• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the history of and different types of Anarchism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Anarchism Introduction The word ?anarchy? comes from Greek and literally means ?without rule?. The term has been in use since the French Revolution. It was used to describe a breakdown of order. This remains the case today. The word only acquired positive associations when Pierre-Joseph Proudhon declared in his book What is Property?, published in 1840: ?I am an anarchist?. Anarchists advocate the abolition of law and government in the belief that a more natural social order will develop. Some anarchists have supported violence to bring an end to the existing social order but most reject this. The first thinker associated with anarchism is William Godwin, author of An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, published in 1793. Godwin himself would have rejected the label ?anarchist?. During the 19th Century, anarchism came to constitute a key element of the emerging socialist movement. In 1864, the followers of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon joined with the followers of Karl Marx to set up the International Working Men?s Association or First International. The International collapsed in 1871 on account of growing antagonism between Marxists and anarchists, led by Michael Bakunin. In the late 19th Century, anarchists sought support from the landless peasants of Russia and southern Europe. Through the anarcho-syndicalist movement, they made a bid for support among the urban proletariat. Syndicalism was a form of revolutionary trade unionism. ...read more.

Middle

Both collectivist and individualist anarchists were strongly opposed to the mixed economies of the post-1945 era. Collectivist anarchists saw state intervention in the economy as an attempt to give capitalism a human face. Individualist anarchists saw it as distorting the market by creating monopolies. Both collectivist and individualist anarchists were equally opposed to Soviet-style state socialism. For individualist anarchists, this was an offence against property rights and individual freedom. For collectivist anarchists, the state simply replaced the capitalist class as the source of exploitation. Collectivist anarchism The philosophical roots of collectivist anarchism lie in socialism. Collectivism is the belief that human beings are sociable ? better suited to working together for the common good than striving for individual self-interest. People have no need to be regulated by government. In the words of Michael Bakunin: ?social solidarity is the first human law; freedom is the second law?. There is a clear overlap between collectivist anarchism and Marxism in terms of the rejection of capitalism and the need for revolution to bring about change. Both collectivist anarchists and Marxists believe that a fully communist society will be anarchic. Marx referred to the ?withering away? of the state. There are nevertheless fundamental differences between the two systems of thought. They centre on differing conceptions of the transition from capitalism to communism. Marx called for a ?dictatorship of the proletariat? to guard against the danger of bourgeois counter-revolution following a proletarian revolution and prior to the establishment of full communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The same might be said for the Populists in Tsarist Russia, and for Zapata in Mexico. At this time, anarchists carried out assassinations. Prominent victims were Tsar Alexander II, assassinated in 1881 by a group known as ?The People?s Will?. King Humbert of Italy and Empress Elizabeth of Austria were also assassinated, as was President Carnot of France and President McKinley of the United States. Anarchist violence resurfaced in the 1970s with the activities of Baader-Meinhof in West Germany, the Red Brigades in Italy, the Red Army in Japan and the Angry Brigade in Britain. Anarchists see violence as an acceptable form of retaliation against political oppression. In Italy, the Red Brigades set up ?people?s courts? and held ?proletarian trials? before assassinating their victims. Violence is also seen as a way of demoralising the ruling classes and raising the political consciousness of the masses. In practice, political violence has tended to provoke public horror and outrage and states have responded by extending their repressive machinery, usually with public support. Direct action This is employed by the modern anti-globalisation or anti-corporate movement. An example of direct action is the protest camp outside St. Paul?s Cathedral in London in 2011 and 2012. Anarchism in the 21st Century Anarchism has had a powerful influence on both the Right and the Left in recent decades and has made a powerful stand in its own right on such contemporary issues as pollution, environmental destruction, consumerism, urban development, gender relations and global poverty, which largely cut across the conventional political divide. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Ethos, Pathos & Logos in Dr. Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

    By comparing the situation of Hungarian freedom fighters, Dr. King hopes that the reasoning for his position will be seen, thereby convincing readers that his actions are logical, appropriate and righteous.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    In the public sector, double-loop learning is even more impeded and therefore rarer than in the private sphere. The reason is that politics, in both the organizational environment and political organizations, actually infuses every aspect of what public-sector organizations are and what they do.

  1. Free essay

    The emerge of Alliance 90

    Both symbolic and descriptive representations are grouped into representation as 'standing for'. This notion indicates that no action, but certain characteristics are needed in order to constitute a representational relationship. 4. Representing as 'acting for': In this sense, "representation is a certain characteristic activity, defined by certain behavioral norms or

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Have you ever known any rank and file workers who could retire from employment at the age of 50 and live on the money earned by them as wage workers. 80. How many years can a worker of average health be employed in your trade?

  1. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    They do forget however that what might be in someone's good interest may collide with someone else's interest, and since there is no authority they would have to sort it out between themselves and in many cases this would undoubtedly end with violence.

  2. Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

    In the following paragraphs, I will proceed to show the differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism. 21st century religious fundamentalism does not contain elements of racism, anti-semitism or the belief in the possibility of a master race.

  1. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    Dreyfus' imprisonment was a necessity in order to protect the security of France. When Zola's letter was published, and he accused the army of attempting to pervert the course of justice, doubts about the Army, which had been stagnant, were revived by those on the left of the political spectrum.26

  2. How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

    However Luther fundamentally respects the role of all powers and authorities and believes that it is a biblical principle to respect, acknowledge, follow and obey all secular rulers. Christians therefore cannot claim to only follow Christ and disobey secular authorities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work