• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the EU a federal state?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the EU a federal state? The main objectives of this paper are three: trace out the differences between federalists and intergovernmentalist in the building of the Union; find out, by looking at other federations, what makes a state federal, and then conclude whether the EU is presently, or moving towards to, a federal state. Federation - the ultimate peace treaty Proposals for a federalist unification of Europe came already in the 18th century. For Immanuel Kant, the federation was a means of achieving a perpetual peace. He saw the solution to trouble not in treaties but in a federation of peoples. Treaties were meant to be discarded. This federation, he argued has no aim to acquire any power like that of a state, but merely to preserve and sevure the freedom of each state in itself. This is, I think what brought the first efforts towards European Integration in the post-war period. For Winston Churchill, the United States of Europe would ensure peace, safety and freedom. The main thought behind Monnet's and Schumann's proposals for integration had as their main aim the control of Germany. ...read more.

Middle

Regarding the third federal principle, there is no division of the legislature. Infact there is no upper house representing the Member States. True, there is the Council of ministers, but that is an executive body which meets in private and thus it cannot be compared to a legislative body which engages in public debates. In the United States the Senate has always played a very important role as the representative of the states, which are unequal in population. Eight American states which together have a population of about five million elect 16 senators, while California with 31 million has only two, just as the small states. This is not the same for all federations. In Germany the larger lander return more members to the Bundersrat. This division of the legislature into two roughly equal chambers does not apply yet for the EU. The European Union has lots of executive bodies but then it is weak on the legislative side. It has whay many observers called a "democratic deficit" (verney). In the American system of government, there is an upper house (Senate) to represent the people of the various regions. ...read more.

Conclusion

3 federal law should constitue a separte legal system Federal law should constitue a sperate legal system which is different from both state and international law. Therefore no state legislature can amend Comminity law and therefore it is an indipendent legal system. 4 community law must be supreme over national law In the United States and Canada this is ensured by specific clauses in the Constituons. The Community Treties contain no such clause and one cannot state that the framers of the treties intended them to be supreme. However this has been achieved through case law. In the case Costa v Enel the ECJ stated that 'any provision of Comm law whether contained in the treaties or in community legislation, prevails over any provision of the law of the MS, and also of Constitutions. The European Court is in a waker positon only due to the fact that there is no right of appeal from a state court to the ECY. It can only make a reference. This differs from appealing. The European Court only decided questions of communiry law. It does not decide the case. The final judgment must always come from the MS coourt. This leads to 2 problems. The MS court may refuse to make a reference or it may refuse the judgement by the ECJ. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Are supreme court justices politicians in disguise?

    4 star(s)

    The 5-4 split decision suggested that Bush v. Gore was a political, not a judicial, decision. In a sense, the justices had no choice to make it. When the contest between Bush and Gore proved too close to call, the contestants resorted to a series of lawsuits in an effort to settle the matter.

  2. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    students in school and that there could be no restrictions placed on these students' protests as it did not cause undue interruptions of school activities. It is clear that although these rights were created over two hundred years ago, they are still as significant and valuable to the US citizens today as they were then.

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    with the rule of law, while the executive branch requires discretionary interpretation because of its need for immediate reaction. The Hamdi case indicates recourse is available to detainees. The officer in Iraq essentially turned himself in and accepted military justice after he shot the gun off near the detainee's head.

  2. A Passage of a Bill Through the American and Canadian Governments

    The Rules Committee schedules the law-child for the second reading once the House of Representative's committee returns it to the legislature. If the bill survives the second reading, which includes debate and voting on the floor of the House,

  1. Is the USA still a federal state?

    One may identify that Obama?s presidency too reflected the growing strength of the federal government. The first year of the president?s terms witnessed the proliferation of a stimulus package through the passing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The $787 billion invested to the programme which later grew to

  2. '9 politicians sitting on a bench.' Critically evaluate this description of the US Supreme ...

    as ?politicians sitting on a bench.? However the opportunity still existed for the court to find it unconstitutional, and in Citizens united v Federal Election Commission (2010), it found provisions of the 2002 McCain-Feingold Campaign finance legislation as unconstitutional.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    At least the US Supreme court may triumphantly declare how ethnically diverse it is, which may influence how representative the court is in conveying an appreciation of the law. However one has to determine how genuine these appointments are. Is ethnicity being considered for the sake of ethnicity or for politics?

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    with a religion steps into legal matters, specifically to prevent someone from getting the same rights as themselves, not only is it wrong but it also contradicts the secularist system. Proposition eight was an amendment to California's constitution making same-sex marriage illegal after it had previously been legalized.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work