• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this and what are its implications.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this and what are its implications. The above statement was written by a liberal called Lord Acton, he is what is commonly called a classical liberal. Classical liberalism was pre-Twentieth century liberalism, before it was revised because of the progress in industrialisation. However, the consistent central theme of liberalism in both forms (classical and modern) is individualism. Classical liberals see humans as being selfish and egoistical beings, as opposed to the modern liberal thought that humans are altruistic. Therefore modern liberals have a much more optimistic view of human beings compared to that of classical liberals. As I have stated above Lord Acton as a classical liberal believed humans to be egoistical, and as such thought that if beings got in to a position of power and authority then the government would be tyrannical. ...read more.

Middle

Also, JS Mill thought political wisdom was unequally distributed and mainly related to education, and that the uneducated masses may act according to narrow class interest rather than for the good of others. However, modern liberals see democracy as a virtue this is because protective democracy checks the power of the government and advanced individual interests. Active participation of the population in a democracy advances the education of citizens and allows them to fulfil their potential. Moreover, they believe that democracy creates a consensus and maintains equilibrium within complex and fluid modern societies. Liberals believe in liberal-democratic political systems, there are two elements evident in these systems; the liberal part means the belief in limited government power, and the democratic part means that government should be sensitive to the needs of the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Then this in turn would lead to tyrannical governments such as those of; Hussein, Mugabe and Stalin. The implications of liberals believing in this statement are that they believe that rational individuals should want to sign up to a social contract to establish a sovereign government. Individuals would want to do this because life before government was endless civil war, with life being; solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. Life would be this way because individuals are selfish, greedy and power seeking. Therefore rational beings would enter into a social contract and sacrifice a portion of their liberty to set up a system of law; this would prevent the otherwise inevitable: property and lives being under constant threat. Seventeenth century writer John Locke said "Where there is no law there is no freedom." Thomas Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    to prove the existence of homo monstrous as a lesser species, was under threat. As the colonial period wore on, the amount of 'educated others' began to undercut the whole civilised/uncivilised binary - the latent ideology of all western discourse about the colonies - and what emerged was a growing 'contact zone.'

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    There is also the more modern legal classification of some speech as hate speech, and Mill would probably not support the protection of this kind of speech - but I am not at all clear on what the criteria for hate speech is.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    But unquestionably all of these elements are a precursor to Locke's Raison D'Etre of government, "The great and chief end, therefore of man's uniting into commonwealths and putting themselves under civil government is the preservation of their property." For Locke, natural law, or law in the state of nature, begins and ends with the natural right of property.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    those groups that represents the individual&rsquos political beliefs, can be transferred to the behavior of providing money to groups that best represent his or her economic interests, and that is where the connection is made, and where democracy and capitalism intertwine with each other(Pious 12).

  1. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    However Mill did impose any restrictions on the individual that were designed to prevent a person from damaging themselves, either physically or morally. 'self-regarding' actions and 'other-regarding actions' can be seen as vague, and ambiguous. As a person going to a shop and buying a packet of crisps can be

  2. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    freedom of the individual whilst conforming to free trade and cheap governance: the state would enable, but not provide; mediate, not dictate. This, Gladstone felt morally obliged to uphold, particularly following the death of Peel (his political mentor) in 1850.

  1. Why Do Liberals Place Such Importance On The Concept Of Liberty?

    p.12). He thought that the monarchy was a repressive institution and people would be best in control of their lives in a democratic society. This could be done by frequent elections taking place so that, if the present government was not performing well, a new one could be brought in.

  2. A Report Outlining the Basic Features Of Liberal-Democratic Government.

    Nevertheless, we do not have a written constitution, and neither do we have a formal bill of rights. Parliament can effectively make any law granting, reducing or removing rights, and there is no system of judicial review whereby the courts can declare its Acts unconstitutional.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work