• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss research (theories and/orstudies) relating to the formation of relationships.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss research (theories and/or studies) relating to the formation of relationships. As many different studies have proved, physical attractiveness seems to be top of the list in the formation of relationships. This is supported by a study conducted by Brigham (1971), who found that physical attraction is generalised to other attractive characteristics such as being sociable, independent, exciting and sexually warm - this is known as the "halo effect". According to the "matching hypothesis" we are attracted to those who resemble our own physical attraction. Walster et al (1966) conducted a study using 376 male and 376 female volunteers. He advertised a "computer dance" for students during fresher's week at college. ...read more.


Further support for the matching hypothesis is evident from Murstein (1972) who suggested that there was a definite tendency for two people in a couple to be similar in terms of physical attractiveness when he studied the physical attractiveness of engaged couples and those going out together when judged from photographs. The second most important factor in the formation of relationships is proximity. Strong evidence for this was found by Festinger et al (1950). The proximity may be physical or psychological. Increased contact has been shown to increase the likelihood of friendships and romantic relationships. Another important factor is attitude similarity. Byrne (1968) found that attitude similarity had much more of an effect on interpersonal relationships when the attitudes were of importance to the individual. ...read more.


According to the reinforcement and need satisfaction theory, we are attracted to people who provide us with reward or reinforcement. This is similar to the equity theory which states that we expect there to be an association between equity and future quality of a relationship, this takes into account the other person's rewards and costs. Finally, the filter theory proposed by Kerckhoff & Davis (1962) suggests that different factors progressively filter out individuals as prospective partners or friends. The final filter which is emotional needs is the deciding factor. The filter theory emphasises that factors which are considered important in the early part of a relationship differ from those that are consider important later in the relationship. The main limitation of this theory is that it may only apply to romantic relationships. ?? ?? ?? ?? Zainab Rahman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The matching hypothesis

    - Have an equal number of male and female participants- To eliminate any gender bias as some male participants may find it hard to rate male attractiveness. - The overall shape of someone may have an effect on their attractiveness thus I will only use photos that show the upper

  2. Relationship formation

    When we are choosing a mate we are influenced by desirability and the probability of the person saying yes (realistic choice). Murstein (1972) supports the theory that physical attractiveness is the main factor when forming a relationship (the matching hypothesis).

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    possible to generalise the findings to a wider population other than the one studied. Further research into exactly the same field was carried out by Walster et al. (1969) 3 years later and another 'computer dance' study was conducted. The repeat study was different in that the participants this time

  2. Describe and evaluate research relating to the formation and/or maintenance of relationships

    Profits include companionship, being cared for and sex, and costs include effort, financial investment and missed opportunities. Thibaut & Kelly produced a four-stage model of long-term relationships. The first stage was sampling, where the couple explore the rewards and costs in a variety of relationships.

  1. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    It was found that partners received very similar ratings and these ratings were considerably more alike than the same ratings given to random couples, i.e. the control group consisting of people who were not really romantic partners. This study provides strong support for the Matching Hypothesis.

  2. Discuss research (theories and/orstudies) relating to the dissolution of relationships.

    To give an answer to this question, Duck (1992) suggested that risk factors may be the cause of the dissolution of relationships. He identified several factors which are classified as predisposing (internal factors such as the personalities of the two people) and precipitating (external factors such as job loss) factors.

  1. The formation of relationships.

    Duck points out, that you cannot obtain a comprehensive list of attitudes when you meet a person for the first time. The enjoyment of developing a friendship is based on both parties gradually revealing their true personality. Physical attractiveness - this is the single most important factor in who we are attracted to.

  2. Evaluate Theories of the Formation of Romantic Relationships

    greater extent when individuals were shown a photo of the person they were in love with in contrast of someone they just liked. This supports the claim that we form relationships with those people who provide us with rewards; in this case, being in love increases dopamine activity in the brain, which is rewarding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work