• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How and to what extent has modern liberalism departed from the ideas of classical liberalism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How and to what extent has modern liberalism departed from the ideas of classical liberalism? Modern liberalism has made several significant departures from classical liberalism, most significantly resulting from their different views on what exactly constitutes freedom. Whereas classical liberals such as Adam Smith and John Locke believed in negative freedom - the freedom of interference by others, modern liberals see freedom as positive - the right of accessing the opportunities and resources needed to fulfil ones potential. It is from this key ideological difference that other differences arise. Perhaps the most significant departure from classical liberalism that this has resulted in is the Modern liberals' perception of the state. Traditionally, Liberals have been very suspicious of the state as a body with the potential to limit personal freedom, and therefore something to be treated with caution. Locke famously stated that the state lay "within the realm of coercion", prompting Liberals to be wary of state interference and seeing its role as to protect the individual from having their freedom impinged upon by others, rather than to interfere with positive aims. ...read more.

Middle

In modern liberalism, this original economic idea is still present, but it has developed into one with more restrictions in order to benefit the greater number of people. The idea of a free market are still supported, but with careful management in place to ensure protection for both workers and consumers. Furthermore, they believe that some essential sectors of the economy should be state managed, in contrast to Classical liberals' belief that the economy should be 100% based on private enterprise. Healthcare and education are two key areas that modern liberals have singled out as being important for the state to control, in order to ensure that levels of provision are equal and that people have the freedom to self-fulfilment; again linking back to their strong commitment to positive freedom as opposed to classical liberalism's negative freedom. Furthermore, modern liberals believe that taxes should be levied and regulation implemented across the economy again to aid the provision of certain state services and protect the consumer, something that has become known as Keynesianism after the modern liberal economist J.M. ...read more.

Conclusion

T.H. Green, a modern liberal thinker, believed that Liberty was only attainable in favourable economic circumstances, and this necessitated some form of help to be given to those in need in order for them to be free, and modern liberals see welfare as a 'hand up, not a hand out'. This clearly represents a significant departure from Classical liberalism. Over the years, modern liberalism has departed from classical liberalism to a large extent. Their fundamental difference in what constitutes freedom - Classical liberals and negative freedom, the belief that freedom constitutes protection from exterior limits to individual liberty, and Modern liberals who believe in positive freedom, that liberty constitutes the opportunity to realise ones potential to its full extent - have lead modern liberals to depart quite significantly from the classical philosophy. They have rejected the ideas of a limited state and embraced the concept of welfare and social justice as well as imposing regulation and limits on the economy with the aim of securing individual liberty via 'positive', rather than classical liberalism's 'negative' liberal policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

5 Stars - A very strong essay. The structure and technique is excellent - the points are logically linked together, and the argument is constantly reiterated and re-evaluated before the conclusion is skillfully reached. subject knowledge and understanding is strong, with quotes and supporting material well selected and applied. The essay is also clearly and articulately expressed.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. An essay on David Ricardo's Major Contribution to Economics

    In this essay Ricardo introduced his theory of distribution, applicable to the corn market and expanded on the law of diminishing returns, as previously mention by writers such as John Locke. Ricardo in this paper was a great advocate of laissez-faire economics.

  2. Useing decision maths to help me find out what I have to do in ...

    Below is a table of how many workers each activity will need... Activity A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Workers 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 4 1 3 3 2 1 Using this table I will now

  1. Analyse the main differences between Liberal and Marxist ideology

    individuals survive more successfully if they associate with other individuals to form alliances and relationships beneficial to survival. Economically, individuals need to trade and do business with each other to obtain all the goods they require, and this cannot be achieved autonomously.

  2. Why did Marx Criticise Liberal Democracy?

    example the establishment of it in the first place after the war and the triumph over communism in the cold war. Now, there are no obstacles for a modern capitalist liberal democracy. If 'all men are created equal' then each individual should have equal opportunity to develop their talents and be equal before the law.

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    national level), and managed to conceptualise power in terms of "decision making". He concluded, "those who have power are those who either make or break decisions"2. As Lukes declares "[The] one-dimensional, view of power involves a focus on behaviour in the making of decisions over key or important issues as

  2. What are the main advantages and limitations of the trait and type approaches to ...

    Additionally, the fewer traits we define, the more generalized we shall have to be, so the typical test, such as 16-personality factor test, will have certain limitations in meeting the predictive aim of psychology as a science. In other words, whenever a prediction is made, it will always a wide range of probability.

  1. Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty.

    In contrast, positive liberty is self mastery or self - realisation; the ability to control ones own life and develop personal autonomy. This concept sees liberty as the presence of control on a person - freedom means self determination and control of ones own destiny and interests.

  2. To what extent do the similarities between Classical Liberals and Modern Liberals outweigh the ...

    On the other hand, modern liberals also want to allow humans to flourish and realise their potential, but they believe that if there is inequality in society, the disadvantaged, with fewer opportunities will be unable to achieve this, so it is the duty of the state to intervene and give them the means to realise their potential (positive freedom).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work