• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Dominant Is the Prime Minister within the British system of Government?

Extracts from this document...


How Dominant Is the Prime Minister within the British system of Government? The main theme of this essay concerns the Prime Minister and Cabinet, how dominant the role of Prime Minister is, also the extent of their power. To begin with, this essay will explain what the core executive consists of, what the position of the Prime Minister has come to stand for, in addition the responsibilities of that particular role. In the second place, this essay will look at the part Prime Minister's have played in the Civil Service and the changes, which have taken place in this area over the decades. The next point will describe and compare the leadership styles of some of the Prime Ministers in the twentieth century to the present Leader Tony Blair. The next area this essay will cover are the decisions Prime Ministers have made historically in shaping policy, their additional powers, also how this has led sometimes to their ultimate downfall. Their unique responsibilities will also be illustrated. The next area of this essay will explain the cabinet support, why this is essential for the Prime Minister, interpersonal relationships within cabinet, and the reasons why the PM is most popular after an election victory, then, describing observer's viewpoints of Tony Blair being more presidential and comparing this with past prime ministers. ...read more.


Thatcher is renowned to having a dominant style in which she had a direct approach, whilst political writer Martin J Smith described her style as being autocratic. Wilson, in contrast even though a good communicator, was normally keen to get popular agreement within the party, to impose his personality on a particular area of policy. Generally, the prime minister consults with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and treasury before economic, foreign policy initiatives are made, however the ultimate decisions are made by the PM who is vital in determining policy. Over the past forty years in the UK, prime ministers had to play an important part in various initiatives such as, industrial trade unions and issues in Northern Ireland. PM's on the other hand might delve into areas that they passionately believe in, which might sometimes risk upsetting other ministers. James Callaghan the PM during the late seventies intervened in educational and health matters, while Margaret Thatcher bought in the poll tax, Tony Blair on his thinking put into operation the millennium dome, had a keen interest in law and order and supported President Bush in the Iraq war. ...read more.


Even though Tony Blair's style is more of a superior figure, who makes executive decisions which he feels is best for the country regardless of what the majority of cabinet might think. Prime Ministers are clearly in a powerful position of authority; however, ministers are also in a strong position of the heads of departments, as these departments play an integral role in central government. Various observers have described the present Prime Minister leadership as being presidential. If Blair is viewed as more presidential than some of the past Prime Ministers like Major, or Douglas-Home, maybe the contrast is not as significant when compared to leaders in the vein of Lloyd George, Churchill and Thatcher. Generally, Prime Ministers are in a strong confident position when things are going well, more presidential in periods of war, (Coxall, Robins and Leach,2003:200). The final analysis On the Prime Minister is that they have around them ministers who have needs of looking after what is best for their department and themselves. The quest of self-interest can weaken the combined ambitions of government and the role of the PM; the task of the prime minister therefore is to act as an entrepreneur who gives support and benefits to ministers in return for their support, which is important. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Leadership styles

    3 star(s)

    * Team members may not get job satisfaction because of the reward and punishment ethos. * There is a clear chain of command. * It has serious limitations for knowledge-based or creative work but remains a common style in so many organisations. * Formal systems of discipline are in place.

  2. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    The President is aware that members of Congress often have their own interests as regards legislation, and therefore compromise is often the key to Presidential success. The individual wishes of Congressmen, it would therefore appear, are influential in the passing of legislation.

  1. Compare and contrast the position and powers of the US president and the UK ...

    In fact, in recent years the European Union has done little if anything to impact on important British legislation. It has intervened on issues that involve a few such as the sentencing of the Jamie Bulger murderers. But with the fear of encroaching federalism seemingly strong throughout Europe, it seems

  2. Free essay

    Identify and Discuss the Role of Prime Minister, Giving Specific Examples within the British ...

    One major criticism of the use of Royal Prerogative is that in 2003 Tony Blair could have taken the UK to war with Iraq without having the support of the House of Commons by invoking the Royal Prerogative. "In July 2007 the Government published wide-reaching proposals for constitutional reform.

  1. To what extent has the Prime Minister become Presidential?

    This is of course undermining the Cabinet. He ensures that all departments are in agreement and follow his line. Blair has downgraded the Cabinet and is increasingly centralising power around his office to an even greater extent than that of Thatcher.

  2. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    system and the use of the Whips is in effect a guarantee of legislative success, especially true with the current Blair government which holds a massive majority in parliament, so much so that even legislation which faces much opposition from within can pass with ease.

  1. Free essay

    Compare and Contrast the different styles of recent British Prime Ministers.

    However, Thatcher supported monetarist in inflation was declined in 1982 and the recapture of the Falklands Wars lead to good opinion poll rates in 1983 after the Miners Strike. After this elections, she felt secure to get ride of the 'wet' in the cabinet and against entry in to the

  2. Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The ...

    In practice the choice of elevating members of the Lords or Commons to cabinet rank is limited as senior colleagues can hardly be omitted without causing dissension. The Prime Minister's power of dismissal is not so simple as dismissal may often be viewed as a weakness of the Prime Minister and could work against him or her.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work