right that a man should gain property through labor. This also sets the tone of the role of government, that of servitude instead of command. Locke believed that civil society existed to free individuals from the insecurity of the state of nature.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    more violent the more powerful the means of production already invented are. The division of labor and the application of machinery will therefore take a fresh start, and upon an even greater scale. Whatever be the power of the means of production which are employed, competition seeks to rob capital

  2. America Liberalism

    stage for the train of thought that passes through the American colonies. However other writers such as John Winthrop also make points that break down the idea of liberty and rights. "In his speech 'A Little Speech on Liberty', he distinguishes between natural and civil liberty" (American Political Thinking).

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Gortner et al. (1987) lamented that theories of the organization 'simply do not deal with the issue of politics, and . . . [that these theories] interpret power as an internal phenomenon usually related to the area of leadership' (p.

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    sovereignty was the idea that there is a final and absolute political authority in the political community...and no final and absolute authority exists elsewhere". * Michael Walzer (in Nossal 1998:206) points out that a "sovereign state is first and foremost an idea, a way of conceiving how to organise political

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work