• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society" Many Socialists have believed that Socialism could only be introduced by overthrowing the current political system. Blanqui proposed to do it through a small band of conspirators. Marx and Engels however, saw a proletarian revolution in which the masses of the working class would overthrow the bourgeoisie. This view arose from a growing dislike of Capitalism; industrialization having produced an injustice geared towards the working classes with widespread poverty and unemployment. Moreover, the proletariat did not have a political voice to represent them, as the majority of workers could not vote. These socialists saw that the state in an effort to act in the favour of capital and negated the needs of the Labour. Thus, people like Marx said that revolution was unavoidable to instate Socialism. The context of these theories was unsettled with many discontent in the lower classes during the 19th century. ...read more.

Middle

Bernstein was one writer on this concept and argued this case by suggesting that the Capitalist Bourgeoisie's new adherence to democracy would open the door to socialist influence. He noted the appearance of new factory legislation, the freeing of trade unions and co-operative trading as well as standard conditions for Labour in the work place. He saw these as characteristics of change that would lead to continued evolution. The biggest problem with the socialist link to democracy was quite broadly; should socialists participate in Bourgeoisie governments and in doing so is it not giving a form of approval. Revolutionists tend to answer that it would. Early on there was no question; the Bourgeoisie was the enemy, however now evolutionary socialists are more often considered as being pragmatic in pressing forward their ideas. Literally, what ever ever works approach as opposed to a steadfast revolutionary option. ...read more.

Conclusion

Now, although not all socialists would agree, a lot are happy to play the system especially as the majority of concepts have been recognized as good and incorporated into the modern systems. The Socialist fight today is less war and violent revolt for the majority of socialists but a fight against the exceptional advance of capitalism. In modern times, the global market has come together and multi-national super companies have emerged. Socialists who are into direct action might protest against figureheads of this new super capitalism like the world trade organization or huge companies. Others, who are willing to use the democratic systems, might try to reduce it through pressure groups, Microsoft is currently being challenged and is an example of governments not destroying the huge companies but keeping them in check. A socialist today will still have strong arguments for change but maybe the majority will agree that no earth shattering change through revolt is needed in any real of immediacy, especially concerning countries in the E.U. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    Firstly at its base capitalism is a system of exploitation and oppression, which saw many of the working class being in stricken poverty and mass fear of unemployment, this virtually put any of the working class on the brink of revolution against the land and factory owners.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    The third problem carries some irony for the field of organizational learning. It is that the evaluation of programs, the search for additional information, may become a way of delaying the adoption of a policy or stopping it in its tracks at the implementation stage (Henry 1990: 122-4).

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    to be in place to have a democratic system of government, one must look at what capitalism provides to make a working democracy possible. One of the things that capitalism provides to make democracy possible is the affluence necessary maximize free time, or more specifically, to allow people to concentrate

  2. Critically Evaluate the Impact of Socialist Organisations and Ideas on the Early Labour Party.

    would impel us to actions on behalf of a future of the race, such as no man could command in his ordinary moods."8 The SDF never gained a large membership; its revolutionary policies were always at odds with the British working class, and Hyndman's lead was too rigid in stance

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    What breaks are there during the working day? 33. Do you take meals at definite intervals, or irregularly? Do you eat in the workshop or outside? 34. Does work go on during meal times? 35. If steam is used, when is it started and when stopped?

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    was more truly built on coal and iron than on blood and iron". Therefore, one might argue that the key to German Unification was not the growth of nationalism in the country but the development of an integrated economy. Prussia achieved this in Germany through the introduction of the Zollverein in 1834.

  1. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    system would be replaced by a new ideal, of a government run by, and for the people. The oppressed would turn against the oppressors, private ownership would be abolished, industry and commerce would now not be in the business of profit-making, but more to do with producing what was needed to get by.

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    distributed control to regional political leaders who used a traditional approach that was somewhat oppressive towards the local communities. Decisions were made by the most authoritative two states of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais who alternated the presidency between them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work