• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is liberal about John Rawls Theory of Justice? How may it be criticised?

Extracts from this document...


What is liberal about John Rawl's Theory of Justice? How may it be criticised? John Rawl's Theory of Justice (published in 1970) argues for principled reconciliation of liberty and equality. The theory is neither altruistic (focused on helping others), nor is it egoistic (self-concerned), Rawls offers a model of a fair choice situation within which parties would hypothetically choose mutually acceptable parties of justice. But to what extent is this theory liberal? Firstly Rawls believes in the theory of a "social contract", similarly to Hobbes and Locke, which is a liberal idea. As Locke maintains, "where there is no law there is no freedom". Our individual liberty requires that others are restrained from encroaching upon our freedom and this protection can arguably only provided by a sovereign state. Liberals recognise that it would be in their interests to sacrifice a portion of their liberty in order to protect their liberties, as well as avoid the "state of nature", within which life would be "nasty, brutish and short". ...read more.


It is also liberal in its "reasoned" approach, for example where it may be necessary to trade freedoms off each other for the sake of obtaining the largest possible system of rights. The second principle of justice involves social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are of the greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society (as mentioned previously, liberal to the same extent of welfare liberalism) and that offices and positions must be open to everyone under conditions of fair equality of opportunity. This again seems to be more egalitarian and socialist rather than liberal. Liberals are committed to equality - but on the grounds that all individuals are of equal moral worth and are therefore entitled to equal rights and responsibilities, yet are born with very different talents and entitled to rewards accordingly. Rawls theory seems in some ways to be more similar to social equality or achieving equality of outcome. Rawls theory of justice demonstrates that he holds a social liberal position, which is that he values equality but also emphasises common freedoms. ...read more.


Therefore they should be more community based and a universal system of justice would simply not be compatible with this. Michael Sandel wrote "Liberalism and Limits of Justice" and within it criticises how Rawls asks us to think about justice whilst divorcing us from the very values and aspirations that define u as well as that the original position is abstract and implausible. He primarily seeks to use liberal moral ideals to build a new "public philosophy" in America. Walzer believes that Rawls's Theory of Justice fails to incorporate any morals or values, and instead focuses too much of the bargaining of goods. From the left wing, Robert Paul Wolff argues that Rawls theory constructs justice from existing practice and does not take into account that there may already be existing problems of injustice embedded into the ideas of capitalism, private property and the market economy. A final criticism is put forward by Susna Moller Okinb who maintained that Rawls theory could justify injustices and hierarchies embedded within the family network. She also criticises Rawls for not taking patriarchal social relations and gendered division of labour into account. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lucy Goodwin 13.3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    he would be taking away from others, an action that was punishable. This rule applies to determining the amount of property one can acquire. As the population increased and as property took on value, there was a need for boundaries between the private properties of different owners.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    Further, Mill claims that there is good reason to believe that it is beneficial to society for the government to have a strict policy of never passing laws which restrict actions which do not involve harm to others. Brief statement of the Harm Principle: Mill formulates what is called the

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Monocratic and unitary systems are able to act even when broad consensus may be wanting or impossible to bring about. Participation from the ground up, so to speak, is not so loose or permissive as to actually tie the hands of or paralyze those at the center.

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    His theory's foundation is based upon rules as well; however, he places the most emphasis on the idea of personal property.

  1. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    Liberal election victory in 1880 differ distinctly from those of 1868, and it is now necessary to consider these before continuing the overlying analysis. The Tory government had been in power in the preceding six years and had pursued forceful policies both domestically and abroad, that had caused the electorate concern.

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    the family was the sphere of the private and the state is that of public. As Sabine (1973:376) explains, sovereignty to Bodin was a different kind of ownership; the prince is in no sense the proprietor of the public domain and cannot isolate it.

  1. Politics A: Analysing Theories of the State and Individual - Hobbes and Locke

    It was also thought that those who did not possess land would have to sell their labour to those who had. This meant selling their right to the product of their own labour, which implied they had no property rights and were the tools of others hence losing their rights as citizens and say in government.

  2. Democracy and Capitalism in the Developing World: Compatible or Conflictive.

    These will invariably generate the type of security necessary to encourage citizens to work, save and invest (Claude 1976). This also acts to release and foster the energies necessary to initiate change, entrepreneurial ventures and economic development. However, one will also see that while liberal democracy may be compatible with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work