• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss research into the nature of relationships in different cultures. (24 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Discuss research into the nature of relationships in different cultures. (24 marks) There are substantial differences in the nature of relationships across cultures. One of these differences is whether relationships are on a voluntary or non-voluntary basis. In Western societies people have a high degree of social and geographical mobility and thus, interact more with one another and so meet new people. As Individualists are more independent, relationships are more likely to be formed due to love and attraction. However, in Non-Western societies, people have fewer opportunities to meet new people and this is reflected in their relationships. In the West, there is the element of freedom of choice when it comes to forming a relationship and importance is placed on the individuals. In Non-Western societies people tend to be interdependent and relationships formed are often linked to family approval and economic resources. Looking at Collectivist cultures, in 1992, Umadevi et al. compared preferences for arranged marriages or love marriages in female Indian students from professional and non-professional backgrounds. They found that both types of women were happy with the idea of an arranged marriage as long as their parents supported their decision. ...read more.

Middle

This could affect the results because formation of relationships may have been different to how it was a few years back, for example internet dating in Collectivist cultures is becoming increasingly popular. Moving onto research in Individualist cultures, Zaidi and Shuraydi (200) investigated the attitudes towards arranged marriages in a group of second generation Pakistani, Muslin women who were brought up in Canada. 20 women, aged between 16-30 were interviewed. The results showed women preferred Westernised marriage practices, in which there was a greater amount of partner choice. However, there are some drawbacks as there is also an element of SDB in this study. As these women live in an Individualist culture they may feel they have to agree with the social norms of the country. Also it could also be prone to demand characteristics (DCs) as those who know a little about the nature of the research could potentially figure out the answers the researcher wants and will provide them with it. Moreover, the sample wasn?t representative as only 20 participants were used. Due to this the study lacks PV so the results may be unreliable and so can?t compare them with other studies. ...read more.

Conclusion

None of these psychologists belong to the area they have studied which increases the level of cultural bias in their findings. However, there is contradictory evidence to all these studies. The study carried out by Moore and Leung supports the evolutionary approach (EA) as there were little cultural differences in terms of people?s attitudes to love and romance. In conjunction with this study, Bartles and Zeki?s study also supports the EA. It provides evidence that our brains have evolved to make us feel love and romance. Additionally Janowiak and Fischer argued that love is still universal. They studied non Western tribal societies and found clear evidence of romantic love in 90% of the 166 cultures studies. This again supports the EA as despite of the fact that the reasons for marriage and exchanges within a relationship are different to those we find in Western culture, love is still present across all cultures. If the EA is correct, then one would expect the need for romantic love to be universal and not culturally driven. However there are more studies providing evidence for clear differences of romantic relationships across cultures. We have seen this in the variation of opinions of arranged marriages in Individualistic and Collectivist cultures. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Mate Selection and Preferences Across Decades

    While deciding on what target the participants would choose for a dating partner, both the men and women overwhelmingly chose the physically attractive target. Sprecher stated that the women participants, however, reported being more influenced by the male targets income potential (1989).

  2. Cultural variations in relationships. Research has shown that there are differences between western cultures ...

    dating agencies and through friends. Many non western cultures are changing by becoming less collectivist and more individualistic. E.g. the Israeli Kibbutz families have changes from their extended family set up to one couple, their children and possibly one parent. Research suggests that recently non western cultures are becoming more non permanent in their relationships.

  1. Focus Group Research gives the researcher access to tacit, uncodified and experiential knowledge in ...

    Anning (2001) goes onto suggest that this type of perception often remains unidentified as it is not 'codified and stored in publications, libraries, databases and so on, and given foundational status by incorporation into examinations and publications' (p.6). It is only in the more recent literature on learning and knowledge that the

  2. Discuss the extent to which relationships have been shown to differ in cultures (24 ...

    They compared female Indian students from professional and nonprofessional backgrounds. Both groups were happy with the idea of having an arranged marriage if they gave consent. Despite this, Myers found no differences in marital satisfaction between Indian arranged couple and US non-arranged.

  1. Discuss the research into breakdown of relationships (24 marks)

    Nevertheless, model is relatable for many couples. This is due to the depth of the stages and it can also be applied to non-romantic couples, strengthening the reliability and ecological validity of the model. Despite these advantages, Lee?s model lacks scientific rigour because it relies on memories of the individuals,

  2. Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships. (24 ...

    The RNS theory states it should be throughout the relationship. This is because you need to satisfy your partner?s needs in order to get your rewards, which in essence is what keeps the relationship going if there is a balance.

  1. Discuss research into the breakdown of romantic relationships (24 marks)

    Due to this, the theory could potentially generate new hypotheses and therefore expand the range of knowledge on this topic. Psychologists could begin to find out which costs or rewards are more involved in the maintenance of relationships. The SET is a humanistic theory as it has intuitive credibility as

  2. Outline and evaluate research into the nature of relationships in different cultures

    Because of this, arranged marriages are not as common as they used to be. This makes the theory quite an old-fashioned view of Non-Western culture. Therefore, the conclusions made by this theory won?t always be appropriate to generalise to a wider society as clearly not all relationships in Non-Western societies are involuntary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work