• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what sense(s) can liberalism be regarded as individualistic? Should individualism be regarded as a strength or weakness of liberalism?

Extracts from this document...


In what sense(s) can liberalism be regarded as individualistic? Should individualism be regarded as a strength or weakness of liberalism? Ever since the creation of liberalism, definitions and values have been ever changing. Indeed, different countries can change the understanding of liberalism. In Britain, liberalism has centred on religious toleration, government by consent and personal/ economic freedom. On the other hand, traditional French liberalism has been associated with secularism and democracy. With this in mind, the issue over liberalism makes for a somewhat high level of debate. However, looking beyond all the variables of liberalism, the theory of individualism appears to be ever present. This is why liberalism can be regarded as individualistic. Perhaps the main argument over liberalism being individualistic, is whether or not, this is a strength or a weakness. "At the philosophical level, liberals have affirmed a commitment to the concepts of equality, liberty, individuality and rationality."1 This statement from Eatwell and Wright conveys that individualism is a key concept in regards to liberalism. Defining liberalism is perhaps the best way in which to regard it as individualistic. ...read more.


At the heart of such liberty is the absence of coercion by others which insures that citizens do not interfere with each other without compelling justification. Perhaps the main argument for individualism stems from the fact that it allows humans to progress and in turn, help society to progress. Individual liberty entails that a person has the right to free speech. This single fact is of massive importance as it means that democracy can be practised to its maximum potential, which the western world strives for. Without individual liberty, the right to free speech would have not been allowed from many angles. Free speech accounts for many inequalities which have been reversed with examples including racial equality, demonstrated in the fall of Apartheid. Homosexuals are now allowed to practise their ideals to certain degrees and have become accepted by many individuals of society. Religious toleration is far more evident with people of various religions practising their religion in different cultures. All of these factors have come about through individuals practising their individual liberty with the exclusion of coercion from others. Furthermore, individualism realise their maximum potential and maximum performance. ...read more.


Whether it be different liberalism based on historical or cultural differences of liberalism, the key value looks to the protection of the individual's liberty in society. In other words, it concentrates more on the primacy of the individual rather than the primacy of society. The debate over individualism being a strength or weakness of liberalism is a far more speculative issue. There are many arguments which support either claim with a decision somewhat difficult to determine. The western or developed world prides itself on its democratic systems, which have stemmed primarily from the liberal ideology. This argument, backed up by other claims such as such as the improvement in equality would more than often close the case on the debate, however, the negative factors of individualism cannot be overlooked. This is particularly true on the basis that the individual liberties which liberalism presents, can only be used in a rational manner. In other words, it does not apply to certain degree of society. Upon final assessment, individualism slightly sways in the direction of being a strength of liberalism after closely weighing the positives against the negatives. However, through different interpretation, this analysis could easily be contradicted. 1 Eatwell and Wright, 1999, Pg 24 2 Locke, 1960, Pg 287 3 Berlin, 1969, Pg 122 4 Goodwin, 1997, Pg53 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Since the land left in the common, land that nobody uses is like wasting. He (1688) says that land that is worked on and some gain comes from it is "ten times more than those which are yielded by an acre of land of an equal richness lying waste in common" (p.

  2. Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

    do not try to abolish it but see their job as limiting, dividing up and controlling power and preserving the chance of replacing those in power. Liberalism and democracy happily coexist in many countries. Although Liberalism is closely associated with the modern development of democracy and democratic institutions, there have been a number of problems in its relationship with democracy.

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    (The classic modern example of paternalistic legislation is seat belt laws, though it is unclear whether this involves a tyranny of the majority. I also don't mean to imply that this is the best example to use when arguing Mill, it is probably quite a bad example because many people are sympathetic to seat belt laws.)

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    This managed to free the US and the UK from their economic problems in a movement known as the New Right. Also, if there is an area of high unemployment, the corporation will see that situation as a cheap labour pool and will set up operations to exploit this.

  1. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    For early liberals, liberty was a natural right, an essential requirement for leading a truly human existence. It also gave individuals the opportunity to pursue there own interests by exercising choice - The choice of where to live, what to buy and who to work for etc Later liberals have

  2. What was "New" about "New Liberalism"?

    He therefore argued for a society of which success should not be measured by the highest achievers, but by the lowest. It was the duty of the state to provide help for those people. It is argued by Potter however that "in the Edwardian period, Liberalism underwent a change of emphasis rather than of aims."

  1. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    reduction in rents and land values which had led to the impoverishment of many small land owners and farmers. This deterioration was blamed upon Disraeli and his economic policies - perhaps a little unfairly. In reality there was a significant change in the industrial and commercial sectors due to foreign

  2. Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism ...

    idea about what individual freedom and equality should entail, in comparison with a modern liberal. "Many of the disagreements within liberal ideology can be traced back to these rival ideas of uniqueness and equality3". According to classical liberals freedom is the absence of restrictions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work