• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Socialists no longer seek to fundamentally change society" Many Socialists have believed that Socialism could only be introduced by overthrowing the current political system. Blanqui proposed to do it through a small band of conspirators. Marx and Engels however, saw a proletarian revolution in which the masses of the working class would overthrow the bourgeoisie. This view arose from a growing dislike of Capitalism; industrialization having produced an injustice geared towards the working classes with widespread poverty and unemployment. Moreover, the proletariat did not have a political voice to represent them, as the majority of workers could not vote. These socialists saw that the state in an effort to act in the favour of capital and negated the needs of the Labour. Thus, people like Marx said that revolution was unavoidable to instate Socialism. The context of these theories was unsettled with many discontent in the lower classes during the 19th century. ...read more.

Middle

Bernstein was one writer on this concept and argued this case by suggesting that the Capitalist Bourgeoisie's new adherence to democracy would open the door to socialist influence. He noted the appearance of new factory legislation, the freeing of trade unions and co-operative trading as well as standard conditions for Labour in the work place. He saw these as characteristics of change that would lead to continued evolution. The biggest problem with the socialist link to democracy was quite broadly; should socialists participate in Bourgeoisie governments and in doing so is it not giving a form of approval. Revolutionists tend to answer that it would. Early on there was no question; the Bourgeoisie was the enemy, however now evolutionary socialists are more often considered as being pragmatic in pressing forward their ideas. Literally, what ever ever works approach as opposed to a steadfast revolutionary option. ...read more.

Conclusion

Now, although not all socialists would agree, a lot are happy to play the system especially as the majority of concepts have been recognized as good and incorporated into the modern systems. The Socialist fight today is less war and violent revolt for the majority of socialists but a fight against the exceptional advance of capitalism. In modern times, the global market has come together and multi-national super companies have emerged. Socialists who are into direct action might protest against figureheads of this new super capitalism like the world trade organization or huge companies. Others, who are willing to use the democratic systems, might try to reduce it through pressure groups, Microsoft is currently being challenged and is an example of governments not destroying the huge companies but keeping them in check. A socialist today will still have strong arguments for change but maybe the majority will agree that no earth shattering change through revolt is needed in any real of immediacy, especially concerning countries in the E.U. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    The mosaic that is almost always the public policy realm may well imply that those who administer given public policies may be unable to assess the tradeoffs that would be involved were either single-loop or double-loop learning to be applied (Wilson 1989: 349).

  2. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    Firstly at its base capitalism is a system of exploitation and oppression, which saw many of the working class being in stricken poverty and mass fear of unemployment, this virtually put any of the working class on the brink of revolution against the land and factory owners.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    To begin this examination into the relationship between capitalism and democracy, Friedman suggests that it is not possible to decouple the two because history indicates that capitalism is a necessary condition for freedom, but not a sufficient condition in itself7.

  2. Critically Evaluate the Impact of Socialist Organisations and Ideas on the Early Labour Party.

    The party's leadership included H. H. Champion, another 'gentlemen'; working men Tom Mann and John Burns; and Eleanor Marx (Marx's daughter), Belfort Bax and William Morris, all three who quickly split to form the Socialist League, because of differences with Hyndman. Champion too, later split from the party, over its commitment to violent revolution, determining instead

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    This permanent goal should always be our aspiration and be a fundamental aspect of our work. Another extremely important aim is the pursuit of a European dimension of labour. The work of comparison carried out through inquiries in different European settings should provide us, as well as our French and

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    (Lamounier, 1999, p 131 - 189) By the time the new constitution was in place Argentina had been developing a lucrative export economics strategy for twenty years, externally, the demand for Argentinean products to satisfy European 'industrialization and urbanisation' (Waisman, 1999, p77)

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    However, most of the new entrants were small parties and, as the results of the 1995 election showed, this proliferation mainly served to further fragment the political center. The results of the 1995 election belied any expectation that learning necessarily progresses from experience.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    This therefore stimulated Nationalistic feelings amongst many academics in both Germany and Italy, who realised the value that was attached to local institutions, native customs, traditional culture and national language, thus promoting the cause of unification. The growth of nationalism in Germany was fuelled by several situations e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work