• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the effect of minority and majority influence on juror decision making (15 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the effect of minority and majority influence on juror decision making (15 marks) According to a social psychologist Le Bon, people become irrational and primitive in large groups and irrationality spreads like contagion. Jenness (1931) backed up Le Bon's ideas when he asked participants to estimate the number of beans in a big jar and conformity was first introduced by showing some participants a fake estimate of previous estimates. People tend to shift their estimates closer to those in the list as participants couldn't easily tell how many beans were in the jar, so picking a number close to the other estimates seems a sensible strategy. Asch's study (1955) investigated the effects of conformity to a majority when the task is ambiguous. The task was to determine which out of A, B, C matches the line X. Asch arranged for na�ve participants to be asked a question to which several stooges had already given the wrong answer. ...read more.

Middle

Moscovici identified four main factors which is important to have an influence over a majority. These are behavioural style, style of thinking, flexibility and identification. In his experiment in (1969), he re-run the Asch's experiment but only this time in reversed. He got groups of 6 participants with four na�ve participants and two stooges. It was a colour perception test with three conditions; first with stooges declaring all slides green, second where two thirds of the slides where declared green and the third one with a completely inconsistent choices. He found that 32 percent conformed only in the first condition. Moscovici believes that it is the consistency of the minority is persuasive. Consistency creates an impression of certainty and confidence. Its uncompromising attitude induces everyone else to take it seriously. Moreover, Nemeth and Wachtler (1983) applied Moscovici's study in mock juries. She wanted to see the influence of perceived autonomy and consistency on minority. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, it's more realistic than Moscovici's study about the colour of spots. In a real jury rooms the jurors typically sit in a long table, her study raises the question whether this seating arrangement might give too much influence to one juror. I think that seating arrangement doesn't necessarily have direct influence on the jurors. It will have to depend on how big the numbers of jurors are, if it was a long table then the one seating in the head of table might not necessarily affect the jurors seating at the other end of the table. However, I agree that if the minority is consistent with their choices and decision it can impact on the other juror's decision. In conclusion, majority influence would have more effect on jurors decision making because there are a larger number of people who have the same opinion, therefore you'd more likely to internalise your views to their views. Minority influence works if the minority can provide information which backs up their opinion and if the other people defect to the minority opinion. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    a)How might the view of the majority influence a jury when reaching a verdict? ...

    5 star(s)

    Another influence on verdicts is perceived autonomy, studied be Nemeth & Watchler. These psychologists aimed to show how an autonomous character has greater influence over someone who is not perceived so. This study can be applied to courtroom behaviour because the jury sit at a table in the deliberating room to come to a verdict.

  2. Psychology First Impression

    the number of positive and negative ranting between the positive primacy group and the negative primacy group revealing that people evaluation of Bob's characteristics depended on the order in which they had received the information about Bob and this supports the previous research that first information people received have a

  1. Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and ...

    Ultimately, the group members' estimates converged towards a 'group estimate' regardless of what their original estimate was. Sherif found a fairly large degree of convergence among the judgments within the group. Thus, in the absence of any 'real' physical cues, group members used the judgment of others to modify their own judgments.

  2. Social influence, its concepts and ethics

    Now as an example they gave a small shock to the learner to show the teacher what to expect, after this the learner then advised that they had a mild heart condition. The 'subject' was then given the controls. The shock system itself was interesting, Milgram's developed an intimidating shock

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    Examples of the images of the 'disgusting' pictures used in the slide show can be seen in appendix A. An interactive whiteboard screen was also used so that the participants are able to get a view of the images being used.

  2. difference between majority and minority influence

    The results of the experiment seemed to back up his opinion. Research was also conducted on majority influence and this was done by Asch, who brought changes to the ways people believed and provided the foundation for further research. Asch produced a variety of studies, one of which concentrated on the estimation given by of a group of participants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work