• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more successful they are." a) How far do you agree? (25 marks) b) What does this tell us about pressure groups and democracy in Britain today

Extracts from this document...


The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more successful the pressure group will be. a) How far do you agree? (25 marks) b) What does this tell us about pressure groups and democracy in Britain today? To an extent, it is clear that the wealth of pressure group is a key factor in determining how successful they are likely to become. Ultimately, a pressure group consists of a group of people, who possess a common aim to influence government policy however; they do not seek to win power through elections. Pressure groups are often grouped into two categories, which are 'insider and 'outsider' groups. Insider groups are provided with regular and privileged access to government when policies are made, whereas outsider groups do not possess links to the government and their advice is not required in any shape. Wealth is generally associated with 'insider' groups, as they are often the groups who are able to financially enhance a political party, which is enough motivation for the government to maintain their support for the respective pressure group. The impact on democracy is often cause for debate. It appears that insider groups promote a sense of elitism, as the wealth of a pressure group often determines whether it is classified as 'insider' or 'outsider' pressure group. The implications of this on democracy is that it is suggested that the views of the poor are capped and power is held by a few ...read more.


Arguably, the UK's political system could be described as 'pluralist' which would dismiss the claim that wealth is vital for the success of a pressure group. Pluralism enables us to expect a wide range of groups, interests, beliefs and ideologies to be allowed to flourish. However, the belief that the wealth of pressure groups determines their success is not an attribute of pluralism and if this is the case, elitism appears more plausible than pluralism. An example, which strengthens this claim, is the banking lobby. Often producer groups represent their shareholders and management rather than their workers. It is clear, that when such elite members are insider groups, it can only be detrimental, as the likelihood of these insider groups forming a combination with the government is high. The implications for democracy in general are severe. The presence of pressure groups appears to simply empower the already powerful, rather than ordinary citizens. The result is an increase in political inequality, which appears to merely reward those possessing wealth, expertise and connections to those in government. To add, pressure groups impact on democracy in the UK appears to be extremely detrimental, as it is extremely evident that some groups possess more power than others. For example, the influence of Robert Murdoch's BskyB cannot be compared to a trade union or charity. The effect on democracy is that pressure groups fail to adequately equip the majority with a voice. ...read more.


The implication of wealth and pressure groups on democracy is that, whilst pressure groups claim to cater for all, they unfortunately appear to favour the wealthy. The elitist nature of this results in power becoming concentrated and dispersed amongst only a few. Ultimately, this sparks a sense of tyranny of the minority, as looking at the nation's economic state it is clear that those with wealth are in the minority. The problem with this is that, ordinary citizens appear to be ignored in favour of those with a considerable amount financial wealth. However, it is clear that without wealth it is possible to still influence the thinking of the current government the public sector's lack of wealth hasn't been detrimental to its success. This shows that wealth may be important but the cause is even more so. This does enhance democracy as often the poorer pressure groups require a considerable amount of public support. Therefore, often these pressure groups are well supported, which means the government are forced to listen to the view of the public. The nature of pressure groups appears to be becoming increasingly elitist, as it appears that wealth and power is becoming too valuable in the search to influence the government. For this reason, I would personally say that the movement of pressure groups is currently flawed, and they must become more accessible in order to be relevant to everyone, and not just those who can support the government financially or by other means. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why are some pressure groups more successful than others?

    4 star(s)

    the airport and protesting on top of one of the planes, this gained a lot of media coverage and attention from both the public and the government. The use of public demonstrations can also aid the success of a pressure group, which can be seen from the 2010 NUS (National Union of Students)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Do pressure groups enhance or threaten democracy?

    3 star(s)

    This refers mainly to outsider pressure groups as insider pressure groups are not allowed to behave in such a way, if they intend to stay an insider. They are seen to threaten democracy as they rarely elect their leadership, rarely vote on policy and in some cases arguably mislead their members ( e.g.

  1. Pressure groups revision - short questions and answers.

    CSA on hunting * Seek to influence by 1. Ministers and civil servants 2. Parliament 3. Political parties 4. Public opinion 5. Direct action How do pressure groups use political protests to exert influence? * Form of direct action - though it's not illegal * They aim to cause

  2. Revision notes on pressure groups

    already been moved out from the "corridors of power" and onto the street * Their demands and wishes have already been ignored/heard * Nowadays, many view political protests as a waste of time, pointless and a waste of tax payer's money in order to police them. * Civil disobedience, e.g.

  1. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    With the use of pressure groups seeking to promote their cause, the public are capable of becoming actively involved in politics on issues which require personal opinion. By joining these pressure groups, the public are supporting ideas that generally are not supported by those of a party, which are not likely to get voted in.

  2. Compare and Contrast Pluralist and Marxist Accounts of Power in the UK and US.

    Pluralism would tell us that while there is still a vibrant, diverse range of options for people when they are looking for a source of news, then local and national sources have power in watching and analysing the government's policy and conveying their opinions and facts to the public.

  1. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    They have a chance to protest, petition and lobby which is all part of a healthy democratic society. The term "pressure group" is a broad term; so political commentator Wyn Grant makes the distinction between insider and outsider groups. Although difficult, it is possible to distinguish one from the other, by looking at the strategies they employ.

  2. Pressure groups revison notes

    Ideological outsiders- Want to be impartial, do not want to become part of the system, their objectives require outsider status and with it full independence and freedom of action eg: Amnesty International, anti-globalisation groups , Occupy Movement- use direct action rather than lobbying Similarities- PGs and Political Parties 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work