• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society" Many Socialists have believed that Socialism could only be introduced by overthrowing the current political system. Blanqui proposed to do it through a small band of conspirators. Marx and Engels however, saw a proletarian revolution in which the masses of the working class would overthrow the bourgeoisie. This view arose from a growing dislike of Capitalism; industrialization having produced an injustice geared towards the working classes with widespread poverty and unemployment. Moreover, the proletariat did not have a political voice to represent them, as the majority of workers could not vote. These socialists saw that the state in an effort to act in the favour of capital and negated the needs of the Labour. Thus, people like Marx said that revolution was unavoidable to instate Socialism. The context of these theories was unsettled with many discontent in the lower classes during the 19th century. ...read more.

Middle

Bernstein was one writer on this concept and argued this case by suggesting that the Capitalist Bourgeoisie's new adherence to democracy would open the door to socialist influence. He noted the appearance of new factory legislation, the freeing of trade unions and co-operative trading as well as standard conditions for Labour in the work place. He saw these as characteristics of change that would lead to continued evolution. The biggest problem with the socialist link to democracy was quite broadly; should socialists participate in Bourgeoisie governments and in doing so is it not giving a form of approval. Revolutionists tend to answer that it would. Early on there was no question; the Bourgeoisie was the enemy, however now evolutionary socialists are more often considered as being pragmatic in pressing forward their ideas. Literally, what ever ever works approach as opposed to a steadfast revolutionary option. ...read more.

Conclusion

Now, although not all socialists would agree, a lot are happy to play the system especially as the majority of concepts have been recognized as good and incorporated into the modern systems. The Socialist fight today is less war and violent revolt for the majority of socialists but a fight against the exceptional advance of capitalism. In modern times, the global market has come together and multi-national super companies have emerged. Socialists who are into direct action might protest against figureheads of this new super capitalism like the world trade organization or huge companies. Others, who are willing to use the democratic systems, might try to reduce it through pressure groups, Microsoft is currently being challenged and is an example of governments not destroying the huge companies but keeping them in check. A socialist today will still have strong arguments for change but maybe the majority will agree that no earth shattering change through revolt is needed in any real of immediacy, especially concerning countries in the E.U. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    The third problem carries some irony for the field of organizational learning. It is that the evaluation of programs, the search for additional information, may become a way of delaying the adoption of a policy or stopping it in its tracks at the implementation stage (Henry 1990: 122-4).

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    This is no way to run a democracy, because it detracts from the belief that democracy is the rule of the people. This in turn leads us away from the stipulated meaning of the term democracy at the start of this work, in that the decision to vote should be uncoerced and free.

  1. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    They saw a proletarian revolution to over throw the capitalism movement. They saw the masses of workers achieving class conscience and seeing the exploitation they were being put through, they would subsequently rise up in revolution. When first thought up revolutionary tactics were seen necessary for a number of reasons.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    Furthermore, the war exacerbated current problems whilst revealing the inadequacies of the existing regime and creating a host of new grievances. The war produced a large number of ex-soldiers who were ready recruits for new paramilitary organisations; in these circumstances, ideology was not requisite.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Rent of your lodging, conditions of lease, number of rooms, persons living in them, repair, insurance, buying and repairing furniture, heating, lighting, water, etc. (b) Food - bread, meat, vegetables, potatoes, etc, dairy produce, eggs, fish, butter, vegetable, oil, lard, sugar, salt, groceries, coffee, chicory, beer, wine, etc., tobacco. (c)

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Russian Federation (KPRF), the descendant of the old Communist Party, that approached the Agrarian Party (APR) about forming an alliance. Since the APR had also done well in the 1993 election (acquiring 48 to the KPRF's 64 seats), such an alliance had considerable potential.

  1. Critically Evaluate the Impact of Socialist Organisations and Ideas on the Early Labour Party.

    In 1868 the Trade Union Council was set up, and from this sprung the Parliamentary Committee in 1871, which worked towards some form of labour representation within Parliament. By 1886 there were nine working men in parliament, led by Henry Broadbent.

  2. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    Only a small number had joined trade unions, but the reason behind this was that they were illegal in a lot of places. For the Proletariat, any benefits the revolution may hold would have to wait in the future. Marx?s ideas would soon become a force in driving the striving

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work