• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

eyewitness testimony

Extracts from this document...


A - Describe one laboratory study on eyewitness testimony Loftus and Palmer 1974 conducted one laboratory experiment. They aimed to investigate how information supplied after an event influences an individuals recall. The study did not just consist of one single laboratory experiment but was in fact two different groups of two different experiments. The study was an independent measures design with the dependent variable in the first experiment is the participant's speed estimate and the dependent variable in the second experiment is whether the participant believed they saw glass. In the first experiment the sample was 45 students of the University of Washington in America. They were shown seven short video clips (in a laboratory) of a traffic accident. After they has seen this they were then asked to write an account of what they had just seen and answer specific questions in the style of a questionnaire. ...read more.


Similarly to the first study the participants were asked to watch a short film clip of a car accident. Two of the conditions were asked about the speed of the cars once again using the verbs hit and smashed as before. The last group was not interrogated on the speeds of the cars. A week later participants returned and asked if they saw any broken glass when in fact there was no broken glass in the film. In the smashed condition participants saw significantly more broken glass than any other verb or change in wording. 34% saw broken glass compared to 14% who did not. This developed the claim that the wording of a question in court can indeed affect the cognition of an individual's recollection of events just by a simple change of wording. In court this can affect an eyewitnesses recall of an event and make it 100% wrong despite them being 100% confidant. ...read more.


With the laboratory experiment there is low ecological validity because it is set in conditions not true to real life. The participants in Loftus and Palmer were shown a video of a car crash, and we can presume that their answers would have been different if the car crash was real and staged. Naturally occurring experiments usually take part outside of the laboratory and therefore are quite high in ecological validity. One problem with quasi experiments is that they do tend to go against a lot of ethics e.g. observation often requires consent, which in many cases does not get asked in fear of the results being changed with the behaviour of the participants. With eye witness testimony it is very hard to make a experiment which is ecologically valid and ethical making the main type of study used for these, laboratory experiments. In the courtroom, experiments cannot be staged unless often in the laboratory and it is very hard to catch a crime in action and observe it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    or feature that is under consideration (Remember why this study was conducted in the first place) An ethical study. Children are minors so researchers have to be more careful about potential harm that can be done to children than adults.

  2. Effect of category and hierachy on recall

    doing one test with structured and categorised words and the other half the test with unstructured words. 3. Have the two different sets of words and blank paper set up ready on the tables on each side of the room and ensure all participants have a pen.

  1. "It is clear that eyewitness testimony is entirely unreliable". To what extent does psychology ...

    This was a laboratory experiment with five conditions. Participants were shown a video of a car accident involving a number of cars. They were then asked to describe what had happened as if they were eyewitnesses. The participants were asked a number of questions such as "About how fast were

  2. whether leading questions can affect a person's memory of a question and insert an ...

    have shown that participants shown a violent film recalled less of the 40 items of information. The control group on the other hand were shown a less violent film and were found to recall more information. However, witnessing a real crime is more stressful than in a laboratory situation, therefore

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work