• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this and what are its implications.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this and what are its implications. The above statement was written by a liberal called Lord Acton, he is what is commonly called a classical liberal. Classical liberalism was pre-Twentieth century liberalism, before it was revised because of the progress in industrialisation. However, the consistent central theme of liberalism in both forms (classical and modern) is individualism. Classical liberals see humans as being selfish and egoistical beings, as opposed to the modern liberal thought that humans are altruistic. Therefore modern liberals have a much more optimistic view of human beings compared to that of classical liberals. As I have stated above Lord Acton as a classical liberal believed humans to be egoistical, and as such thought that if beings got in to a position of power and authority then the government would be tyrannical. ...read more.

Middle

Also, JS Mill thought political wisdom was unequally distributed and mainly related to education, and that the uneducated masses may act according to narrow class interest rather than for the good of others. However, modern liberals see democracy as a virtue this is because protective democracy checks the power of the government and advanced individual interests. Active participation of the population in a democracy advances the education of citizens and allows them to fulfil their potential. Moreover, they believe that democracy creates a consensus and maintains equilibrium within complex and fluid modern societies. Liberals believe in liberal-democratic political systems, there are two elements evident in these systems; the liberal part means the belief in limited government power, and the democratic part means that government should be sensitive to the needs of the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Then this in turn would lead to tyrannical governments such as those of; Hussein, Mugabe and Stalin. The implications of liberals believing in this statement are that they believe that rational individuals should want to sign up to a social contract to establish a sovereign government. Individuals would want to do this because life before government was endless civil war, with life being; solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. Life would be this way because individuals are selfish, greedy and power seeking. Therefore rational beings would enter into a social contract and sacrifice a portion of their liberty to set up a system of law; this would prevent the otherwise inevitable: property and lives being under constant threat. Seventeenth century writer John Locke said "Where there is no law there is no freedom." Thomas Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    to prove the existence of homo monstrous as a lesser species, was under threat. As the colonial period wore on, the amount of 'educated others' began to undercut the whole civilised/uncivilised binary - the latent ideology of all western discourse about the colonies - and what emerged was a growing 'contact zone.'

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    Adam Smith was capitalist and believed the individual should be able to choose. Smith favoured a 'laisser-faire' market which translated meant a free market economy. Smith wanted minimal government interference, this meant getting rid of such things as apprenticeship rules, monopolies, tariffs and duties.

  1. Why Do Liberals Place Such Importance On The Concept Of Liberty?

    take care of themselves as the allocation and 'movement of goods, capital and labour' would level each other out (Adams, I. 2001. p.20). That is, industry would only make what the consumer wanted to buy, so the consumer would pay for it and industry could continue to provide more useful goods.

  2. Political Power

    Finally by comparing the decisions made and the actors' preferences, the power relationship can be revealed. In this sense power is understood as a concept which can be simplified and quantified. A clear example was shown in?Political Analysis?: Anna buys Ben's car for �500 which is actually worth �800 and both of them are aware of the real value.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    His ideas and theories permeate throughout many of the democratic world's constitutions. He authored many essays during his lifetime but one of the more famous ones was the Second Treatise on Government, attributed to him only after passing. This writing is concerned with individual man coming together into a political

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    They sentenced him to death and confiscated his property (Plutarch, p: 266). Here once again we witness the power of the popular courts in Athens and how the masses who inevitably decided on cases now had the authority once possessed only by the archons and the Areopagus.

  1. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    freedom of the individual whilst conforming to free trade and cheap governance: the state would enable, but not provide; mediate, not dictate. This, Gladstone felt morally obliged to uphold, particularly following the death of Peel (his political mentor) in 1850.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    d) Consenting adults: Lastly, if two (or more) people are engaging in an activity to which they both consent, then the activity should not be considered as involving harm to others even if the people are causing harm to each other. For example, if you and I agree to a boxing match, then the government should not forbid

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work