• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society" Many Socialists have believed that Socialism could only be introduced by overthrowing the current political system. Blanqui proposed to do it through a small band of conspirators. Marx and Engels however, saw a proletarian revolution in which the masses of the working class would overthrow the bourgeoisie. This view arose from a growing dislike of Capitalism; industrialization having produced an injustice geared towards the working classes with widespread poverty and unemployment. Moreover, the proletariat did not have a political voice to represent them, as the majority of workers could not vote. These socialists saw that the state in an effort to act in the favour of capital and negated the needs of the Labour. Thus, people like Marx said that revolution was unavoidable to instate Socialism. The context of these theories was unsettled with many discontent in the lower classes during the 19th century. ...read more.

Middle

Bernstein was one writer on this concept and argued this case by suggesting that the Capitalist Bourgeoisie's new adherence to democracy would open the door to socialist influence. He noted the appearance of new factory legislation, the freeing of trade unions and co-operative trading as well as standard conditions for Labour in the work place. He saw these as characteristics of change that would lead to continued evolution. The biggest problem with the socialist link to democracy was quite broadly; should socialists participate in Bourgeoisie governments and in doing so is it not giving a form of approval. Revolutionists tend to answer that it would. Early on there was no question; the Bourgeoisie was the enemy, however now evolutionary socialists are more often considered as being pragmatic in pressing forward their ideas. Literally, what ever ever works approach as opposed to a steadfast revolutionary option. ...read more.

Conclusion

Now, although not all socialists would agree, a lot are happy to play the system especially as the majority of concepts have been recognized as good and incorporated into the modern systems. The Socialist fight today is less war and violent revolt for the majority of socialists but a fight against the exceptional advance of capitalism. In modern times, the global market has come together and multi-national super companies have emerged. Socialists who are into direct action might protest against figureheads of this new super capitalism like the world trade organization or huge companies. Others, who are willing to use the democratic systems, might try to reduce it through pressure groups, Microsoft is currently being challenged and is an example of governments not destroying the huge companies but keeping them in check. A socialist today will still have strong arguments for change but maybe the majority will agree that no earth shattering change through revolt is needed in any real of immediacy, especially concerning countries in the E.U. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    Firstly at its base capitalism is a system of exploitation and oppression, which saw many of the working class being in stricken poverty and mass fear of unemployment, this virtually put any of the working class on the brink of revolution against the land and factory owners.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    An example of how this is applied in reality is in opposition to Berger&rsquos viewpoint that the best guarantor of human rights is democracy16. When one looks at the market economy, the cosmopolitan view seems to be one of giant coronations that tyrannize the people of that country in the

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This arrangement will encourage a required minimum amount of loyalty to the system (Hirschman 1970). Thus, in well-run public/political-sector organizations, those in power go to some pains to guarantee not only that minorities will be heard but also, and perhaps above all, that they will share in the distribution of privileges and benefits that the organization controls.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    Furthermore, the war exacerbated current problems whilst revealing the inadequacies of the existing regime and creating a host of new grievances. The war produced a large number of ex-soldiers who were ready recruits for new paramilitary organisations; in these circumstances, ideology was not requisite.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    If work takes place both night and day, what is the order of the shifts? 42. What is the usual lengthening of the working day in times of good trade? 43. Are the machines cleaned by workers specially hired for that purpose, or do the workers employed on these machines clean them free, during their working day?

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    include "a group around the elected governor of the region [most of whom have no party affiliation]; local resources, such as a major enterprise; or personal networks or wealth" (1). Undoubtedly, many viable candidates are local notables who find it easier to utilize these local resources, while at least some

  1. Critically Evaluate the Impact of Socialist Organisations and Ideas on the Early Labour Party.

    These men owed their positions to the Liberal party, who by agreement didn't field candidates in certain city centre constituencies. Consequently they had little independence, and as Engels commentated were little more then "the tail of the Great Liberal Party."

  2. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    Only a small number of workers would benefit with the revolution, the rest left to become the minority, the ?proles? who had no influence or power, by the early 1850?s, the Proletariat had become the largest growing class group in Europe, yet they still held the minority status.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work