• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this and what are its implications.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this and what are its implications. The above statement was written by a liberal called Lord Acton, he is what is commonly called a classical liberal. Classical liberalism was pre-Twentieth century liberalism, before it was revised because of the progress in industrialisation. However, the consistent central theme of liberalism in both forms (classical and modern) is individualism. Classical liberals see humans as being selfish and egoistical beings, as opposed to the modern liberal thought that humans are altruistic. Therefore modern liberals have a much more optimistic view of human beings compared to that of classical liberals. As I have stated above Lord Acton as a classical liberal believed humans to be egoistical, and as such thought that if beings got in to a position of power and authority then the government would be tyrannical. ...read more.

Middle

Also, JS Mill thought political wisdom was unequally distributed and mainly related to education, and that the uneducated masses may act according to narrow class interest rather than for the good of others. However, modern liberals see democracy as a virtue this is because protective democracy checks the power of the government and advanced individual interests. Active participation of the population in a democracy advances the education of citizens and allows them to fulfil their potential. Moreover, they believe that democracy creates a consensus and maintains equilibrium within complex and fluid modern societies. Liberals believe in liberal-democratic political systems, there are two elements evident in these systems; the liberal part means the belief in limited government power, and the democratic part means that government should be sensitive to the needs of the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Then this in turn would lead to tyrannical governments such as those of; Hussein, Mugabe and Stalin. The implications of liberals believing in this statement are that they believe that rational individuals should want to sign up to a social contract to establish a sovereign government. Individuals would want to do this because life before government was endless civil war, with life being; solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. Life would be this way because individuals are selfish, greedy and power seeking. Therefore rational beings would enter into a social contract and sacrifice a portion of their liberty to set up a system of law; this would prevent the otherwise inevitable: property and lives being under constant threat. Seventeenth century writer John Locke said "Where there is no law there is no freedom." Thomas Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    to prove the existence of homo monstrous as a lesser species, was under threat. As the colonial period wore on, the amount of 'educated others' began to undercut the whole civilised/uncivilised binary - the latent ideology of all western discourse about the colonies - and what emerged was a growing 'contact zone.'

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Man had a natural right to that with which he mixed his labour. The fundamental idea behind this theory on private property was that by expending ones internal energy (owns labour power) upon something, that item became a part of oneself, or one's private property.

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    There is also the more modern legal classification of some speech as hate speech, and Mill would probably not support the protection of this kind of speech - but I am not at all clear on what the criteria for hate speech is.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    to be in place to have a democratic system of government, one must look at what capitalism provides to make a working democracy possible. One of the things that capitalism provides to make democracy possible is the affluence necessary maximize free time, or more specifically, to allow people to concentrate

  1. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    If a person were to commit suicide the person parents, grand-parents siblings, children, friends etc will be affected. Negative freedom is the absence of obstacles, barriers or constraints. The individual has negative freedom to the extent that actions are available to them in this negative sense.

  2. A Report Outlining the Basic Features Of Liberal-Democratic Government.

    Nevertheless, we do not have a written constitution, and neither do we have a formal bill of rights. Parliament can effectively make any law granting, reducing or removing rights, and there is no system of judicial review whereby the courts can declare its Acts unconstitutional.

  1. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    this sincerity as well as a change in his own personal beliefs that eventually led to the Liberal Reform Bill, 1866-7.4 The electoral success of the Liberals can certainly partly be attributed to Gladstone; however his achievements would be markedly less had there not been an entirely different and fresh party and political outlook within Britain.

  2. Why Do Liberals Place Such Importance On The Concept Of Liberty?

    p.12). He thought that the monarchy was a repressive institution and people would be best in control of their lives in a democratic society. This could be done by frequent elections taking place so that, if the present government was not performing well, a new one could be brought in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work