• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Would British Political Parties Benefit From A Different Electoral System?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Would British Political Parties Benefit From A Different Electoral System? In Britain, elections to the House of Commons are decided through a simple majority system, commonly referred to as 'first-past-the-post' or FPTP. The system has its benefits, as it usually produces quick and clear results and a strong majority government. Moreover, it provides constituents with a strong link to their MP, enabling them to bring forward and discuss the interests of their community. However, there are strong arguments against FPTP. Firstly, it frequently produces disproportionate results between actual support for the party and the seats they win in parliament. Secondly, the nature of the system makes it difficult for smaller parties with dispersed support to gain high levels of representation, rendering it virtually impossible for them to participate in government. These deficiencies have led to the question of how democratic the system really is, which has resulted in electoral reform becoming a debatable political issue. There are many different alternatives to FPTP, most of which are far more proportionally representative. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, tactical voting would no longer be needed and wasted votes would be reduced. As for the problem of extremist parties, CAER suggests that raising the percentage of the minimum votes required would manage to regulate the minorities. After the past eleven years in office it could be said that the Labour party has done well under FPTP. Before the 1997 election, however, possibly due to doubts over whether they would win under FPTP, Labour promised a referendum on electoral reform and established an independent body - the Jenkins Commission - to look for a PR based alternative (. The commission considered STV but later scrapped the idea, on the basis that constituencies would be excessively large, the electorate would have too wide a choice of candidates and that counting the results would be a complex and slow process. Instead, the commission suggested AV+, a combination of the Alternative Vote and a form of open Party List. AV+ would provide much greater proportionality without requiring major changes in the system. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, it would appear that none of the discussed systems can guarantee all of these elements; the choice of any given system is always less than perfect. For parties such as the Liberal Democrats, UKIP, the Greens and others smaller still, the main concern is to gain greater political representation. Some of the systems they advocate do provide some of these elements. For parties who do well under FPTP, such as Labour and the Conservatives, the issue is understandably of less immediate importance. Since 1997 there has been major electoral reform in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the European Parliament and the London Mayoral electoral systems. The introduction of alternative systems in these places has yielded positive, democratic results which have already modified the political landscape. In part thanks to these results and in part owing to pressure from the minor parties and various interest groups, perhaps electoral reform will be considered more seriously by the dominating parties in the near future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Electoral Systems Assignment

    I believe that this system works well in Wales and Scotland as each country has parties associated with their own cultures; Plaid Cymru and Scottish National Party for example. AMS ensures smaller parties are granted more seats due to the proportional representation where they would have lost seats under a majority system.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    won; with the candidate who won most votes for that party being elected first and so on. Many argue that this is as fairer system that empowers the elector and reduces the influence of the party leadership. Where its used This system is used for UK election to the European Parliament.

  1. Electoral Systems.

    * Extreme parties would be unlikely to gain support by AV and coalition governments would be no more likely to arise than they are under First-Past-The-Post. * All MPs would have the support of a majority of their constituents. * It prevents MPs being elected on a minority of the vote.

  2. There are two main types of electoral system in the UK:First Past the Post ...

    PR encourages coalition governments, where different parties can work together as part of the Executive. This encourages a less confrontational form of politics because of the need for coalition parties to co-operate. This also means that there are fewer dramatic changes in policies as the two parties tend to keep a balanced 'middle way'.

  1. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    Londonderry is a mainly Catholic town, but the large Catholic area is only one constituency, whereas the smaller Protestant area has been split into three constituencies to give the Protestants more seats in Parliament. In Scotland and Wales, they have an average of 14,000 less voters in their constituencies than

  2. To what extent have governments and political parties agreed on how best to raise ...

    Lib Dems however propose slimmer versions of national testing consequently reducing pressure for both pupils and staff. They too would scrap the 600 page national curriculum to about 20 pages. Alternatively, the Conservatives have announced to scrap key stage 2 SATS but introduce a reading test which children undertake 2 years after primary to ensure their reading is fluent.

  1. There is no such thing as a perfect electoral system Discuss.

    Due to these reasons, FPTP can be seen as an imperfect electoral system because it is not proportional and doesn?t offer a lot of voter choice, therefore it doesn?t meet the Jenkins criteria fully. However the fact that FPTP has caused a single-party government in every election from 1945-2010 meets

  2. Democracy and the British Voting System.

    One suggestion to improve democracy is lowering the voting age. There are lots of arguments in favour of this; such as 16 year olds are able to pay taxes, go to war, marry and have a child. For them to be able to fight and even die for our country,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work