• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society" Many Socialists have believed that Socialism could only be introduced by overthrowing the current political system. Blanqui proposed to do it through a small band of conspirators. Marx and Engels however, saw a proletarian revolution in which the masses of the working class would overthrow the bourgeoisie. This view arose from a growing dislike of Capitalism; industrialization having produced an injustice geared towards the working classes with widespread poverty and unemployment. Moreover, the proletariat did not have a political voice to represent them, as the majority of workers could not vote. These socialists saw that the state in an effort to act in the favour of capital and negated the needs of the Labour. Thus, people like Marx said that revolution was unavoidable to instate Socialism. The context of these theories was unsettled with many discontent in the lower classes during the 19th century. ...read more.

Middle

Bernstein was one writer on this concept and argued this case by suggesting that the Capitalist Bourgeoisie's new adherence to democracy would open the door to socialist influence. He noted the appearance of new factory legislation, the freeing of trade unions and co-operative trading as well as standard conditions for Labour in the work place. He saw these as characteristics of change that would lead to continued evolution. The biggest problem with the socialist link to democracy was quite broadly; should socialists participate in Bourgeoisie governments and in doing so is it not giving a form of approval. Revolutionists tend to answer that it would. Early on there was no question; the Bourgeoisie was the enemy, however now evolutionary socialists are more often considered as being pragmatic in pressing forward their ideas. Literally, what ever ever works approach as opposed to a steadfast revolutionary option. ...read more.

Conclusion

Now, although not all socialists would agree, a lot are happy to play the system especially as the majority of concepts have been recognized as good and incorporated into the modern systems. The Socialist fight today is less war and violent revolt for the majority of socialists but a fight against the exceptional advance of capitalism. In modern times, the global market has come together and multi-national super companies have emerged. Socialists who are into direct action might protest against figureheads of this new super capitalism like the world trade organization or huge companies. Others, who are willing to use the democratic systems, might try to reduce it through pressure groups, Microsoft is currently being challenged and is an example of governments not destroying the huge companies but keeping them in check. A socialist today will still have strong arguments for change but maybe the majority will agree that no earth shattering change through revolt is needed in any real of immediacy, especially concerning countries in the E.U. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    Firstly at its base capitalism is a system of exploitation and oppression, which saw many of the working class being in stricken poverty and mass fear of unemployment, this virtually put any of the working class on the brink of revolution against the land and factory owners.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    On the other side, we find Alquati and a few more (Soave and Gaparotto), who, based on factory experiences in the US and France, considered the inquiry as the basis for a political intervention oriented towards organising workers' antagonism. It was a considerable difference from the point of view of the concrete goals of the survey.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Instead, what appears is a party system disconnected from society because its component parties provide little accountability or true representation, a situation in which the electorate is susceptible to manipulation by populist senti mentalism. In other words, one of the important functions of a political party is to harness the

  2. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    the unprescriptable rights of liberty, security, property and resistance to oppression.? These were basic rights that every man should have, it is a kind of humanitarian ?communism? whereby everybody is equal as a man and everybody is equal in front of the law, regardless of wealth or status.

  1. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    and agricultural workers (peasantry), but, there was the real system of unwritten contracts in which the local bosses were in favour of self-government, this was known as the 'politics of the governors' Under this the local land owning elites chose the state governors, who in turn selected the president.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    It cannot be without negative consequences, either for the theory of organizational learning or for attempts to apply it in the workplace, that such organizations are almost never studied from the vantage point of power and of the competition that takes place to create and maintain control of it or

  1. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    in wars between Russia and France in which foreign governments appeared to threaten Germany as a whole. Therefore this, made many Germans who were normally content to think of themselves as Prussians, Bavarians, Hessians or members of other states discontented that Germany could not speak with a strong single voice

  2. To what extent does New Labour continue to embrace the beliefs and values of ...

    Perhaps the defeat of Callaghan's government marked the death of true socialism in the Labour Party. Thatcherism changed the Labour Party almost as much as it changed the Conservative Party. Worldwide the prospects for socialism became more problematic following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work